MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Grubba: Difference between revisions

MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Grubba (view source)

Revision as of 14:44, January 21, 2009

1,520 bytes added , 15 years ago

→‎Comments

Stumpers

Autopatrolled users

5,521

edits

@@ Line 76: / Line 76: @@
 Wait...so Grubba was never champion of the Glitz Pit? -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
 :To the best of my knowledge, he was. Unless there's some lost test somewhere...? {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 23:31, 20 January 2009 (EST)
 ::Well according to the article now, he was the creator and manager of the Glitz Pit and never a fighter there.  What is right? -- {{User|Son of Suns}}
+:::I actually found the game's script and went through it.  However, the script did not include the side conversations like those in the bar or Bandy's observations.  However, according to what Grubba actually says to Mario, he was a martial arts fighter and became manager after he could no longer fight.  The Glitz Pit is a "combat sport" arena.  I'm trying to remember if the Glitz Pit is ''explicitly'' created by him, but I do know this from the script: Jolene's little brother, Prince Mush, was the FIRST champion, so it's a very new arena.  No previous owner is ever mentioned.  When Mush disappeared, Rawk Hawk became the champion of the pit, followed by Mario.  So, unless we want to say that the sixty-year-old Grubba could defeat Rawk Hawk, Mush's rival, in battle, then no, he was not a champion of the Glitz Pit.  About the images, there is only ONE image of questionable quality (remember our images are supposed to be low resolution for them to be '''fair, legal use'''), but we must consider this regulation: "…include a reasonable number of images of good quality '''if said images are available'''."  Feel free to prove me wrong by finding a higher quality image, but I believe that's as high of quality that you're going to find.  So, unless you feel that you can obtain a better image of Grubba defeated or can name a website that has one, I'd like to request that you remove that part of your oppose.  The other part is a very good point, though. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 13:44, 21 January 2009 (EST)