Talk:Bramball: Difference between revisions

Undo revision 2906828 by Trig Jegman (talk) Still open, just no further responses yet. Also the header was deliberate.
m (→‎The Pokey little Bramball: removed talk since discussion has died)
(Undo revision 2906828 by Trig Jegman (talk) Still open, just no further responses yet. Also the header was deliberate.)
Tag: Undo
Line 1: Line 1:
==The Pokey Little Bramball==
==The Pokey little Bramball==
{{talk}}
For a time, this was listed as a Pokey derivative, but was later declassified due to lack of explicit proof.
For a time, this was listed as a Pokey derivative, but was later declassified due to lack of explicit proof.
{{multiframe|[[File:NSMBU Bramball Artwork.png|130x130px]] [[File:NSMBU Pokey Artwork.png|120x120px]]|align=center}}<br>
{{multiframe|[[File:NSMBU Bramball Artwork.png|130x130px]] [[File:PokeyNSMBU|120x120px]]|align=center}}<br>
Thing is, though, they appear to have the exact same position and design of the eyes, while the spheres are roughly the same size as well. While this alone is very tenuous to use as proof, NSMBU had Bramballs do the exact same "turn into fruit" thing that Pokey and no third type of enemy does, which changes a few things in regards to that, I'd say. Maybe it could be considered a related species? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 16:35, 13 April 2018 (EDT)
Thing is, though, they appear to have the exact same position and design of the eyes, while the spheres are roughly the same size as well. While this alone is very tenuous to use as proof, NSMBU had Bramballs do the exact same "turn into fruit" thing that Pokey and no third type of enemy does, which changes a few things in regards to that, I'd say. Maybe it could be considered a related species? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 16:35, 13 April 2018 (EDT)