MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Princess Peach

Princess PeachEdit


This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.

Princess Peach became unfeatured at 15:45, 15 April 2014.

Remove Featured Article StatusEdit

  1. Ashley and Red (talk)I featured tge article last time, but, looking better....There are issues: Mario Tennis, and Baseball sections could be expanded. There are some speculation on Rekationships section (Love interest with Luigi??Toadette's good friend?). It could have more images. Also, Paper Mario Sections are in past tense, while should be in present. The abilities section is too much large, and could have a trim. The same applies to Relationships, Mario Kart series, and other ones. I know that peiple (including me) had a lot of work to get it featured...but isn't a better aricle than Pauline, and has similar issues of Daisy.
  2. DaisyLuigi (talk) Per Ashley, but for the most part, it's a great article. Make it better, add more features, and I will nominate it to stay featured.
  3. Vommack (talk) Per Ashley and Daisy. These "expansions" are just VERY minor trimming, and nothing is being done to actually enhance the quality of the article.
  4. Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Per Ashley And Red.
  5. Yoshi876 (talk) Per Ashley in the nomination and Vommack in the comments.
  6. Mario (talk) Once those sections are improved, the article should still be in construction before it can be featured. Her personality section also needs to include more information (no mention of Super Mario Adventures, where she is shown to be a self-sufficient badass compared to the games).

Keep Featured Article StatusEdit

Removal of Support/Oppose VotesEdit


I am going to edit this article to make it better. --  New Supermatt Bros.  01:08, 5 April 2014 (EDT)

Go right ahead!   It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 02:40, 5 April 2014 (EDT)
This is great!!User:Ashley and Red/sig
Look at the history of the article. --  New Supermatt Bros.  19:51, 7 April 2014 (EDT)
That is adding a few links, that is not expansion. Yoshi876 (talk)
What Yoshi said. All you've done is add links and changed the wording around to make the article marginally longer.--Vommack (talk) 19:56, 7 April 2014 (EDT)
Of course I shall expand the article. --  New Supermatt Bros.  19:58, 7 April 2014 (EDT)
I don't think you're getting this...The article isn't improving. Length is not the issue, and even if it was, adding in awkward wording to increase its length slightly wouldn't solve it. --Vommack (talk) 15:34, 8 April 2014 (EDT)