User talk:Time Turner: Difference between revisions

User talk:Time Turner (edit)

Revision as of 13:23, October 30, 2018

38 bytes added , 5 years ago

m

→‎Species

Doc von Schmeltwick

46,647

edits

Revision as of 13:23, October 30, 2018 (edit) Doc von Schmeltwick (talk \| contribs) (→‎Species) ← Older edit		Revision as of 13:23, October 30, 2018 (edit) (undo) Doc von Schmeltwick (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Species) Newer edit →
Line 128:		Line 128:

	I'm not arguing against the proposal at all. You, however, are blatantly acting outside the proposal's parameters. [[:Category:Species]] not being under the list of affected categories means, quite literally, that it is not affected by it, and therefore, ''should not be changed because of it''. By definition, grammar, and everything in between. It is ''not affected''. According to the proposal itself. By virtue of not being brought up. So you shouldn't change it. As that's just not part of the proposal. Quite literally. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick\|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick\|talk]]) 13:11, 30 October 2018 (EDT)		I'm not arguing against the proposal at all. You, however, are blatantly acting outside the proposal's parameters. [[:Category:Species]] not being under the list of affected categories means, quite literally, that it is not affected by it, and therefore, ''should not be changed because of it''. By definition, grammar, and everything in between. It is ''not affected''. According to the proposal itself. By virtue of not being brought up. So you shouldn't change it. As that's just not part of the proposal. Quite literally. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick\|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick\|talk]]) 13:11, 30 October 2018 (EDT)
	:Note that ''most'' of them were already under a subcategory, so no I wouldn't. You just zapped the outliers unwarranted. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick\|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick\|talk]]) 13:23, 30 October 2018 (EDT)		:Note that ''most'' of them were already under a subcategory, so no I wouldn't (Animate Objects takes a lot of them). You just zapped the outliers unwarranted. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick\|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick\|talk]]) 13:23, 30 October 2018 (EDT)