MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(47 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{fa-archive|nominated=12:26, 31 October 2009 (EDT)|passed=17:23, 16 December 2009 (EST)}}
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=12:26, 31 October 2009 (EDT)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} This article it's much detailed,sections with high quality images,sidequests section complete,all the special movdes with a demostration,all the references are written and has much official artwork this must be a FA.
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} This article it's very detailed,sections with high quality images,sidequests section complete,all the special movdes with a demostration,all the references are written and has much official artwork this must be a FA.
#[[user:Super Luigi!]] i agree, because this is the first Mario & Luigi RPG game, and it it is a highly detailed article.
#[[user:Super Luigi!]] i agree, because this is the first Mario & Luigi RPG game, and it it is a highly detailed article.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Just enough images are in here now and everything is well written.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} Just enough images are in here now and everything is well written.
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} - There are more images (though a few more in the enemies/bosses section would kill you)!!! That was the only problem, so I think that I will support for a greatly typed article!!!
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} - There are more images (though a few more in the enemies/bosses section would kill you)!!! That was the only problem, so I think that I will support for a greatly typed article!!!
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} After waiting, I say, YEAH!! This is great now, with the added images
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} States important features of the gmae, has official artowrk, and states intro/ending. Though it may have few grammatical errors, those can easily be fixed.
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} States important features of the gmae, has official artowrk, and states intro/ending. Though it may have few grammatical errors, those can easily be fixed.
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - The article has many screenshots that are very fun to look at :P
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - The article has many screenshots that are very fun to look at :P
 
#{{user|Tucayo}} - Awesome article. The tables are great, good job Gamefreak!!
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} I can see the fruits of our great labor being featured. Great job for implementing the stats on the table! Without your help, this would not get featured!
#{{User|Redstar}} See what a little hard work can get us? Supported, finally.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The article looks great now, but there are a few things that bother me, such as quality of some sprites.
#{{User|Joanfran1202}} - An awesome game, it needs to be a featured article !!!!


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Super mario fan}} - The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game.
#{{User|Redstar}} - The article is horribly written with run-on sentences, bad grammar, typos, and other mistakes. It is also riddled with needless information, such as trivia (since been cleaned up) and other fluff.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I changed my mind. This article is POLLUTED with grammar errors (especially tense errors) and a lot of the sentences are bland. The sentences are written out horribly, just what Redstar said. Also, this article screams out for consistency when it comes to the list of enemies and their sprites. Keep this up and we might have a featured article with too much grammar errors and boring verbs. If you don't see any grammar errors, then check out the consistency of tenses for starters. 


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====
'''Super mario fan'''
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} What sections are untrue? I found every section to be right from the game.
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} Per Fawfulfury65,I see the same
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} Per all, this article is 100% true.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Line 166: Line 158:
Um... Redstar, I still have spied some mistakes. First of all, "afterwords" is spelled "afterw'''a'''rds" in the article, which is incorrect spelling. It should be spelled "afterw'''o'''rds" with an O. And just one other thing I saw, you wrote "BeanBean" with two capital Bs. The game spells it with only one capital B, Beanbean. That's all that I saw, but other than that, you did great fixing every thing in that long section! {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Um... Redstar, I still have spied some mistakes. First of all, "afterwords" is spelled "afterw'''a'''rds" in the article, which is incorrect spelling. It should be spelled "afterw'''o'''rds" with an O. And just one other thing I saw, you wrote "BeanBean" with two capital Bs. The game spells it with only one capital B, Beanbean. That's all that I saw, but other than that, you did great fixing every thing in that long section! {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Afterward is spelled with an a, not an o. And I didn't do those rewrites... I started to, but it was reverted and someone else started to do it. Whether it's better or not now I don't know. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 16:01, 1 December 2009 (EST)
Afterward is spelled with an a, not an o. And I didn't do those rewrites... I started to, but it was reverted and someone else started to do it. Whether it's better or not now I don't know. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 16:01, 1 December 2009 (EST)
Afterward is correct, but I mean afterwards is not a word. If you won't undo my work, I'll fix all the places where it says BeanBean instead of beanbean. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
:Well, I know that. I don't know why I'd undo your work. I tried re-working it myself, but someone else undid it before I was finished... I've decided to support the Featuring of this article, since I feel we've done enough work towards improving it. Some finishing touches can be done, but I'll change my vote if LeafyGreen does so. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 16:37, 1 December 2009 (EST)
Hmm. I still see grammar errors. I think every tense in this article should be past tense. Also, I see no change in the enemy chart. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
:But,there are much changes!, you must only see the differences with the history button and you'll see the added images and information, also the grammar errors are only very few and it can be changed anytime!, if you want edit them yourself!--{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} 15:50, 3 December 2009 (EST)
::I'm going to have to side with MATEO on this one. We've worked on this thing for over a week now, and I feel I've pushed it to a good place. I would re-write the Story section myself, but the last time I tried that I was reverted because someone else wanted to do it instead. If there's any issues, be bold! You can be the person to do the last bits of work to get this featured. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 16:03, 3 December 2009 (EST)
Ok, so right now, I'm going to abstain (changed my vote, once again) until the bestiary is complete. I already uploaded some images needed, so all we need know is the stats. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
So, does anyone here have the SSS guide with stats? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
I'm wondering. Shouldn't the bosses have stats like the enemies have for consistency? I also think the Koopalings should be separated. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}}
Yeah I was thinking of doing that. You can work on all that boss section stuff, and I can find an online guide for stats. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Ok I checked every walkthrough and not one of them had POW, DEF, or SPEED. But they do all have HP, EXP, and Coins. So, should we change the table to show HP, coins, and EXP instead of the other stats? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
:Well, if that's the only thing you can find, then sure. But some enemies have ATK stats implemented on them already. I'll take that with a grain of salt, though. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
::I fixed the table up now, but I need help putting in the stats. [http://faqs.neoseeker.com/Games/GBA/mario_and_luigi_i.txt | This dude's walkthrough] shows all the stats needed so people can check that and help. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Ok Ok, NOW! Its all over! I finished the sections, the tables, and I'm beat! Please tell me this is good now!!! {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
There's two votes plus an admin on all of the oppose vote removals so... we can delete them now, right? {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
:According to my past proposal - yes {{User|Marioguy1}}
...Finally!!! 7-0!!!!--{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} 17:47, 16 December 2009 (EST)
{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Hmm. The Popple sprite is low quality and why is Trunkle (whatever that thing is) is facing the wrong way? Some sprites need work.
But these are minor things Dx don't worry about them. {{User|MATEOELBACAN}}
:Flipped the Trunkle sprite, but can't do anything about the others of low-quality. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 20:44, 19 December 2009 (EST)
::I wouldn't consider the Popple sprite low quility. Its an in-game sprite and well, Superstar Saga doesn't have the best of graphics. But like MATEO said, its minor anyways. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}