Category talk:Pokémon series: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Sir Grodus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
What if we put Character Attacks as well. Will that be good enough? {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} | What if we put Character Attacks as well. Will that be good enough? {{User:Pokemon DP/sig}} | ||
I don't know, a lot of the attacks are exclusive to the Super Smash Bros. series, meaning they probably never actually appeared in the games the character originates from. -- [[User: Sir Grodus|Sir Grodus]] |
Revision as of 00:33, June 16, 2007
I think we shouldn't have these categories and just stick with the Super Smash Bros. ones (Characters/Enemies/Bosses/Places/Items). Anyone agree? -- Sir Grodus
They're closely-related, but extremely limited on their own. -- Booster
I did this to help people know which item came from which series easier. I didn't even know where the Maxim Tomato came from. So I made this to help. My Bloody Valentine
The Super Smash Bros. ones work fine, as thats basicly the only connection most of these things have to Mario. Creating articles solely on their series seems sort of pointless. Whats next, Pac-Man, Sonic the Hedgehog, Tamagotchi, Final Fantasy, Perfect Dark (Cloaking Device and Motion-Sensor Bomb), etc. categories. It could be stated in the articles where the stuff comes from. -- Sir Grodus
But with the release of Super Smash Bros. Brawl soon, we will definitely see a lot more outside concepts come in. So shouldn't these stay? My Bloody Valentine
Maybe we should have, I don't know, a vote or something to help decide this. Having categories on every series, it just seems wrong. -- Sir Grodus
What if we put Character Attacks as well. Will that be good enough? My Bloody Valentine
I don't know, a lot of the attacks are exclusive to the Super Smash Bros. series, meaning they probably never actually appeared in the games the character originates from. -- Sir Grodus