MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/36: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "List of ('')?Mario('')? references" to "List of references"
(archiving the archive)
m (Text replacement - "List of ('')?Mario('')? references" to "List of references")
(46 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive Template}}
{{MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/Template}}


<div style="font-size:95%">__TOC__</div>
<div style="font-size:95%">__TOC__</div>


===Make "List of Quotes by Character" Pages===
===Make "List of Quotes by Character" Pages===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">MAKE CHARACTER QUOTE PAGES 12-0</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|12-0|make character quote pages}}
I think we should make "List of Quotes by Character" pages (with "Character" being replaced by the name of a specific character). All the information will go onto a Writing Guideline eventually, but in the meantime, I'll just provide the main ideas here for reference...


I think we should make "List of Quotes by Character" pages (with "Character" being replaced by the name of a specific character). All the information will go onto a Writing Guideline eventually, but in the mantime, I'll just provide the main ideas here for reference...
These pages would only be for recurring characters, as oneshot characters already have complete quote lists on their parent games' pages. Discretion should also be used when determining what recurring characters should get quotes pages. If a character is major in one game, but only has a few lines in another game or two, there is no point giving them a quote page either: just give them a Quotes section with {{tem|main}} to the major appearance, as well as some choice quotes from that and all the quotes from the minor appearance. Similarly, if a character appears in many games, but they only have a couple lines in each one, just compile them into a small list that fits in a single Quotes section (like how no separate list pages are needed when there's only one or two glitches or beta elements). Character with quotes list pages should also get Quotes sections linking to the lists with {{tem|Main}}, with a small sample of notable or characteristic (oft-repeated) quotes (in accordance with [[MarioWiki:Empty sections]]).


These pages would only be for recurring characters, as oneshot characters already have complete quote lists on their parent games' pages. Discretion should also be used when determining what recurring characters should get quotes pages. If a character is major in one game, but only has a few lines in another game or two, there is no point giving them a quote page either: just give them a Quotes section with {{tem|main}} to the major appearance, as well as some choice quotes from that and all the quotes from the minor appearance. Similarly, if a character appears in many games, but they only have a couple lines in each one, just compile them into a small list that fits in a single Quotes section (like how no separate list pages are needed when there's only one or two glitches or beta elements). Character with quotes list pages should also get Quotes sections linking to the lists with {{tem|Main}}, with a small sample of notable or characteristic (oft-repeated) quotes (in accordance with [[MarioWiki:Empty Section Policy]]).
Each quote page will have a standardized header: "<code><nowiki>This is a list of quotes by [[character]].</nowiki></code>" (this will be added to [[MarioWiki:Lists]]). The first section will be "General", and list quotes that appear in more than one appearance; if they only occur a couple times, the appearances can be listed (put these quotes at the bottom), but otherwise, just leave them. Try to put the most stereotypical quotes at the top (i.e. "Mama Mia" for Mario, "Help me, Mario!" for Peach, etc.), and remember that generic quotes ''are allowed here'' - just not things like screams ("ahhh"), nonsense and other stuff that sheds absolutely no light on the character ("hi", "okay", etc.); when in doubt, or when there's disagreement, take it to the talk page. After that section, go by genre/media type: Platformers first, since they usually have less quotes, and after that comes Sports, then Spinoffs (including all the random things), then the RPGs (since these are likely to be the big, hefty sections), then the "Non-game appearances", and finally, a Misc. section for commercials ("Mario, Mario, Mario ja nai!" - Peach, ''NSLU''), websites, and other things like that.. Specific series may be given headers, and specific games too, if they produce a large amount of quotes (typically, games sections will be reserved for the RPGs; spinoffs and sports will at least get series headers often, I suspect); otherwise, just put what game each quote is from following the quote All sections should follow the "unsorted" quotes; use chronological order for everything at every level as much as possible. For the non-game appearances, sections can be given for the different shows, movies, publications, etc., or just list them "unsorted" like the games/series with few quotes.
 
Each quote page will have a standardized header: "<code><nowiki>This is a list of quotes by [[character]].</nowiki></code>" (this will be added to [[MarioWiki:Subpages Policy]]). The first section will be "General", and list quotes that appear in more than one appearance; if they only occur a couple times, the appearances can be listed (put these quotes at the bottom), but otherwise, just leave them. Try to put the most stereotypical quotes at the top (i.e. "Mama Mia" for Mario, "Help me, Mario!" for Peach, etc.), and remember that generic quotes ''are allowed here'' - just not things like screams ("ahhh"), nonsense and other stuff that sheds absolutely no light on the character ("hi", "okay", etc.); when in doubt, or when there's disagreement, take it to the talk page. After that section, go by genre/media type: Platformers first, since they usually have less quotes, and after that comes Sports, then Spinoffs (including all the random things), then the RPGs (since these are likely to be the big, hefty sections), then the "Non-game appearances", and finally, a Misc. section for commercials ("Mario, Mario, Mario ja nai!" - Peach, ''NSLU''), websites, and other things like that.. Specific series may be given headers, and specific games too, if they produce a large amount of quotes (typically, games sections will be reserved for the RPGs; spinoffs and sports will at least get series headers often, I suspect); otherwise, just put what game each quote is from following the quote All sections should follow the "unsorted" quotes; use chronological order for everything at every level as much as possible. For the non-game appearances, sections can be given for the different shows, movies, publications, etc., or just list them "unsorted" like the games/series with few quotes.


