MarioWiki talk:Warning policy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→In case of improper usage of template?: new section) |
(→Questioning why we have "Admin only" warnings: new section) |
||
| Line 239: | Line 239: | ||
What warnings do users receive in case of misuse of reminder template? Improper issuing of a template without knowledge that it is misuse. [[User:Windy|Windy]] ([[User talk:Windy|talk]]) 17:26, July 14, 2023 (EDT) | What warnings do users receive in case of misuse of reminder template? Improper issuing of a template without knowledge that it is misuse. [[User:Windy|Windy]] ([[User talk:Windy|talk]]) 17:26, July 14, 2023 (EDT) | ||
== Questioning why we have "Admin only" warnings == | |||
*"Undermining admin authority" | |||
This is absolutely meaningless. The most I've come across for what exactly constitutes this is in [[MarioWiki:Courtesy]], which probably should be linked to there for a definition, but I'll critique this rule later. | |||
*"Creating sockpuppets" | |||
It's understandable that sometimes evidence requires use of admin tools such as CheckUser but I see little reason this should be restricted to only sysops. | |||
*"Abusing warning privileges" | |||
Any user should be able to warn other users over abusing warning templates. | |||
So yeah I counted three of these warnings. The rule that only users with colored text are allowed to use these is just a questionable layer of process and probably should just be removed. {{User:Mario/sig}} 12:49, May 18, 2024 (EDT) | |||
