Talk:Cape Feather: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(forgot to sign) |
(→"Wing Feather": new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is the feather from Super Mario RPG on here? It doesn't provide a cape at all. Either it should be removed from the article or the whole article should be moved simply to "Feather". ~ [[User:Joshi|Joshi]] 04:40, 24 April 2009 (EDT) | Why is the feather from Super Mario RPG on here? It doesn't provide a cape at all. Either it should be removed from the article or the whole article should be moved simply to "Feather". ~ [[User:Joshi|Joshi]] 04:40, 24 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
== "Wing Feather" == | |||
{{talk}} | |||
Why is the Feather that turns Mario in [[Wing Mario]] in SM64DS merged to Cape Feather? I know they're both feathers, but they look different and turn Mario into something else. Although both Power-Ups (Cape Mario and Wing Mario) make Mario fly, they have different attributes (Cape Mario: The cape on Mario's neck, Wing Mario: the wings on his cap), and the method of flying is different as well (Cape Mario: First a Jump, then up & down simulative (if I'm correct), Wing Mario: Triple Jump, then steer (Up = Dive, Down = raise) (again, if I'm correct)). I don't think I'll start a proposal yet, but I think to do either these things with this "Wing Feather": | |||
*Split it from Cape Feather, and merge it to [[Wing Cap]] (as they got pretty much the same effect) | |||
*Split it from Cape Feather, and make a new article for it | |||
I'd choose the second option myself, but I think you all would choose the first option instead. But if we make a new article, there are two more options: | |||
*Call the new article "Feather (Super Mario 64 DS)" | |||
*Call it "Wing Feather" instead | |||
I would choose the second option (again), but I think that would be a conjectural name, so I think the first one's more official. But I might be wrong.<br/> | |||
Tell me what you think about it. {{User:Arend/Sig}} |