Template talk:Dice: Difference between revisions

Line 13: Line 13:
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all.
#{{User|Niiue}} Per all.
#{{User|Niiue}} Per all.
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Changed mind per [[MarioWiki:Navigation templates]].
<s>#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} Changed mind per [[MarioWiki:Navigation templates]].</s>
===Use a "Get Out of Jail Free" card instead===
===Use a "Get Out of Jail Free" card instead===
<s>#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} This doesn't sit well with me. Why not instead put the category on the template? I roll the dice again...</s>
#{{User|Bazooka Mario}} The reason we deleted the doors and cards templates was that the elements in question had barely any relation to each other aside from tying tons of generic or random (as with the flower nav template) subjects together. Dice Blocks are not generic items unlike doors and cards, and they all appear as significant elements within Mario Party (unlike doors which aren't significant, not as dice blocks) and I feel they share characteristics the similar way Blocks and Pipes and Mushrooms all share appearances and characteristics. If we're going to use "but X category exists" as a justification for this, why even have navigation templates? The proposal doesn't even explain why we don't need this one besides making flawed comparisons to previous proposals and just operating on circular reason fallacy, being that we assume this is useless and we therefore conclude it's useless. If we going to remove this template, ''at least'' merge this to {{tem|Blocks}} and create a new subsection that deals with Dice Blocks.
#{{User|Bazooka Mario}} The reason we deleted the doors and cards templates was that the elements in question had barely any relation to each other aside from tying tons of generic or random (as with the flower nav template) subjects together. Dice Blocks are not generic items unlike doors and cards, and they all appear as significant elements within Mario Party (unlike doors which aren't significant, not as dice blocks) and I feel they share characteristics the similar way Blocks and Pipes and Mushrooms all share appearances and characteristics. If we're going to use "but X category exists" as a justification for this, why even have navigation templates? The proposal doesn't even explain why we don't need this one besides making flawed comparisons to previous proposals and just operating on circular reason fallacy, being that we assume this is useless and we therefore conclude it's useless. If we going to remove this template, ''at least'' merge this to {{tem|Blocks}} and create a new subsection that deals with Dice Blocks.
 
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} This doesn't sit well with me. Why not instead put the category on the template? I roll the dice again... Per Bazooka Mario.
===Comments===
===Comments===
@FanOfYoshi: Putting a link to the category on this template would just take you to another list with the same contents and doesn't solve the issue of redundancy. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 16:48, 31 January 2019 (EST)
@FanOfYoshi: Putting a link to the category on this template would just take you to another list with the same contents and doesn't solve the issue of redundancy. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 16:48, 31 January 2019 (EST)
8,569

edits