MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Krunch: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Nominated this article's unfeature since time was coming up for it to be on the main page and looking back, I feel we overhyped this article. This is my first unfeature, so hopefully, I'm not doing anything wrong.) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|Wikiboy10}} The nomination of [[Krunch]]'s article happened on [[MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Krunch|August 30, 2020]], and passed without opposition. Looking back, though, I feel there is just one problem the article has: the length. One user ''does'' try to justify this, stating that it isn't about the size of the article, and I get that. It's by far the best-written essay I've seen for a somewhat forgotten character, and it's not favoritism either. I think any subject, whether it be a loved character, a hated character, or a character people forget about, has the potential to be featured. However, the featured article rules state that length is crucial. I'll quote this: '''"In this case, although these articles are complete and are written to the best of the editor's abilities, they are too short to be categorized among the best articles in MarioWiki and therefore, are not rich enough in content to be considered featured articles."''' While everything is well-written (though I think the section regarding ''DKCR'' is a [[Krunch#Diddy_Kong_Racing|bit flowery and overdrawn]]), the piece isn't "rich" enough to be remarkable. Therefore, I am nominating this article to be unfeatured. | #{{User|Wikiboy10}} The nomination of [[Krunch]]'s article happened on [[MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Krunch|August 30, 2020]], and passed without opposition. Looking back, though, I feel there is just one problem the article has: the length. One user ''does'' try to justify this, stating that it isn't about the size of the article, and I get that. It's by far the best-written essay I've seen for a somewhat forgotten character, and it's not favoritism either. I think any subject, whether it be a loved character, a hated character, or a character people forget about, has the potential to be featured. However, the featured article rules state that length is crucial. I'll quote this: '''"In this case, although these articles are complete and are written to the best of the editor's abilities, they are too short to be categorized among the best articles in MarioWiki and therefore, are not rich enough in content to be considered featured articles."''' While everything is well-written (though I think the section regarding ''DKCR'' is a [[Krunch#Diddy_Kong_Racing|bit flowery and overdrawn]]), the piece isn't "rich" enough to be remarkable. Therefore, I am nominating this article to be unfeatured. | ||
#{{User|Pulsebot}} Per Wikiboy10. This page, while being really good-written and formally perfect, is... just not too out-standing to be featured (compared to others like [[Vivian]], [[King Olly]] or [[Dixie Kong]] (for being fair)). Additionally, I'd like to mention the [[Kiddy Kong]] page that falls exactly under the category (better than average articles, but doesn't qualify to be '''featured'''). | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 07:55, October 3, 2022
Krunch
Remove featured article status
- Wikiboy10 (talk) The nomination of Krunch's article happened on August 30, 2020, and passed without opposition. Looking back, though, I feel there is just one problem the article has: the length. One user does try to justify this, stating that it isn't about the size of the article, and I get that. It's by far the best-written essay I've seen for a somewhat forgotten character, and it's not favoritism either. I think any subject, whether it be a loved character, a hated character, or a character people forget about, has the potential to be featured. However, the featured article rules state that length is crucial. I'll quote this: "In this case, although these articles are complete and are written to the best of the editor's abilities, they are too short to be categorized among the best articles in MarioWiki and therefore, are not rich enough in content to be considered featured articles." While everything is well-written (though I think the section regarding DKCR is a bit flowery and overdrawn), the piece isn't "rich" enough to be remarkable. Therefore, I am nominating this article to be unfeatured.
- Pulsebot (talk) Per Wikiboy10. This page, while being really good-written and formally perfect, is... just not too out-standing to be featured (compared to others like Vivian, King Olly or Dixie Kong (for being fair)). Additionally, I'd like to mention the Kiddy Kong page that falls exactly under the category (better than average articles, but doesn't qualify to be featured).
