MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Koopa Paratroopa: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:


TimeQ: I fixed the statistics section. I won't vote to remove your oppose vote; but your oppose vote is invalid now. I'll give you time to change it. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
TimeQ: I fixed the statistics section. I won't vote to remove your oppose vote; but your oppose vote is invalid now. I'll give you time to change it. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
:I don't think it's fixed. I think the idea is to put the two right next to each other, so the page isn't so long. I didn't see it before, though, so I could be wrong. {{user|Bloc Partier}}

Revision as of 14:55, March 27, 2010

Koopa Paratroopa

Support

  1. KS3 (talk) A great article with a lot of pictures, minimal amount of errors, and everything needed for a great FA.

Oppose

  1. Reversinator (talk) Some of the sections are one-liners, and there are some grammatical errors as well.
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Why is there a messed-up looking Paper Mario statistics section? Some sections are very short and others can use a little more images.
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though I like Paratroopa, I don't think this should be featured. Some info is missing. One example is New Super Mario Bros. Wii (and some others, but I added some too).
  4. Time Q (talk): That Paper Mario statistics section needs to be fixed.
  5. Commander Code-8 (talk) How can you say it has lots of images?

Removal of Opposes

Comments

@Commander Code-8: Well, it actually does have a good amount of images. Bloc Partier (talk)

TimeQ: I fixed the statistics section. I won't vote to remove your oppose vote; but your oppose vote is invalid now. I'll give you time to change it. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

I don't think it's fixed. I think the idea is to put the two right next to each other, so the page isn't so long. I didn't see it before, though, so I could be wrong. Bloc Partier (talk)