58,762
edits
MarioWiki talk:BJAODN: Difference between revisions
→The user comments kinda suck
YoshiToad04 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (158 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown) | |||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
==Baby on Wii== | ==Baby on Wii== | ||
Credit goes to me for finding it, Blitzwing for nominating it as BJAODN worthy, and Plumber for adding it. {{User: Master Lucario/sig}} | Credit goes to me for finding it, Blitzwing for nominating it as BJAODN worthy, and Plumber for adding it. {{User: Master Lucario/sig}} | ||
Wait, where can I find this? [[User:SomeRandomNintendoFan|SomeRandomNintendoFan]] ([[User talk:SomeRandomNintendoFan|talk]]) 19:43, December 30, 2021 (EST) | |||
==The archive is open for anyone to edit, as long as the added content answers one golden criteria: It must be funny.== | ==The archive is open for anyone to edit, as long as the added content answers one golden criteria: It must be funny.== | ||
| Line 184: | Line 186: | ||
:Uhm, I think that's just a pun: it's an amusement park ("'''A'''-musement"), but it's B-class, so you could also call it "'''B'''-musement" (= bemusement) park. Don't know what S-Y and PGB mean by "ugly" and "sicko" though. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:14, 31 December 2008 (EST) | :Uhm, I think that's just a pun: it's an amusement park ("'''A'''-musement"), but it's B-class, so you could also call it "'''B'''-musement" (= bemusement) park. Don't know what S-Y and PGB mean by "ugly" and "sicko" though. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:14, 31 December 2008 (EST) | ||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
I think we should do something about the flood of comments on this page. Most of them are totally unfunny and just make the page ridiculously long. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:19, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | I think we should do something about the flood of comments on this page. Most of them are totally unfunny and just make the page ridiculously long. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:19, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:I agree. Originally the idea was to only have comments that were directly associated with the article, like the text entered in the deletion log by a Sysop or in the original edit summary. It never was intended as a place for everybody to drop their own comments afterwards. I think we should get rid of at least some comments, if not all of them. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 08:10, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | :I agree. Originally the idea was to only have comments that were directly associated with the article, like the text entered in the deletion log by a Sysop or in the original edit summary. It never was intended as a place for everybody to drop their own comments afterwards. I think we should get rid of at least some comments, if not all of them. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 08:10, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::I agree, we should delete all useless comments NOW --[http://www.mariowiki.com/User:Tucayo | ::I agree, we should delete all useless comments NOW --[http://www.mariowiki.com/User:Tucayo Tucayo]([[User talk:Tucayo|talk]]) [[MarioWiki:The_'Shroom|<span style="font-family:font; color:Green; cursor:crosshair"><font>The 'Shroom</font></span> ]] 12:48, 10 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::As the old version of the rules said, comments that are nothing than "WTF is DIZ", "WOW THIS SUCKS" and "YOU GOT TO BE KIDDING ME" should be deleted, everything else, if it's funny or informative, should stay. But I guess it's too late to voice my views. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] 18:12, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | :::As the old version of the rules said, comments that are nothing than "WTF is DIZ", "WOW THIS SUCKS" and "YOU GOT TO BE KIDDING ME" should be deleted, everything else, if it's funny or informative, should stay. But I guess it's too late to voice my views. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] 18:12, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::It was too full. We decided on #mwikistaff to remove them. Comments could go to the talk page if you really need them. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 18:13, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | :::It was too full. We decided on #mwikistaff to remove them. Comments could go to the talk page if you really need them. - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 18:13, 6 October 2009 (EDT) | ||
| Line 244: | Line 242: | ||
Duirng the moving of Piranha Plant in the Generator to Polluted Piranha Plant, I noticed this. | Duirng the moving of Piranha Plant in the Generator to Polluted Piranha Plant, I noticed this. | ||
{{ | {{species infobox | ||
|title=Piranhacus Giganticus | |title=Piranhacus Giganticus | ||
|image=[[File:PiranhaPlantGenerator.png|200px]]<br>A '''Polluted Piranha Plant''' from ''Super Mario Sunshine'' | |image=[[File:PiranhaPlantGenerator.png|200px]]<br>A '''Polluted Piranha Plant''' from ''Super Mario Sunshine'' | ||
| Line 266: | Line 264: | ||
== User commentary on sections == | == User commentary on sections == | ||
{{SettledTPP}} | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ProposalOutcome|gray|withdrawn by proposer}} | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Commentaries by users are now '''''strongly discouraged''''' due to overload. | Commentaries by users are now '''''strongly discouraged''''' due to overload. | ||
