MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/List of shops in Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars: Difference between revisions

I don't know if I'm doing this correctly, but I hope so.
m (Formatting)
(I don't know if I'm doing this correctly, but I hope so.)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
{{fa-archive}}
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=08:21, 31 July 2014
|passed=02:15, 1 August 2014
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} It's a place to spam tables that involve no images or particular information on anything that's useful. ''A few are not even technically considered shops such as the Swap Shop'' If that speculation is the case, then why is it here in the first place? This article only has one paragraph that simply describes shops in general with little detail. There isn't even images for the items. How am I supposed to know what a [[Crystalline]] looks like? The descriptions are too simple as well. It could at least say "Healing Item" "Boosting Item" or "Special Item" instead of "Item" "Item" "Item". The descriptions for the shops aren't great either. They're extremely vague and hard to make sense of. Yes, maybe this looked like a great article half a decade ago. Nowadays, we have articles that are better than this and aren't featured. So is this the best the wiki has to offer? Not anymore.
#{{User|Ninelevendo}} It's a place to spam tables that involve no images or particular information on anything that's useful. ''A few are not even technically considered shops such as the Swap Shop'' If that speculation is the case, then why is it here in the first place? This article only has one paragraph that simply describes shops in general with little detail. There isn't even images for the items. How am I supposed to know what a [[Crystalline]] looks like? The descriptions are too simple as well. It could at least say "Healing Item" "Boosting Item" or "Special Item" instead of "Item" "Item" "Item". The descriptions for the shops aren't great either. They're extremely vague and hard to make sense of. Yes, maybe this looked like a great article half a decade ago. Nowadays, we have articles that are better than this and aren't featured. So is this the best the wiki has to offer? Not anymore.
5,246

edits