48,332
edits
Talk:Wii: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Marcelagus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FATALK}} | {{FATALK}} | ||
{{PAIRreview | |||
|A-rating=4.0 | |||
|A-comment=Well, I don't have much to work with, but I'll give it a try. I only saw one accuracy fail, and that is when it states that both Super Paper Mario and Mario Strikers Charged Footbal were each the first traditional Mario game. Make up your mind people. Other than that, it's all accurate. | |||
|D-rating=3.0 | |||
|D-comment=I really don't see how come each of the Mario games don't have a short explination of its games, like... Alright, none of the console articles explain their games, but still, it should be done. The same goes for the Virtual Console. You explained WiiWare, so why not Virtual Console? | |||
|G-rating=3.5 | |||
|G-comment=Grammatical errors are few, yet they do make an appearance every now and then. | |||
|I-rating=4.0 | |||
|I-comment=Hooray! This article totally doesn't need more images! | |||
|F-rating=3.5 | |||
|F-comment=Sticking with my previous idea, the games should be placed in a table. It would have the short explination, an image, the date of release, and a rating. The same should be done with the channels. But looking at what's actually in the article, it's ok. | |||
|FR-comment=While it's certainly better than many articles I've seen, it still needs a few more tweaks. | |||
|signature={{User:Reversinator/sig}}}} | |||
==Wii update== | ==Wii update== | ||
Someone needs to add the new channle(s) Wiiware(if Wiiware is considered a channle) and The Nintendo Channle, if no one responds ill get on this in a little bit.<br>{{user: theused/sig}}-- 21:45, 12 May 2008 (EDT) | Someone needs to add the new channle(s) Wiiware(if Wiiware is considered a channle) and The Nintendo Channle, if no one responds ill get on this in a little bit.<br>{{user: theused/sig}}-- 21:45, 12 May 2008 (EDT) | ||