25,124
edits
MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
→Comments
| Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
::[http://twitter.com/SMWikiOfficial/status/915759780354052096 Official content is official content], no matter what form it takes. What should be debated here is whether or not it should be covered in full. For the moment, I'm leaning towards giving it a separate page, simply because it ''was'' bought by Nintendo and is therefore an official product. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 01:20, 12 November 2017 (EST) | ::[http://twitter.com/SMWikiOfficial/status/915759780354052096 Official content is official content], no matter what form it takes. What should be debated here is whether or not it should be covered in full. For the moment, I'm leaning towards giving it a separate page, simply because it ''was'' bought by Nintendo and is therefore an official product. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 01:20, 12 November 2017 (EST) | ||
:::Legal definitions are messy. I mean, the Mario IP was licensed to those who made the [[:Category:Edutainment Games]] for DOS, PC, NES, and SNES, but that doesn't mean that the games are owned by Nintendo are official. Maybe I am wrong about that. The point is the original author isn't Nintendo and yet giving credit to them as if they were because they bought the film rights isn't quite right to then label it as "official". Legalities isn't the only measure of being official. I think that Nintendo has long since forgotten those licensed instances of the Mario franchise. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 01:34, 12 November 2017 (EST) | :::Legal definitions are messy. I mean, the Mario IP was licensed to those who made the [[:Category:Edutainment Games]] for DOS, PC, NES, and SNES, but that doesn't mean that the games are owned by Nintendo are official. Maybe I am wrong about that. The point is the original author isn't Nintendo and yet giving credit to them as if they were because they bought the film rights isn't quite right to then label it as "official". Legalities isn't the only measure of being official. I think that Nintendo has long since forgotten those licensed instances of the Mario franchise. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 01:34, 12 November 2017 (EST) | ||
::::Yeah TT the only way it's official is that Nintendo literally owns it and tell me what does that really mean? {{User|Chester Alan Arthur}} | |||
@TimeTurner: Oh. My bad. I had no idea. I should probably think twice before I start shooting my mouth off for no reason. {{User:Lcrossmk8/sig}} 18:35, 12 November 2017 (EST) | @TimeTurner: Oh. My bad. I had no idea. I should probably think twice before I start shooting my mouth off for no reason. {{User:Lcrossmk8/sig}} 18:35, 12 November 2017 (EST) | ||