MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mystic Forest: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Removal of Opposes: With the oppose vote retracted, the removal votes are unneeded) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{fa-archive}} | ||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Icemario11}} Well-written, detailed descriptions of each level for the world with no (as far as I can tell) spelling or grammar mistakes present, and isn't at all a stub. | #{{User|Icemario11}} Well-written, detailed descriptions of each level for the world with no (as far as I can tell) spelling or grammar mistakes present, and isn't at all a stub. Few red links, has wide range of good quality images and no improvement tags. I fail to see why this shouldn't become a featured article. | ||
#{{User|Ztar Power}} | |||
#{{User|WeHatePoisonMushrooms66}} | |||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
I read the first parts of the article and the grammar isn't too bad. However, you tend to make quite lengthy sentences. I also trimmed some space on the article. {{User|Baby Luigi}} | I read the first parts of the article and the grammar isn't too bad. However, you tend to make quite lengthy sentences. I also trimmed some space on the article. {{User|Baby Luigi}} | ||
@Mr.L1998: "Minor" is subjective, and this isn't talking about the articles content itself, but rather about the quality of the article. You can never have too much images in a gallery too: they help paint a picture of what the subject is about, and we're better as visual learners. The only valid oppose is the opening is too short....that could be fixed {{User|Baby Luigi}} | :@Mr.L1998: "Minor" is subjective, and this isn't talking about the articles content itself, but rather about the quality of the article. You can never have too much images in a gallery too: they help paint a picture of what the subject is about, and we're better as visual learners. The only valid oppose is the opening is too short....that could be fixed {{User|Baby Luigi}} | ||
Good. Once you expand the opening paragraph, it will be even better. I will check the article for further errors and some word cutting. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
::It's a bit wordy on some parts, and the sentences can be stringy and repetitive. That's all the issues I see, though, considering that I've read the whole article. Despite this, you did a great job in this article and it's good we have people devoting their time to create detailed articles like this. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
Latest revision as of 17:02, May 16, 2018
Mystic Forest[edit]
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Support[edit]
- Icemario11 (talk) Well-written, detailed descriptions of each level for the world with no (as far as I can tell) spelling or grammar mistakes present, and isn't at all a stub. Few red links, has wide range of good quality images and no improvement tags. I fail to see why this shouldn't become a featured article.
- Ztar Power (talk)
- WeHatePoisonMushrooms66 (talk)
- LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- Yoshi876 (talk)
Oppose[edit]
Removal of Opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
I read the first parts of the article and the grammar isn't too bad. However, you tend to make quite lengthy sentences. I also trimmed some space on the article. Baby Luigi (talk)
- @Mr.L1998: "Minor" is subjective, and this isn't talking about the articles content itself, but rather about the quality of the article. You can never have too much images in a gallery too: they help paint a picture of what the subject is about, and we're better as visual learners. The only valid oppose is the opening is too short....that could be fixed Baby Luigi (talk)
Good. Once you expand the opening paragraph, it will be even better. I will check the article for further errors and some word cutting. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- It's a bit wordy on some parts, and the sentences can be stringy and repetitive. That's all the issues I see, though, considering that I've read the whole article. Despite this, you did a great job in this article and it's good we have people devoting their time to create detailed articles like this. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
