Editing Talk:Peach Blossom

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 77: Line 77:
#{{User|Lord Grammaticus}} - Same "broad strokes" argument made, same counterargument given: Though not ''all'' of the Mario Kart tires affect kart stats, enough of them do so that it makes no sense to merge them ''solely'' based on stats anyway. Different types of subjects receive different coverage, and that standard is completely different from our coverage of Final Smashes. And based on how the Smash Bros. moves we ''do'' cover are handle, there is a lack of grounds for a split; if Daisy's is the only case on the Wiki, that's because it is currently the ''only'' one within our current scope. Other Echo Fighters/Final Smashes would receive the same treatment were they to fall within that scope; besides that, we have [[Doctor Finale]] as an example of a Final Smash that warrants a split, as it has actual functional differences that cannot be neatly summarized with the term "reskin". You have yet to provide evidence that there are any substantial differences ''not based in the visuals'' between Peach Blossom and Daisy Blossom, and thus your argument for splitting them is overall weak. Your claim of "end user friendliness" also remains similarly unfounded: the in-wiki search tool already leads "Daisy Blossom" to this page, and there's SmashWiki if a user wants a highly-detailed article on Final Smashes and other moves anyway. Not only does this read like a basic misunderstanding of how search engines work, there is no evidence presented, statistical or otherwise, that suggests this claim has any substance, much less any real benefit beyond the personal convenience of a select few - and as such it seems entirely subjective in nature and lacking in merit. And even with any evidence, we are in no way obligated to act ''solely'' in the interest of search result rankings, which seems to be the only real motivation behind this proposal, in any manner. '''EDIT:''' No, I do not support the merging of the other listed articles on this basis, nor do I oppose them - those are separate arguments to be made on the appropriate talk pages for those articles, and [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Peach_Blossom&curid=39445&diff=0&oldid=2786115 your obvious attempt to alter the conditions of this proposal to try and end around changes to affect unrelated pages], especially without altering the allotted options, is highly disingenuous to say the least.   
#{{User|Lord Grammaticus}} - Same "broad strokes" argument made, same counterargument given: Though not ''all'' of the Mario Kart tires affect kart stats, enough of them do so that it makes no sense to merge them ''solely'' based on stats anyway. Different types of subjects receive different coverage, and that standard is completely different from our coverage of Final Smashes. And based on how the Smash Bros. moves we ''do'' cover are handle, there is a lack of grounds for a split; if Daisy's is the only case on the Wiki, that's because it is currently the ''only'' one within our current scope. Other Echo Fighters/Final Smashes would receive the same treatment were they to fall within that scope; besides that, we have [[Doctor Finale]] as an example of a Final Smash that warrants a split, as it has actual functional differences that cannot be neatly summarized with the term "reskin". You have yet to provide evidence that there are any substantial differences ''not based in the visuals'' between Peach Blossom and Daisy Blossom, and thus your argument for splitting them is overall weak. Your claim of "end user friendliness" also remains similarly unfounded: the in-wiki search tool already leads "Daisy Blossom" to this page, and there's SmashWiki if a user wants a highly-detailed article on Final Smashes and other moves anyway. Not only does this read like a basic misunderstanding of how search engines work, there is no evidence presented, statistical or otherwise, that suggests this claim has any substance, much less any real benefit beyond the personal convenience of a select few - and as such it seems entirely subjective in nature and lacking in merit. And even with any evidence, we are in no way obligated to act ''solely'' in the interest of search result rankings, which seems to be the only real motivation behind this proposal, in any manner. '''EDIT:''' No, I do not support the merging of the other listed articles on this basis, nor do I oppose them - those are separate arguments to be made on the appropriate talk pages for those articles, and [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Peach_Blossom&curid=39445&diff=0&oldid=2786115 your obvious attempt to alter the conditions of this proposal to try and end around changes to affect unrelated pages], especially without altering the allotted options, is highly disingenuous to say the least.   
#{{User|CastleResearch}} - It's already properly covered in another wiki, no need to cover it here since the differences are only visual like other users have stated. This is not SmashWiki.
#{{User|CastleResearch}} - It's already properly covered in another wiki, no need to cover it here since the differences are only visual like other users have stated. This is not SmashWiki.
#{{User|Doomhiker}} Per all.


====Comments====
====Comments====

Please note that all contributions to the Super Mario Wiki are considered to be released under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license (see MarioWiki:Copyrights for details). If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here. You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)