| Line 297: | Line 294: | ||
==User commentary on sections (re-proposing)== | ==User commentary on sections (re-proposing)== | ||
{{SettledTPP}} | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ProposalOutcome|green|allow comments 9-0}} | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Commentaries by users are now '''''strongly discouraged''''' due to overload. | Commentaries by users are now '''''strongly discouraged''''' due to overload. | ||
| Line 346: | Line 342: | ||
==Make a separate subpage for levels== | ==Make a separate subpage for levels== | ||
{{SettledTPP}} | {{SettledTPP}} | ||
{{ProposalOutcome|red|do not make subpage for levels 1-7}} | |||
If there's a subpage for games, why not one for levels? I've seen plenty of silly things on level articles, so I think a separate subpage for levels should be created. | If there's a subpage for games, why not one for levels? I've seen plenty of silly things on level articles, so I think a separate subpage for levels should be created. | ||
| Line 368: | Line 363: | ||
This is somewhat related, but the reason the "Comments" header wouldn't show properly is that [[User:Rpg_gamer/sig|Rpg_gamer's signature]] from the section above was not coded properly (it doesn't have the <nowiki></break></nowiki> parameters at the end), so it messes up the coding for the rest of the page. I changed it to the standard <nowiki>{{User|Rpg_gamer}}</nowiki>, so the header should be fixed now.<br>{{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 23:19, 15 May 2013 (EDT) | This is somewhat related, but the reason the "Comments" header wouldn't show properly is that [[User:Rpg_gamer/sig|Rpg_gamer's signature]] from the section above was not coded properly (it doesn't have the <nowiki></break></nowiki> parameters at the end), so it messes up the coding for the rest of the page. I changed it to the standard <nowiki>{{User|Rpg_gamer}}</nowiki>, so the header should be fixed now.<br>{{User:LeftyGreenMario/sig}} 23:19, 15 May 2013 (EDT) | ||
== Make a separate subpage for places == | ==Make a separate subpage for places== | ||
{{SettledTPP}} | |||
{{ | {{ProposalOutcome|green|split 9-0}} | ||
I've noticed that quite a lot of the [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Other|Other]] section contains quite a lot of places. My proposal is simple, we create a subpage for places and place all the places in there. | I've noticed that quite a lot of the [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Other|Other]] section contains quite a lot of places. My proposal is simple, we create a subpage for places and place all the places in there. | ||
And yes, I am aware this proposal uses the word 'place' a lot. | And yes, I am aware this proposal uses the word 'place' a lot. | ||
'''Proposer''': {{User|Yoshi876}} | '''Proposer''': {{User|Yoshi876}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline''': June 18 2013, 23:59 (GMT) | '''Deadline''': June 18, 2013, 23:59 (GMT) | ||
===Create subpage=== | ===Create subpage=== | ||
| Line 384: | Line 378: | ||
#{{User|YoshiKong}} – Placing a vote at the place where this proposal about places is taking place. Per proposal BTW. | #{{User|YoshiKong}} – Placing a vote at the place where this proposal about places is taking place. Per proposal BTW. | ||
#{{User|ParaLemmy1234}} Per all. | #{{User|ParaLemmy1234}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|King Pikante}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Per my comment in the previous proposal. | |||
#{{User|Freakworld}} Per Proposal. | |||
#{{User|Gonzales Kart Inc.}} Placing where votes are to be placed so places subpage is placed in BJAODN. Oh yeah, and per all votes placed here. | |||
#{{User|Mariotime11}} Per all. | |||
===Don't create subpage=== | ===Don't create subpage=== | ||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
@Mega: We already have subpages for [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Characters|characters]], [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Enemies|enemies]], [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Games|games]], [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Items|items]], [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Luigi's Mansion|Luigi's Mansion]], [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Non-Mario content|non-Mario content]], and [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Proposals|proposals]], so I don't see the problem in creating a subpages for places. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | |||
:OK, I forgot about all those XD {{User:Gonzales Kart Inc./sig}} | |||
== Possible April Fools 2015 Stuff == | |||
Hi BJAODN, | |||
Can you put this material for April Fools next year? | |||
OK, here it is: | |||
TWO CANCELLED MARIO GAMES BASED OF THE DIC TV SHOWS: JUST LIKE THE STORY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF SONIC XTREME WENT: | |||
THE STORY BEGINS IN NOA WHEN A FRENCH DEV TEAM WANTS TO MAKE AND USE NINTENDO'S CHARACTERS TO BEAT SEGA'S SONIC CHAR. KING KOOPA'S KOOL GAME WAS A SEGA GENESIS GAME THAT WAS IN THE WORKS VERY SHORTLY AND SHOWN IN NP MAG 93'/2/19, IT SHOWED BOWSER GOING IN A CITY TURNING PEOPLE OF HOLLYWOOD TO KOOPAS OF KOOPAWOOD IT WAS CANCELLED BECAUSE IT WAS ON SEGA'S CONSOLE. WHY? BOWSER HATES MARIO AND SONIC HATES MARIO, THIS WAS BAD CHEMISTERY. | |||
