Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Neo Bowser City
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=15:05, 2 September 2015 | |nominated=15:05, 2 September 2015 | ||
| | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|ZonkMario64}} Yes, I tried a year ago, but it only failed because it was too short. It is longer now, therefore I think it should be featured. | ||
#{{User|PowerKamek}} | #{{User|PowerKamek}} | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} | #{{User|Tails777}} | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Time Turner}} I think it's important to recognize that featured articles aren't just ticking boxes off of a checklist, they're standing on their own | #{{User|Time Turner}} I think it's important to recognize that featured articles aren't just ticking boxes off of a checklist, they're standing on their own to feet in order to serve as a prime example to users in order to demonstrate what one of the wiki's best articles should look like. With that said, the article's very... eh. The intro proper is only two lines (and it doesn't even mention Mario Kart 8), with the rest of it being trivia points cobbled from the section, so that's already an immediate strike against it for me. The course layout also seems rather short, especially when there are other articles, like [[Koopa Cape]], [[Wuhu Loop]], and [[Shy Guy Bazaar]] with much more detail in the same section. Besides that, the grammar and spelling are fine, but it doesn't really inspire the "best of the best" qualities that I was talking about. | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
| Line 23: | Line 19: | ||
:While it's a bit longer than before, I think the real question is does the quality of the article qualify for being featured? I mean outstanding or not, if an article has good quality and length, Mario Kart tracks can still be featured. Correct me if I'm wrong. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | :While it's a bit longer than before, I think the real question is does the quality of the article qualify for being featured? I mean outstanding or not, if an article has good quality and length, Mario Kart tracks can still be featured. Correct me if I'm wrong. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | ||
::It's hard for me to determine since Neo Bowser City is pretty run-of-the-mill track article IMO and that there hasn't been a track featured yet, if I'm corrected or not. The quality seems "okay" ish since it did have some grammar issues I just corrected. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:42, 2 September 2015 (EDT) | ::It's hard for me to determine since Neo Bowser City is pretty run-of-the-mill track article IMO and that there hasn't been a track featured yet, if I'm corrected or not. The quality seems "okay" ish since it did have some grammar issues I just corrected. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 21:42, 2 September 2015 (EDT) | ||
