8,169
edits
Talk:Game & Watch Collection: Difference between revisions
Passed
(→Collection 1/Collection 2: Commenting.) |
(Passed) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Collection 1/Collection 2 == | == Collection 1/Collection 2 == | ||
I think we should transform this article into a series article. Currently, it looks like it is Game & Watch Collection 1 article, with Game & Watch Collection 2 informations added, but it would be better if it was something like this : | I think we should transform this article into a series article. Currently, it looks like it is Game & Watch Collection 1 article, with Game & Watch Collection 2 informations added, but it would be better if it was something like this : | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 24: | ||
I hope you see what I mean. {{User:Banon/sig}} 17:43, 10 November 2012 (EST) | I hope you see what I mean. {{User:Banon/sig}} 17:43, 10 November 2012 (EST) | ||
:Hmm, you have a point. That would probably be the best way to organize the article.--[[File: | :Hmm, you have a point. That would probably be the best way to organize the article.--[[File:MKT Icon BowserJr.png|35px|link=Bowser Junior]] [[User:BowserJunior|Bowser]][[User Talk:BowserJunior|Junior]] [http://youtube.com/watch?v=smfAA6NN5Cs RULES!] 23:39, 9 January 2013 (EST) | ||
Remember that we aren't giving the sequel full coverage, as it is not directly related to the ''Mario'' series. Organizing it through a series format will make it appear that we are ''actually'' giving it full coverage, which is something we don't want to do. I think it's fine as it is now. It is more focused on the first installment, as it should be. | Remember that we aren't giving the sequel full coverage, as it is not directly related to the ''Mario'' series. Organizing it through a series format will make it appear that we are ''actually'' giving it full coverage, which is something we don't want to do. I think it's fine as it is now. It is more focused on the first installment, as it should be. | ||
{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 03:43, 10 January 2013 (EST) | {{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 03:43, 10 January 2013 (EST) | ||
:Ok, I got it. {{User:Banon/sig}} 14:33, 5 February 2013 (EST) | |||
== ??? == | |||
I remember that once I used an Action Replay and the console readed it as this game. I quit because scaried, but I could be able to play it fully. {{User:Tsunami/sig}} | |||
== Remove info on ''Game & Watch Collection 2'' == | |||
Should we remove information on ''Game & Watch Collection 2''? It is not ''Mario''-related. {{User:Wynn Liaw/sig}} 06:31, December 29, 2020 (EST) | |||
== Remove information on ''Game & Watch Collection 2'' == | |||
{{SettledTPP}} | |||
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|5-0|remove}} | |||
''Game & Watch Collection 2'' have nothing to do with ''Mario''. ''Game & Watch Collection'' deserves a page on this wiki as it has ''Donkey Kong'', but ''Game & Watch Collection 2'' only has ''Parachute'', ''Octopus'', and a combination of both. Both games do not feature ''Mario'' characters. So, it is not ''Mario''-related and we should not cover it on the wiki. However, we can mention that ''Game & Watch Collection 2'' is the sequel to ''Game & Watch Collection''. | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Wynn Liaw}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': April 23, 2021, 23:59 GMT | |||
====Support==== | |||
#{{User|Wynn Liaw}} Per my proposal. | |||
#{{User|Waluigi Time}} Per proposal. It's pretty telling that the sequel never even got its own page and was just tacked on here. | |||
#{{User|The Mansion}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Archivist Toadette}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|RHG1951}} Per all. | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
====Comments==== | |||