THE NEXT GAME AND FINAL ONE WAS MARIO ALL STARS. NOT THE GAME, BUT BASED OFF THE COMPILATION MARIO TV SERIES. THE GAME FOCUSES ON THE 4 PLAYER TECHNIC THE PLAYERS CONTROL MARIO,LUIGI, TOAD THE PRINCESS AND YOSHI. IT WAS SHOWN AT NINTENDO'S 1993 CHAMPION TOURS AS A PLAYABLE DEMO WITH A STANGE ADAPTER FOR 4 PLAYERS ON SNES SMILAR TO THE NES SATELLITE. IN 1994, THE GAME HAD A FULL ON DEMO TO BRING HOME IT WAS ONLY AVILABLE IN LATIN AMERICA,BRAZIL,FRANCE AND KOREA IT WAS IN THE NINTENDO MAG THEY HAD IN THERE COUNTRY. IN 1995 THE GAME WAS 75% OF COMPLETION AND WAS TIMED OUT OF MAKING THE GAME NINTENDO WAS IMPRESSED AND CANCELLED IT FOR DELAY LIMTATIONS. | |||
THE LAST CANNED GAME WAS SUPER MARIO FX THE GAME WE KNOW NOT MUCH ABOUT BUT EXISTS IN HE DEV OF NINTENDO JAPAN THE GAME USED THE GAMES STYLE AND ENGINE FOR GAMEPLAY WITHIN 1995 AND 1996. THEN THE MOMENT CAME THE GAME WAS MOVED TO THE N64. THE CASTLE STILL EXISTS IN THE GAME WREAKING CREW 96' AS A LOST SPRITE FROM THIS GAME BUT MODDED FOR LATEST LOOK. | |||
Thanks for pranks. MARIOFAN900. | |||
:Maybe if you toned down the caps and used spell-check... but really, this isn't the place to do this. {{User:Mario/sig}} 20:56, 2 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
i waz in a rush THAT'S WHY!, MarioFan900. | |||
p.s. where do i do dis then? | |||
== "April Fool's Day" == | |||
I thought it was "April Fools' Day". [[User:Pokémon Trainer Red|PTR]] ([[User talk:Pokémon Trainer Red|talk]]) 21:22, 4 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
:Umm, yeah, and? {{User:Mario/sig}} 21:26, 4 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
::"Fools'" (with the apostrophe after the "s") is the correct spelling. <span style="font-family:Mario Party 2/3 Textbox">[[User:RickTommy|RickTommy]] ([[User talk:RickTommy|talk]])</span> 03:55, 23 November 2014 (EST) | |||
== Shadow Queen article in BJAODN? == | |||
Wow, this BJAODN article is actually a normal article, the only joke is the first two phrases in it, I don't see any other jokes in it. By the way, I think the [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Shadow Queen|BJAODN Shadow Queen]] looks better than the oroginal article, and also some elements on this joke page could be reused (and adapted) to the actual [[Shadow Queen]] article. Just as a side note, I tried to [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N2/Shadow Queen|feature]] Shadow Queen's page, but failed because of the article's size and flowery writing. Many elements in this joke page are forgotten in the actual true page, and if this page is flowery wrote, addaption to [[Shadow Queen]] won't be a problem. My main focus is the personality and Power and abilities sections.{{User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig}} | |||
== Improper captilization == | |||
Funny how the BJAODN page improperly capitalizes the following words "super mario wiki", in the first sentence no less. Can anyone who can edit the MarioWiki namespace fix this? [[File:Koopatrol sign.gif]][[User:ExPower|ExPower]][[File:Koopatrol sign.gif]] [[User talk:ExPower|talk]] 20:25, 12 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:That's the joke - [[User:Turboo|Turboo]] ([[User talk:Turboo|talk]]) 20:26, 12 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
== Is it ok to remove comments which aren't funny? == | |||
I've seen a few that either add nothing to the joke and even take away from it. I'm not trying to stop commenting, as it's just a few, but I'm just asking. {{User|Magikrazy}} | |||
:I've been on a comments cull before, go for it <s>unless it's one of mine</s>. Obviously though, as some people's humours are different some may get added back in. {{User|Yoshi876}} | |||
== 100m == | |||
I have a suggestion to add to BJAODN: | |||
Go to the 100m page for Donkey Kong and look at the bottom trivia. Something tells me that a Minecraft reference is not in any way important to the Donkey Kong stage itself. Quizmelon | |||
:I don't think it's funny enough to be in this, it sounds like it was added by a user who doesn't understand correlation =/= causation or coincidences. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 18:17, 21 May 2016 (EDT) | |||
== MK7 item boxes == | |||
I have a new thing that could fit on this page, found on the Item Box page. | |||
'Item Boxes return in Mario Kart 7 with the same design and purpose as Mario Kart Wii, with a rainbow-colored texture '''slightly less biased against the red area.'''' | |||
Colours being biased against? New to me, | |||
[[User:Quizmelon|Quizmelon]] ([[User talk:Quizmelon|talk]]) 02:00, 16 October 2016 (EDT) | |||
:That could work. {{User:The RPG Gamer/sig}} 02:01, 16 October 2016 (EDT) | |||
== Mistake == | |||
In the first sentence of this page, it says "super '''mairo''' wiki" instead of "Super Mario Wiki". I cannot fix this mistake because the page is protected. --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 11:04, 31 March 2017 (EDT) | |||
:You're not meant to fix the mistake, whoever did it intended to do it. {{User|Yoshi876}} | |||
::That's the joke, man. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 11:07, 31 March 2017 (EDT) | |||
:::Thanks, I did actually think that it was probably the case, since that is what the article it about, but I was unsure. --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 11:09, 31 March 2017 (EDT) | |||
== Mario Kart 9 == | |||
Unless the admins decide to delete it, please add [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Mario Kart 9|this page]] to the Complete "articles" section. That is a hefty amount of vandalism. -- {{User:Super Radio/Sig}} 12:34, 18 March 2018 (EDT) | |||
==I found bad writing on the begining of the article== | |||
It says 'on the super mairo wiki' and it hould be 'on the Super Mario Wiki'. {{User:YoshiEgg1990/sig}} 06:58, 13 June 2018 (EDT) | |||
