MarioWiki:Featured articles/N4/Princess Peach: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Ashley and Red}}OK. This article is full of info, and I reviewed jt by myself, it covers all her appearances. The article is well written, '''all''' in present tense, plus, have a good amount of images. The relationships article looks well divided, in this way. Her " | #{{User|Ashley and Red}}OK. This article is full of info, and I reviewed jt by myself, it covers all her appearances. The article is well written, '''all''' in present tense, plus, have a good amount of images. The relationships article looks well divided, in this way. Her "Etymology/Name" section covers all the necessary info, and I can't find speculation anywhere. The article growed up since the last nomination (made by me, and the unfeature by me too). I also want to give special attention to the best sections, The Paper Mario and the Mario & Luigi ones, that are very well detailed. I also added more "Other Appearances" that were lacking, and made minor edits here and there. Oh, by the way, the Mario Party and the Mario Kart sections look trimmed enough, and detailed at the same time. | ||
#{{User|Smash Bros}} | #{{User|Smash Bros}} | ||
Even though I don't like Peach, (which is not why we're here) support. The article is perfectly info filled, and has a good amount of quality pictures. | Even though I don't like Peach, (which is not why we're here) support. The article is perfectly info filled, and has a good amount of quality pictures. [[User:+-~Rosetta~-+|+-~Rosetta~-+]] ([[User talk:+-~Rosetta~-+|talk]]) 20:34, 25 November 2014 (EST) | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Revision as of 21:34, November 25, 2014
Princess Peach
Support
- Ashley and Red (talk)OK. This article is full of info, and I reviewed jt by myself, it covers all her appearances. The article is well written, all in present tense, plus, have a good amount of images. The relationships article looks well divided, in this way. Her "Etymology/Name" section covers all the necessary info, and I can't find speculation anywhere. The article growed up since the last nomination (made by me, and the unfeature by me too). I also want to give special attention to the best sections, The Paper Mario and the Mario & Luigi ones, that are very well detailed. I also added more "Other Appearances" that were lacking, and made minor edits here and there. Oh, by the way, the Mario Party and the Mario Kart sections look trimmed enough, and detailed at the same time.
- Smash Bros (talk)
Even though I don't like Peach, (which is not why we're here) support. The article is perfectly info filled, and has a good amount of quality pictures. +-~Rosetta~-+ (talk) 20:34, 25 November 2014 (EST)
