Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Chuck Quizmo

__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=5:10, 16 June 2011 (GMT).
|lastedit=00:35, 4 August 2011 (GMT)
|nosupport=true
}}
==== Support ====

==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} this article is to short to be featured according to this proposal [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_9#The_Notability_Standard] a featured article must have a minimum of 4000 characters of pure text and according to Mario4Ever this article only has 2,818 characters (including spaces)
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} Unless Microsoft Word is inaccurate, this article is not long enough to be featured.
#{{User|Superfiremario}} Per Goomba.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} The trivia section is as long as the article. Not all articles can be featured, even if all met their requirements other than length. No offense, but I hope this isn't a joke nomination.
#{{User|DKPetey99}} Just because there is no templates, does not mean it meets featured article requirements. By that logic, [[Cannonballer]] deserves to be featured. This article is not the best the wiki has to offer, which is a requirement FA's must meet.
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} Per Goomba's Shoe, Mario4Ever, LGM, and DKPetey.
#{{User|Nicke8}} Not even if there was a list of the questions he asked. *idea* Per all.
#{{User|Mario Bros.!}} Construction
#{{User|New Super Mario}} Per UltraMario
#{{User|Mastablasta}} The question list isn't even close to complete, and it ''does'' have a template.

==== Removal of Opposes ====

==== Comments ====
I don't think it's long enough i'm pretty sure it has to be at least 4000 characters of pure informational text {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}}
:All the Featured Article standards say is that it must be of reasonable length, but I don't know if that's a specific amount or just not a stub. {{User|Mario4Ever}}
::I think the general rule is 4000 characters at least thats what ive heard from the featured article talk page although i'm not sure if thats an official rule or not. {{User|Goomba's Shoe15}}
:::That USED to be the general rule, but now, the rule is that the article must have reasonable length. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}}
::::Yeah, but what defines "reasonable length"? I think the process would be easier if there was a specific requirement that had to be met length-wise rather than relying upon a subjective interpretation of "reasonable length." {{User|Mario4Ever}}