:All of the mistakes on this overview page are intentional. {{User|Yoshi876}} | |||
== Criteria == | |||
Sometimes i feel like i add some stuff onto the archive that i find funny but gets removed. Is there a rule we can make to better explain what does and does not belong? [[User:The HD Guy|The HD Guy]] ([[User talk:The HD Guy|talk]]) 07:28, 30 August 2018 (EDT) | |||
== DK Wiki entries == | |||
Mind if we add some DK Wiki entries (if any)? Is there also a way to split the ''Donkey Kong'' series articles into its own section? [[User:Results May Vary|Results May Vary]] ([[User talk:Results May Vary|talk]]) 15:09, 15 January 2019 (EST) | |||
:As the DK Wiki is being merged to this wiki it would make sense to merge BJAODN-worthy content too. Luigi's Mansion has a BJAODN page, so it would most likely be spit into a separate page. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 15:27, 15 January 2019 (EST) | |||
== Allow section(s) for certain April Fools' proposals == | |||
{{SettledTPP}} | |||
{{ProposalOutcome|canceled}} | |||
This is something I've noticed twice now during April Fools (including this year's). Why is the main content of each April Fools' event archived but not the proposals? I propose that we also archive the various joke proposals as part of April Fools' on BJAODN (not '''every''' joke proposal that fits this category, obviously), though I'm also laying out two options for this: | |||
*'''Option 1:''' Archive as {{fake link|MarioWiki:BJAODN/April Fools' 20XX/Proposals}}. | |||
*'''Option 2:''' Archive as {{fake link|MarioWiki:BJAODN/April Fools' proposals}}. | |||
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Toadette the Achiever}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline:''' April 19, 2019, 23:59 GMT<br> | |||
'''Date Withdrawn:''' April 6, 2019, 14:14 GMT | |||
===Option 1=== | |||
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} This is my preferred option. While Option 2 is feasible, it would also result in page bloating. | |||
#{{User|TheDarkStar}} Per Toadette the Achiever. | |||
#{{User|FanOfYoshi}} That seems plausible. | |||
===Option 2=== | |||
===Do nothing=== | |||
#{{User|Alex95}} - Reason why we don't really archive the April Fools' proposals is because that page or the main [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Proposals|dumb proposals page]] would get bloated ''fast'' on April Fools'. And it wouldn't really even feel funny anymore, 'cause then people would just be posting on the proposals page silly things just for them to be archived and looked back at later (which you can do with the page history). One of the points of BJAODN is to "not write badly on purpose just to get into BJAODN", and this proposal would go against that. We're lenient on April Fools' because content on the Proposals page doesn't affect the mainspace (in this case). The only exception to this is Pie because <s>long live pie</s> legacy by Ghost Jam or something. | |||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} I feel like without any sort of regulation, this sort of thing would add up very, very quickly, leading to a very bloated page filled with nothing but joke proposals. One of the reasons Pie For Everyone worked was because it was the only joke proposal available that relied on an established legacy. There's a reason that all other parts of MarioWiki are curated so that only admins can tinker around with new article and stuff, because it increases the stuff to do to clean up afterward if every Tom, Dick, and Harry can do it. Joke curation isn't necessary to the upkeep of MarioWiki and thus we're better off just forbidding an official archive of it all together as a moderate dosage of joke proposals is fine, excessive is not. And in addition, per everything what Alex95 said. | |||
#{{User|Doomhiker}} This kind of against the spirit of BJAODN. If every April the first BJAODN is filled with what otherwise good users created, then what is the point of it? We should stick to not encouraging users to be put on BJAODN, April Fool's or not. Pie is different, as it is an administrator-created running gag to the level of Pirate Goomba being a Pirate Goomba. Per all. | |||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} I do not have a problem with allowing users to make April Fools proposals, but I’m not a fan of filling this article with a ton of joke proposals. Per Alex95. | |||
#{{user|Mario jc}} Per all. ''Anyone'' could then make an April Fools' proposal and have it archived, which will lead others to join the bandwagon as an excuse to have their joke kept in an official archive. The reason why the "main content" is archived is because it's much more large-scale and has far greater publicity, affecting the main page, CSS etc. whereas the proposals are community-centred. | |||
===Comments=== | |||
