MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Toad

Toad

Support

1. Randombob-omb4761 (talk) I don't see any problems with this article, it looks very long, it has no red links or improvment templates. I never saw this featured.
2. PiranhaPlantLover17 (talk)

Oppose

1. Time Turner (talk) This article is so packed full of flowery writing that we could write a book using it. Also, perhaps it's because I'm on mobile, but this article looks ridiculously padded. Like someone tried to make it bigger for the sole purpose of making it bigger. I don't know if there's any missing information, or if there are things that should be covered, but these two problems alone cannot be allowed for a featured article. One more thing: "I never saw this featured" is the absolute worst reason to feature something, and should not be used as a valid reason in any circumstance.
2. Ashley and Red (talk) Per TT. Also, it ill be good if anyone change some of the images.
3. Icemario (talk) Per TT, and that Relationship section has some speculation sprinkled through it and needs quite a bit of work done on it anyway, per this proposal.

Comments

@PirahnaPlantLover, featured articles are based much more on quality than they are on how many people like the character. Lord G. matters. 18:32, 20 March 2014 (EDT)