Talk:Mario Tennis (series): Difference between revisions

Line 12: Line 12:
#{{User|Stonehill}} I see where you're headed, but this is like saying that ''[[Golf]]'' and ''[[NES Open Tournament Golf]]'' isn't part of the [[Mario Golf (series)|''Mario Golf'' series]]. Per Koopakoolklub and Pwwnd123.
#{{User|Stonehill}} I see where you're headed, but this is like saying that ''[[Golf]]'' and ''[[NES Open Tournament Golf]]'' isn't part of the [[Mario Golf (series)|''Mario Golf'' series]]. Per Koopakoolklub and Pwwnd123.
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} Despite not actually being the "real" start to Mario Tennis games, the 64 was a sequel, as it was even going to be called "Mario's ''Dream'' Tennis''.
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} Despite not actually being the "real" start to Mario Tennis games, the 64 was a sequel, as it was even going to be called "Mario's ''Dream'' Tennis''.
#{{User|Mario}} Per Ninelevendo. Koopakoolklub does not bring up the best examples, however. The Mario Kart arcade games, first, aren't a standalone game like this one (Mario Tennis has spiritual successors, not the arcade games). The arcade has spawned its own set of sequels, and since the arcade games are so different from the Nintendo Mario Kart games, I think it would be practical for the arcade to have its own series page (Nintendo doesn't even seem to acknowledge that the arcade ones are part of their Mario Kart series). Anyway, that's another proposal, even if the first one failed. The Mario Party Arcade example is also another poor example since the arcade games are direct ports to the arcade, so they shouldn't get their own series.


====Mario's Tennis is not part of the Mario Tennis series====
====Mario's Tennis is not part of the Mario Tennis series====