@Alex What about the other instances of "Pie?" [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:52, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Eh I think the pie thing should be more sparing each year, it's starting to get old. {{User:Bazooka Mario/sig}} 19:52, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:Why do you think I tried banning it? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:53, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::We only save Ghost Jam's, so up to him when he posts on on April Fools'. April Fools' is meant for dumb jokes anyway, but people can have fun on the Proposals page for the day with pretty much whatever they want. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 19:54, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:::@Alex95: Uh, '''everything else''' archived under April Fools' would '''also''' technically go against the spirit of "don't write badly on purpose", and I don't get your point either. This only applies to April Fools' proposals, and isn't meant to be an encouragement for April Fools' vandalism. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 19:56, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::::Looking through the archived proposals we have, they are either hilariously misguided or by people who didn't know where they were, or just hilariously written. Perhaps these were before we had the proposal archive? As for the currently archived April Fools' stuff, those are coordinated projects created by the administrative team, sometimes spread across multiple pages. This won't encourage vandalism, but I don't see the point in archiving ''every'' joke proposal. | |||
::::tl;dr really up to the admins what goes and what stays, but others may agree with you on this, idk. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 20:01, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:::::Yeah, I intend to leave some room for common sense over which proposals are archived. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 20:08, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:::::Can we have an alternate option where the objectively unfunny April Fool's thing from this year is wholly redacted? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:23, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::::::What exactly are you referring to? {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 20:26, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:::::::The whole "Pink Donkey Kong Jr." thing that for once I was far from the only person to complain about. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:28, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::::::::Humor is subjective. I personally enjoyed it. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 20:34, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:::::::::No one on the Main page's talk page came to defend it, with several people complaining. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:39, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
::::::::::Typically users don't really look at talk pages, tbh. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 20:42, April 5, 2019 (EDT) | |||
==Comments== | |||
A month ago, several comments were removed from the BJAODN for being late comments. I feel that some of the comments were actually pretty funny (I cannot say the same for my own), so I'd like to know why exactly late comments are bad if they're funny. {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 21:42, August 13, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:Usually it's because the humor has long since passed. It's still an enjoyable read, but it's the same thing as responding to an old talk page conversation (exceptions being unanswered talk posts that went ignored for eight months, for example). Sometimes there's something relevant to add, like on [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Characters#SIRI|SIRI]], but for the most part, it just isn't relevant anymore. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 18:22, April 29, 2020 (EDT) | |||
==Current-ness== | |||
Does writing added to the BJAODN need to be from the current revision, or is it fine to pull from earlier revisions for archive material? {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 19:50, October 11, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:I assume it's fine to use content from older revisions. That's probably where most of the content here comes from anyway, it'd be irresponsible to leave vandalism up because you're busy archiving it for BJAODN instead of going ahead and reverting it. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:07, April 10, 2020 (EDT) | |||
==Boom Blox== | |||
Now that Boom Blox has been merged to the general Non-Mario Content archive, can someone remove it from the list? --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 12:07, April 10, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:Done, thank you for pointing that out. --{{User:TheFlameChomp/sig}} 12:10, April 10, 2020 (EDT) | |||
== SuperMarioLogan Wiki == | |||
For your next April Fool's joke, I would like you to change the wiki's front page so that it is about SuperMarioLogan, a YouTube plush series, and have Jeffy as the featured article, a voting section on which Mario character should be in SuperMarioLogan, a fake news section depicting Logan Thirtyacre being the new owner of the wiki and a SuperMarioLogan video game being announced for the Nintendo Switch, and a DYK section about fun facts on SuperMarioLogan.--[[Special:Contributions/24.188.22.145|24.188.22.145]] 18:13, April 29, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:Maybe. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 18:19, April 29, 2020 (EDT) | |||
::By the way, the Jeffy page will have media relating to Jeffy's two rap songs, Why and Wanna See My Pencil.--[[Special:Contributions/24.44.76.88|24.44.76.88]] 19:07, May 1, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:::No, please don't. Do not give any credibility to that horrible man and his vulgar content. Logan is nothing but scum, and his Jeffy character is purely obnoxious. If you want a good April Fools' joke, make a [[Pink Gold Peach]] or [[Baby Rosalina]] wiki. - This previously unsigned comment was added by [[User:AwdryFan1997|AwdryFan1997]]. | |||
