39,611
edits
Template talk:Warning: Difference between revisions
→Why does it say this?
(→Proposal: Addressing the template's issues: formatting (also, asking us to delete the proposal, letting us make the uncontested coding changes and then re-listing it with properly defined voting options might avoid a complete stalemate)) |
|||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Proposal: Addressing the template's issues == | == Proposal: Addressing the template's issues == | ||
{{ | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ProposalOutcome|blue|cancelled by administrator}}<small>As requested by proposer.</small> | |||
This template has some issues, and the point of this proposal is to address them. | This template has some issues, and the point of this proposal is to address them. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|B.wilson}}<br> | '''Proposer''': {{User|B.wilson}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': <s>December 3, 2011, 23:59 GMT</s> '''Extended''': <s>December 10, 2011, 23:59 GMT</s>, December 17, 2011, 23:59 GMT | '''Deadline''': <s>December 3, 2011, 23:59 GMT</s> '''Extended''': <s>December 10, 2011, 23:59 GMT</s>, <s>December 17, 2011, 23:59 GMT</s>, December 24, 2011, 23:59 GMT | ||
====Change==== | ====Change==== | ||
<s>{{User|Marioguy1}} - I agree that there is no problem with the current template, but if it's going to come down to which of these two templates is better, I am going to have to say the new one. It is indeed more clear, as he said. I think that this whole thing is overrated, but if B.wilson went through the work of creating the new template, I think that it wouldn't be much of a stretch for someone to just copy/paste it over.</s> | <s>{{User|Marioguy1}} - I agree that there is no problem with the current template, but if it's going to come down to which of these two templates is better, I am going to have to say the new one. It is indeed more clear, as he said. I think that this whole thing is overrated, but if B.wilson went through the work of creating the new template, I think that it wouldn't be much of a stretch for someone to just copy/paste it over.</s> | ||
#{{User|Glowsquid}} - I'm not sure about linking to the blocking policy, but the other proposed changes make sense. | #{{User|Glowsquid}} - I'm not sure about linking to the blocking policy, but the other proposed changes make sense. | ||
#{{User|ThePremiumYoshi}} - Per Marioguy1. The new version of the template is more clear and the link to the Blocking Policy would lead the user to know what it is specifically. | #{{User|ThePremiumYoshi}} - Per Marioguy1. The new version of the template is more clear and the link to the Blocking Policy would lead the user to know what it is specifically. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
#{{User|New Super Yoshi}}I only agree with rule 4. | #{{User|New Super Yoshi}}I only agree with rule 4. | ||
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Per Knife | #{{User|Superfiremario}} Per Knife | ||
#{{User|Phoenix}} I'm gonna say yes to unlinking the image, no to changing "Inappropriate behavior" to "Disruptive behavior", no to changing "Will be blocked" to "May be blocked", and honestly I don't really care if the "blocked from editing" is bolded or if the "blocked" links to the [[MarioWiki:Blocking | #{{User|Phoenix}} I'm gonna say yes to unlinking the image, no to changing "Inappropriate behavior" to "Disruptive behavior", no to changing "Will be blocked" to "May be blocked", and honestly I don't really care if the "blocked from editing" is bolded or if the "blocked" links to the [[MarioWiki:Blocking policy|blocking policy]]. | ||
#{{User|Awesome12456}} per knife | #{{User|Awesome12456}} per knife | ||
#{{User|Luigirules9898}} all | #{{User|Luigirules9898}} all | ||
#{{User|Mr.C}} Per Knife. | |||
====Don't Change==== | ====Don't Change==== | ||
| Line 49: | Line 52: | ||
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - I still support making these changes over not making them, however Walkazo's comment about deleting this proposal and then starting over with a half-half scenario seems like the best idea of all to me. And since it appears there will be no canceling the proposal, it failing is the next best thing. | #{{User|Marioguy1}} - I still support making these changes over not making them, however Walkazo's comment about deleting this proposal and then starting over with a half-half scenario seems like the best idea of all to me. And since it appears there will be no canceling the proposal, it failing is the next best thing. | ||
#{{User|Bop1996}} Per Walkazo and Mario4Ever. | #{{User|Bop1996}} Per Walkazo and Mario4Ever. | ||
#{{User|Baby Mario Bloops}} There is no significent difference. They both clearly state what it is enforcing, and are both formatted correctly. There is nothing wrong with the current one. | |||
#{{User|B.wilson}} - To withdraw this proposal | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
| Line 61: | Line 66: | ||
::::::::Does the format at [[User:B.wilson/proform]] do a favor? Because there are four points to change, and there is a section for each one of them --{{User|B.wilson}} | ::::::::Does the format at [[User:B.wilson/proform]] do a favor? Because there are four points to change, and there is a section for each one of them --{{User|B.wilson}} | ||
:::::::::That's way too involved, especially considering that this is a pretty minor change. Just decide on one intermediate step. The image de-linking is a no-brainer technical fix and I doubt anyone would oppose that, so adding the Blocking Policy link (plus that) is the most logical intermediate step between changing nothing and changing content (i.e. working and emphasis via. boldface). Just don't change the proposal, because that runs afoul of Rule 12, and even just changing this technical aspect is pushing it... And now that someone's voted in the semi-option with their own set of supports and oppositions, it just makes things even messier. Actually, by this point it might be easier to just cancel and start again with fully outlined options. Or just cancel it and let us make the technical changes informally and ''then'' revisit the content issue by itself. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 09:37, 22 November 2011 (EST) | :::::::::That's way too involved, especially considering that this is a pretty minor change. Just decide on one intermediate step. The image de-linking is a no-brainer technical fix and I doubt anyone would oppose that, so adding the Blocking Policy link (plus that) is the most logical intermediate step between changing nothing and changing content (i.e. working and emphasis via. boldface). Just don't change the proposal, because that runs afoul of Rule 12, and even just changing this technical aspect is pushing it... And now that someone's voted in the semi-option with their own set of supports and oppositions, it just makes things even messier. Actually, by this point it might be easier to just cancel and start again with fully outlined options. Or just cancel it and let us make the technical changes informally and ''then'' revisit the content issue by itself. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 09:37, 22 November 2011 (EST) | ||
== Why does it say this? == | |||
[[User:Bowser201|Bowser]][[User talk:Bowser201|201]] It says "This is a warning to stop your inappropriate behavior on the Super Mario Wiki (reason)". Shouldn't it say, "This is a warning to stop (reason) on the Super Mario Wiki" instead? | |||
:It actually says "This is a warning to stop your inappropriate behavior (''reason'') on the Super Mario Wiki." So it already says what you are suggesting. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 11:36, March 18, 2019 (EDT) | |||