Talk:Wario's mother

I don't think blooper reels are supposed to be taken seriously, they just made it that way to be funny. I don't think that version of the blooper reel is canon anyway.Knife (talk) 23:32, 4 March 2007 (EST)

I'm putting this up for merging unless someone can prove that blooper reel is canon.Knife (talk) 00:38, 5 March 2007 (EST)

What is the BLooper Reel anyway? Paper Jorge (Talk·Contribs)

Argue to keep as seperate article

The burden of proof lies with proving it isn't canon, not the inverse. Furthermore, Wario's Mother is listed categorically as an implied character, much like King K. Rool's wife and Hamma Jamma's father and grandfather. We know he has to have parents anyway, but the fact that she was mentioned, I believe, more than merits an article. Additionally, a merge with the main Mario Power Tennis article doesn't seem practical. Additionally, Link appeared in Super Mario RPG, technically, and I highly doubt his appearance is "canon", yet we acknowledge him for this appearance. How much more should we acknowledge an actual Mario character, canon or otherwise? To me the game's mention is adequette. ChrisAlassal 00:51, 5 March 2007 (EST)

You, know he sort of got a point.... -- Sir Grodus

Also is this some kind of fake hilarious made-up Bloopers (not the octopus kind) that "appeared during" the making of the game? If so then it is canon. Because it DID happen during the "making of the game" and Wario odes have a mother. Paper Jorge (Talk·Contribs)