::::We should, because Logan's a hit plush YouTuber. The vulgar content will not be in the Jeffy page. There will also be a Scooter page with his rap song, Hey Fat Boy.--[[Special:Contributions/24.44.76.88|24.44.76.88]] 20:36, June 17, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:::::We will consider it. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:34, June 17, 2020 (EDT) | |||
== Logo == | |||
Why is the logo different in this page?{{unsigned|BlueYoshi-57EML}} | |||
:Because it can be. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 12:01, May 20, 2020 (EDT) | |||
== Add a new link to the main page. == | |||
As the main BJAODN page is protected, can someone who is able to edit it add in a [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Bedtime for Drain-Head!|link to my recently-created article on the poor state of the "Bedtime for Drain-Head" article]]? Thanks. - [[User:AwdryFan1997|AwdryFan1997]]([[User talk:AwdryFan1997|Talk]]) | |||
== The UnMarioWiki == | |||
Read this: [https://unmario.fandom.com/wiki/MarioWiki][https://unmario.fandom.com/wiki/Porplemontage], apparently, they insulted Wayoshi and Porple. [[User:DarkNight|DarkNight]] ([[User talk:DarkNight|talk]]) 17:25, July 22, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:What does this have to do with BJAODN? --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 17:42, July 22, 2020 (EDT) | |||
::We could include it. [[User:DarkNight|DarkNight]] ([[User talk:DarkNight|talk]]) 17:51, July 22, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:::BJAODN is just for what we cover. Also, they jab at everyone. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 18:11, July 22, 2020 (EDT) | |||
== Links in section headers == | |||
Should the links to the actual articles in section headers be removed according to the Manual of Style, or does that only apply to mainspace? --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 22:13, September 26, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:I think we should keep the header links, for the sake of historical preservation. - [[User:AwdryFan1997|AwdryFan1997]] ([[User talk:AwdryFan1997|talk]]) 18:18, December 3, 2020 (EST) | |||
::Agree. {{User:DarkNight/sig}} 18:23, December 3, 2020 (EST) | |||
:::Agreed also. [[User:Benjaminkirsc|Benjaminkirsc]] ([[User talk:Benjaminkirsc|talk]]) 18:26, December 3, 2020 (EST) | |||
::::That rule should only apply to the mainspace. {{User:Keyblade Master/sig}} | |||
:::::I think it's fine to leave them as-is here. It'll help lead readers to the article the excerpt came from, and can show them how the article should actually look. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 18:37, December 3, 2020 (EST) | |||
== 2022 joke idea == | |||
Change of plans with my prank wiki idea. We will not do an SML Wiki for next year because SML had to get rid of all Mario characters thanks to Nintendo. We will instead be doing an SMG4 wiki for our 2022 April Fool's joke because this channel still has Mario characters in it. The featured article will be about the SMG4 version of Mario, the news section including fake news regarding Meta Runner and Sunset Paradise video games for the Switch and Luke Lerdwichagul being the wiki's new owner, and a poll stating which SMG4 character is your favorite. I hope you go with my idea.--[[Special:Contributions/24.44.76.88|24.44.76.88]] 20:26, July 20, 2021 (EDT) | |||
:We actually have a list of ideas for the next decade we're pulling from, but we can probably slide that in around 202 or so. {{User:Alex95/sig}} 21:39, July 20, 2021 (EDT) | |||
::Update: The SMG4 Wiki's front page will also have a Murder Drones game for the Nintendo Switch.--[[Special:Contributions/24.44.76.88|24.44.76.88]] 20:29, October 21, 2021 (EDT) | |||
== Super Mario Odyssey 2 page for April fools == | |||
Can anyone writes it? | |||
general direction: | |||
*It is a boring rehash of original | |||
*No New Kingdoms(except Isle Delfino) | |||
*Bad Reputation | |||
*The games is linear unlike the first one | |||
*Not much new capture | |||
*Have 999,999 moons | |||
*30 locations | |||
*Multiple location with in the same kingdom | |||
*Kingdom name changed, but everything else is the same | |||
--[[Special:Contributions/112.119.179.118|112.119.179.118]] 09:39, March 31, 2022 (EDT) | |||
== SMG4 for 2023 == | |||
I've decided to move my SMG4 joke idea for 2023. It'll still be the same as in the 2022 proposal idea.--[[Special:Contributions/24.44.76.188|24.44.76.188]] 19:57, July 27, 2022 (EDT) | |||
:OK, but maybe you could add stuff like a SMG4 crossover, or a multiverse madness/generations sort of thing. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} 10:14, December 14, 2022. | |||
== A question I have == | |||
What is and is not worthy of being archived here?--[[Special:Contributions/74.64.68.192|74.64.68.192]] | |||
:The page itself pretty much has your question covered. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 14:10, October 31, 2022 (EDT) | |||
::I tried to add two additions to the Enemies part of the archive, but they weren't considered worthy.--[[Special:Contributions/74.64.68.192|74.64.68.192]] | |||
:::They need to be funny. And while that's subjective, those...just weren't. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 19:33, October 31, 2022 (EDT) | |||
::::A bit off topic, but you also [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?diff=3782882&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop put a comment and signed it with someone else's username]. Do not impersonate other users. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 21:45, October 31, 2022 (EDT) | |||
