Editing User talk:KingGeoshiKoopshi64
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 333: | Line 333: | ||
{{last warning}} | {{last warning}} | ||
What you have repeatedly attempted to add [[Special:Diff/2849833|here]] unfortunately can't stay, since those mentions have nothing to do with the form that the article's subject is about. The ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' info '''might''' be able to go into trivia, but the ''Mario Golf: World Tour'' info goes into the [[Ice Flower]] article instead, and the ''Mario Tennis Aces'' info doesn't need to be mentioned at all because of how "obvious" it is. Keep in mind that you've been warned about edit warring multiple times in the past, and so consider this your final warning; any more edit wars you participate in '''will''' result in a block. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:12, January 17, 2020 (EST) | What you have repeatedly attempted to add [[Special:Diff/2849833|here]] unfortunately can't stay, since those mentions have nothing to do with the form that the article's subject is about. The ''Super Mario Galaxy 2'' info '''might''' be able to go into trivia, but the ''Mario Golf: World Tour'' info goes into the [[Ice Flower]] article instead, and the ''Mario Tennis Aces'' info doesn't need to be mentioned at all because of how "obvious" it is. Keep in mind that you've been warned about edit warring multiple times in the past, and so consider this your final warning; any more edit wars you participate in '''will''' result in a block. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:12, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
:Hey, I was trying to do the best of what I can and many people kept disregarding me even if it fitted or not, all because of many debates with different agreement issues, why do I need to be the only one to warned for!? That's really unfair...Because | :Hey, I was trying to do the best of what I can and many people kept disregarding me even if it fitted or not, all because of many debates with different agreement issues, why do I need to be the only one to warned for!? That's really unfair...Because Doc von Schmeltwick was edit warring as well, even if you don't agree with it. You are basically over powering your admin status just to frame me out. I don't even care if you block me, even if you really hate what I'm saying here. Just do it if you are really wanting too. I'm doing the best I can and I realize I'm not perfect but I want to help but you know what, but I don't think I'm needed here after all since people want to conflict me so many times, even if no one cares. --[[User:Gamermakerguy|Gamermakerguy]] ([[User talk:Gamermakerguy|talk]]) 14:37, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
::I was not edit warring, I deliberately waited after your last revert to see if anyone else would instead. Also, TTA isn't an admin. ''Also'', the "woe is me" type of thing isn't going to get you anywhere. If you have a problem with the warning, appeal it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:41, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ::I was not edit warring, I deliberately waited after your last revert to see if anyone else would instead. Also, TTA isn't an admin. ''Also'', the "woe is me" type of thing isn't going to get you anywhere. If you have a problem with the warning, appeal it. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 14:41, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ||
::'''(edit conflict)''' No, that wasn't my intent. Even ''if'' Doc was also at fault for edit warring, at that point you should have instead left a message on [[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|her talk page]] clearly explaining why you felt that said information was needed in the first place; instead, you chose to simply revert back to your preferred version for the third time. Also, what does a status as an admin have to do with this? I'm clearly not an admin, nor am I deliberately trying to undermine their authority either, so I won't be the one to block you in the end even if I tried. I'm also not "hating" what you're saying, just that what you're saying is highly contentious and thus needed to be discussed before jumping to any conclusions. That's literally all I'm trying I'm say; everything else is irrelevant. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:48, January 17, 2020 (EST) | ::'''(edit conflict)''' No, that wasn't my intent. Even ''if'' Doc was also at fault for edit warring, at that point you should have instead left a message on [[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|her talk page]] clearly explaining why you felt that said information was needed in the first place; instead, you chose to simply revert back to your preferred version for the third time. Also, what does a status as an admin have to do with this? I'm clearly not an admin, nor am I deliberately trying to undermine their authority either, so I won't be the one to block you in the end even if I tried. I'm also not "hating" what you're saying, just that what you're saying is highly contentious and thus needed to be discussed before jumping to any conclusions. That's literally all I'm trying I'm say; everything else is irrelevant. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 14:48, January 17, 2020 (EST) |