Talk:Dark Koopatrol (Super Paper Mario): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
:Actually, the stub template was removed from the article you mentioned before you posted this comment. [[User:Lord Grammaticus|Lord Grammaticus]] 21:33, 18 January 2012 (EST)
:Actually, the stub template was removed from the article you mentioned before you posted this comment. [[User:Lord Grammaticus|Lord Grammaticus]] 21:33, 18 January 2012 (EST)
:It was? GREAT! I was hoping someone would remove it, because I requested it to be deleted on the talk page. Never mind considering this article a stub.[[User:M&L|M&L  Beware my fury!]] 21:36, 18 January 2012 (EST)
:It was? GREAT! I was hoping someone would remove it, because I requested it to be deleted on the talk page. Never mind considering this article a stub.[[User:M&L|M&L  Beware my fury!]] 21:36, 18 January 2012 (EST)
::You don't have to announce it. If you feel like it's not a stub, simply remove the template ;) {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}}
:How?[[User:M&L|M&L  Beware my fury!]] 21:42, 18 January 2012 (EST)
::Click edit and remove the stub template {{User|Raven Effect}}
It's ''that'' easy? How come stubs even exist if you could easily change it?[[User:M&L|M&L  Beware my fury!]] 21:48, 18 January 2012 (EST)
:Because some articles do qualify for stubs, still. {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}}
:Do you have to announce if you make an article a stub?[[User:M&L|M&L  Beware my fury!]] 21:55, 18 January 2012 (EST)
::No you don't, but it's wise to put it in the edit summary and your reasons {{User:BabyLuigiOnFire/sig}}
:Okay.[[User:M&L|M&L  Beware my fury!]] 21:57, 18 January 2012 (EST)

Latest revision as of 22:57, January 18, 2012

This article should be considered a stub, the Dark Koopa one has the same amount of information and every bit of information like this one, but it's considered a stub, so this one should be too!M&L Beware my fury! 21:31, 18 January 2012 (EST)
Actually, the stub template was removed from the article you mentioned before you posted this comment. Lord Grammaticus 21:33, 18 January 2012 (EST)
It was? GREAT! I was hoping someone would remove it, because I requested it to be deleted on the talk page. Never mind considering this article a stub.M&L Beware my fury! 21:36, 18 January 2012 (EST)
You don't have to announce it. If you feel like it's not a stub, simply remove the template ;) BabyLuigiFire.png Ray Trace(T|C)
How?M&L Beware my fury! 21:42, 18 January 2012 (EST)
Click edit and remove the stub template Raven Effect (talk)

It's that easy? How come stubs even exist if you could easily change it?M&L Beware my fury! 21:48, 18 January 2012 (EST)

Because some articles do qualify for stubs, still. BabyLuigiFire.png Ray Trace(T|C)
Do you have to announce if you make an article a stub?M&L Beware my fury! 21:55, 18 January 2012 (EST)
No you don't, but it's wise to put it in the edit summary and your reasons BabyLuigiFire.png Ray Trace(T|C)
Okay.M&L Beware my fury! 21:57, 18 January 2012 (EST)