:::::Pretty sure they just copied my [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Grindel&type=revision&diff=3523878&oldid=3523875 edit summary] from when I reverted it, and didn't mean it to be impersonation. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 21:56, October 31, 2022 (EDT) | |||
::::::No, I didn't mean to impersonate. And everyone has a different view of what's funny. P.S. What does the Grindel joke even ''mean?'' I know who the raysfire guy is, but not the connection to Grindel.--[[Special:Contributions/74.64.68.192|74.64.68.192]] | |||
== Wait... == | |||
Levels are technically places. Like, if levels were like buildings, worlds would be like blocks or cities. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} December 6, 2022 13:48(CST) | |||
:What does this have to do with BJAODN? The levels are listed in [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Locations]]. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 15:07, December 6, 2022 (EST) | |||
::I was talking about the 2 proposals on this page. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} 10:14, December 8, 2022 (CST) | |||
:::A place (i.e. [[Toad Town]]) is different from a level (i.e. [[World 1-1 (Super Mario Bros.)|World 1-1]]). --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 19:03, December 8, 2022 (EST) | |||
::::And yet, 1-1 is in World 1, which is in the Mushroom Kingdom. Toad Town is also in the Mushroom Kingdom. AND, every game has articles for their worlds and levels. If it is done in the main wiki, it should be done in BJAODN. {{User|SONIC123CDMANIA+&K(B&ATSA)}} 11:14, December 9, 2022 (CST) | |||
== Text-replacement bot is having an effect on Bjaodn entries == | |||
With the porple bot replacing text, it's also affecting the bjaodn entries. I am in suspicion. See sal out (Mike's theme) and anything that had Mario (franchise) on it. Should we recover those accidently bot-replaced text? {{User:PnnyCrygr/sig}} 05:47, August 4, 2023 (EDT) | |||
== "No impertinent content" rule == | |||
"''[...]Such content may include entire articles, sections of articles, or "joke" proposals, but may only be taken from valid wiki articles or proposals. Content derived from user talk pages or any other namespace is not allowed under any circumstances and will be removed on sight.''" | |||
However, there are some breakers to this rule: (File) (Gallery) (Talk) (Template) etc. pages are in the BJAODN sections, esp. the /Other subpage. Here is a list to clarify; sorry if i missed any that start with "Namespace:Page": | |||
*File:Booblast.jpg | |||
*File:Bowser on Koopa King kart MKDD.png | |||
*File:FeezingTower.jpg | |||
*File:Goombario Tattling Paratroopa PMTTYD.png | |||
*File:Mario Party 2 Face Lift.png | |||
*File:Mario Party Star Rush Shogakukan.jpg | |||
*File:OnevsOne.png | |||
*File:SSB Beta Saffron City.jpg | |||
*Gallery:Donkey Kong Country | |||
*Gallery:Food | |||
*Gallery:Mario Kart 64 | |||
*Gallery:Mario Party | |||
*Gallery:Mario Party Advance | |||
*Gallery:Mario Party DS | |||
*Gallery:Mario sprites and models | |||
*Gallery:Super Princess Peach | |||
*'''Talk:'''Dr. Tornado | |||
*'''Talk:'''Mama Toad | |||
*'''Talk:'''Princess Peach | |||
*'''Talk:'''Meat | |||
*Template:Award-winner | |||
*Template:Userspace | |||
The (talk) namespace entries on BJAODN are the major offenders and must be discouraged from being submitted, as with the (User talk) entries; a section on "User talk:Alex95" was removed from the BJAODN archives as per this impertinent content rule. Which namespaces aside from (Talk) should be removed from the archives, specifically? (File) (Gallery) (Template) (MarioWiki) (Help) | |||
{{User:PnnyCrygr/sig}} 06:40, January 1, 2024 (EST) | |||
:It's clearly a dated rule and should be either reduced in scope to limit content from talk pages (with rare exceptions), or treated like an extension of "don't create bad content on purpose" and otherwise removed all together. {{User:Mario/sig}} 12:52, January 1, 2024 (EST) | |||
::Rewrote it.[https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:BJAODN&diff=4121757&oldid=4119951] Hopefully that should clear it up. I don't think we'll delete any content from those namespaces, as several of these (such as Talk:Meat) does qualify as "something so confusing and devoid of information that you become suspicious of the writer's sanity" {{User:Mario/sig}} 19:00, January 22, 2024 (EST) | |||
== The user comments kinda suck == | |||
{{talk}} | |||
I've never been a fan of how comments are integrated among BJAODN entries, because it's often done with reckless abandon which causes them to blend into the rest of their respective entries. The comments, imo, should be more neatly incorporated; I was thinking that we should reach a consensus on a more suitable format for these comments. I'd personally favor giving them a forum-y touch, so my idea is to encase them in a cream-colored box, separate them with lines, and (where applicable) move each comment's signature above the comment itself, like so: | |||
<div class="contentbox mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"> | |||
<h2>Pirate Goomba</h2> | |||
[[File:Pirate Goomba.png|thumb|Pirate Goomba.]] | |||
Pirate Goomba is a pirate Goomba. | |||
{{br}} | |||
<div style="float:left; border:1px solid #f5d3b0;background:#fffdd0;padding:2px; ; margin: 0 auto;"> | |||
(''It should be noted that this line quickly became a running gag around the Super Mario Wiki.'') | |||
</div>{{br}} | |||
<h2>Toad (species)</h2> | |||
