13,290
edits
Line 420: | Line 420: | ||
However, the way the two articles are currently organizated is nightmarishly poor. There's barely any information, and yet it wants it seems to want to be ridiculously indepth (100% Item Collection Guide?). I say we should take clue from the basic way the Transformers Wiki handled their [http://tfwiki.net/wiki/GoBot_(Tonka) article] about a similarly distantly-related, competing brand. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 07:59, 29 December 2008 (EST) | However, the way the two articles are currently organizated is nightmarishly poor. There's barely any information, and yet it wants it seems to want to be ridiculously indepth (100% Item Collection Guide?). I say we should take clue from the basic way the Transformers Wiki handled their [http://tfwiki.net/wiki/GoBot_(Tonka) article] about a similarly distantly-related, competing brand. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 07:59, 29 December 2008 (EST) | ||
:Well, see, the whole GoBots/Transformers things is the opposite of what we have with Banjo/Conker. GoBots started out as a competitor of Transformers but it's fictional universe was slowing integrated into Transformers. | |||
IMO, what we should have is an informative, but not too in-depth description of the individual games and the fictional universe, aswell as the real-life history of the series, and a section listing the Mario references (If there's any). We don't need to have sections on the characters/worlds/items ect. That's just filler. --[[User:Blitzwing|Blitzwing]] 12:12, 29 December 2008 (EST) |