Toads dont appear in ''[[New Super Mario Bros.]]'', in the intro, the small things panicking aren't toads, they are toadsworths. Nintendo probably didnt want to make a new model just for toad, and used toadsworth's model instead. Toadsworth also appear in mushroom houses. | |||
<div style="float:left; border:1px solid #f5d3b0;background:#fffdd0;padding:2px; ; margin: 0 auto;"> | |||
'''{{User|Baby Luigi}}:'''<br>(''While the information is [https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=QjsRFX-c4h8 technically correct], the way this is worded, unsourced, and taken out of context makes this sound like completely nonsense.'') | |||
</div>{{br}} | |||
---- | |||
Althought the Toads are occasionally depicted as happy in some artworks, there are differences: Toadette '''rarely''' winks '''usually'''. Toads are '''never''' seen winking like this. | |||
<div style="float:left; border:1px solid #f5d3b0;background:#fffdd0;padding:2px; ; margin: 0 auto;"> | |||
'''{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}}:'''<br>("''So, uh, how often, exactly?''" | |||
---- | |||
(Later, it would be re-added as this:) | |||
</div>{{br}} | |||
Although the Toads are depicted a being happy in some artworks, there are differences. Toadette '''flirtatiously''' winks when depicted in several artworks, which is not present in any games the Toads appeared. | |||
<div style="float:left; border:1px solid #f5d3b0;background:#fffdd0;padding:2px; ; margin: 0 auto;"> | |||
([[File:Toadette MLPJ.png|100px]][[File:Toadette111.png|80px]]<big><big>←Like this'''???'''</big></big>) | |||
</div>{{br}} | |||
</div> | |||
---- | |||
These two examples are lifted from the [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Characters]] page. You'll notice that, outside of relocating the signatures and removing a hyphen that separated one comment from its signature, I didn't tamper with the original formatting and punctuation of any comment. | |||
Obviously this would get cumbersome to format manually over and over, so a template would come in clutch: | |||
<pre> | |||
{{BJAODN comments | |||
|user1= | |||
|comment1= | |||
|user2= | |||
|comment2= | |||
|user3= | |||
|comment3= | |||
etc. | |||
</pre> | |||
(The "user" parameters are optional.) | |||
What does everyone think? Keep in mind that this format is so far just a suggestion; any feedback is appreciated. If a consensus proves difficult to reach, I'll proceed with a proposal. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 16:12, January 21, 2024 (EST) Edit: Made the borders around the comments thinner. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 16:17, January 21, 2024 (EST) | |||
:I'm okay with it. It looks lots better and makes the comments stand out more noticeably. [[User:Super Mario RPG|Super Mario RPG]] ([[User talk:Super Mario RPG|talk]]) 16:16, January 21, 2024 (EST) | |||
Note: I use a custom wiki skin where the text is superimposed on a dark background, which renders the "Comments" labels illegible in the cream boxes. When logged out, I notice that these labels stick out too much; perhaps we could do without the labels and let the cream background itself suggest a comment section, like a post-it note of sorts? Example: | |||
<div style="float:left; border:1px solid #f5d3b0;background:#fffdd0;padding:2px; ; margin: 0 auto;"> | |||
'''{{user|Doc von Schmeltwick}}:'''<br>("''So, uh, how often, exactly?''" | |||
---- | |||
(Later, it would be re-added as this:) | |||
</div>{{br}} | |||
{{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 16:24, January 21, 2024 (EST) Edit:Fully removed the Comments labels to better illustrate the current vision. See [https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki_talk:BJAODN&diff=4121063&oldid=4121061 this revision] if you're curious how the comment boxes used to look like. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 17:13, January 21, 2024 (EST) | |||
:Great idea, and the template is great. Maybe someday, we could enforce this BJAODN comments template in all of the BJAODN archives. {{User:PnnyCrygr/sig}} 17:06, January 21, 2024 (EST) | |||
:Looks good to me! [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 17:19, January 21, 2024 (EST) | |||
Maybe you can create a proposal about this to see what the community thinks. I personally like this idea! {{User:Sparks/sig}} 17:21, January 21, 2024 (EST) | |||
:I'd be up for a proposal! [[User:SolemnStormcloud|SolemnStormcloud]] ([[User talk:SolemnStormcloud|talk]]) 18:05, January 21, 2024 (EST) | |||
::I understand the concern for readability, but I think these colored boxes draw attention to the commentary rather than the content they're riffing on, which the content I think should be the focus of these pages. {{User:Mario/sig}} 18:52, January 22, 2024 (EST) | |||
:::Yeah, even before you added your comment I was having second thoughts about this addition. The post-it format fills up too much space and, although not garish, still hampers readability. The original format, despite its shortcomings, has the net advantage of being more discreet, and has endured for so long because there's seldom anything you could do to improve it without adding superfluous elements. (Wikipedia's BJAODN uses pretty much the same comment "system" except it seems to have a bespoke "reply" button.) I will admit: this topic was more of a stream-of-consciousness than a well thought-out and researched proposition. I decided I won't set up a proposal anymore, but seeing as though the suggested format still got some positive reception, I'd be okay with somebody else making a proposal in my stead. {{User:Koopa con Carne/Sig}} 20:12, January 22, 2024 (EST) | |||