Pretty sure that's everything. But again, the real proposal part's the first paragraph, so if that's all you read, you got the idea.
Pretty sure that's everything. But again, the real proposal part's the first paragraph, so if that's all you read, you got the idea.
Line 18: Line 17:


====Support====
====Support====
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per me. I've had this idea for ''years'' and have been mulling it over in earnest since [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_34#Delete_quote_sections.2Farticles_that_don.27t_have_any_meaningful_quotes|this proposal happened]]...
#{{User|Walkazo}} - Per me. I've had this idea for ''years'' and have been mulling it over in earnest since [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/34#Delete_quote_sections.2Farticles_that_don.27t_have_any_meaningful_quotes|this proposal happened]]...
#{{User|GBAToad}} Per Walkazo.
#{{User|GBAToad}} Per Walkazo.
#{{User|Zero777}} Seems like a pretty solid proposal. I'll support it! It's a good idea to have a separate page for that because putting a large list on the parent article clutters the place up and takes up too much space which can be bad for people with low bandwidth.
#{{User|Zero777}} Seems like a pretty solid proposal. I'll support it! It's a good idea to have a separate page for that because putting a large list on the parent article clutters the place up and takes up too much space which can be bad for people with low bandwidth.
Line 41: Line 40:


===Disallow Usage of "Per All"===
===Disallow Usage of "Per All"===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">ALLOW USAGE OF PER ALL 0-14</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|0-14|allow usage of "per all"}}
 
My proposal is simple. It is the disallow of "Per All" sentence in proposal. Instead The voter will need a few seconds to specify the the users.
My proposal is simple. It is the disallow of "Per All" sentence in proposal. Instead The voter will need a few seconds to specify the the users.


Line 87: Line 85:


===Semi-Protect templates===
===Semi-Protect templates===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DON'T SEMI-PROTECT THE TEMPLATES 2-6</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|2-6|don't semi-protect the templates 2-6}}
 
Recently I have noticed that anons have done stupid things in the templates. Take [[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3ABabies&diff=1527422&oldid=1527420|this, for example]]. We don't want anons putting fake things in the templates. Or [[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3AWii&diff=1529783&oldid=1529781|what about that?]] We don't want them putting DS games in the Wii template either. It may not happen a lot, but it still happens and we don't want it.
Recently I have noticed that anons have done stupid things in the templates. Take [[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3ABabies&diff=1527422&oldid=1527420|this, for example]]. We don't want anons putting fake things in the templates. Or [[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Template%3AWii&diff=1529783&oldid=1529781|what about that?]] We don't want them putting DS games in the Wii template either. It may not happen a lot, but it still happens and we don't want it.


Line 112: Line 109:
----
----


===Make {{fakelink|game-model}} template===
===Make {{fake link|game-model}} template===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DON'T CREATE LICENCE NOR CATEGORY 7-10</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|7-10|don't create license or category}}
 
Since there is really many 3D games.. and there is too much models on this wiki that is classed as a sprite. So I porpose we create a template for them. I'm not so good with copyrights, but here is an almost a copy from {{tem|game-sprite}}
Since there is really many 3D games.. and there is too much models on this wiki that is classed as a sprite. So I porpose we create a template for them. I'm not so good with copyrights, but here is an almost a copy from {{tem|game-sprite}}
{|align=center style="width:80%;background:#fff9f9;border:1px solid #C55;padding:5px;font-size:12px"
{|align=center style="width:80%;background:#fff9f9;border:1px solid #C55;padding:5px;font-size:12px"
|[[File:Copyright.svg|48px|Copyrighted game screenshot]]
|[[File:Copyright.svg|48px|Copyrighted game screenshot]]
|''This is a [[Wikipedia:3D modeling|model]] originally from a '''[[Wikipedia:Copyright|copyrighted]] computer or video game''', and the '''copyright''' for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game. It is believed that the use of a '''limited number''' of '''web-resolution''' models for '''identification and critical commentary on the computer or video game in question''' or '''the copyrighted character(s) depicted on the screenshot in question''' qualifies as '''[[Wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]]''' under [[Wikipedia:United States copyright law|United States copyright law]], as such display '''does not significantly impede the right of the copyright holder to sell the copyrighted material''', is '''not being used to turn a profit in this context''', and presents ideas that '''cannot be exhibited otherwise'''. See [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Copyrights|Copyrights]] and [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Image description page#Fair use rationale|fair use rationale]].
|''This is a [[wikipedia:3D modeling|model]] originally from a '''[[wikipedia:Copyright|copyrighted]] computer or video game''', and the '''copyright''' for it is most likely held by the company that developed the game. It is believed that the use of a '''limited number''' of '''web-resolution''' models for '''identification and critical commentary on the computer or video game in question''' or '''the copyrighted character(s) depicted on the screenshot in question''' qualifies as '''[[wikipedia:Fair use|fair use]]''' under [[wikipedia:United States copyright law|United States copyright law]], as such display '''does not significantly impede the right of the copyright holder to sell the copyrighted material''', is '''not being used to turn a profit in this context''', and presents ideas that '''cannot be exhibited otherwise'''. See [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Copyrights|Copyrights]] and [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Image description page#Fair use rationale|fair use rationale]].
|}
|}
'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
Line 155: Line 151:


===A writing guideline for Image Maps===
===A writing guideline for Image Maps===
<span style="color:grey;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">WITHDRAWN BY PROPOSER</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|canceled}}
 
:''See [[User:Megadardery/Sandbox#MarioWiki:Image_Maps|here]] for the draft.''
:''See [[User:Megadardery/Sandbox#MarioWiki:Image_Maps|here]] for the draft.''


This writing guideline is meant to clear everything about Image Maps, when to create them, and basic rules. Everything of what are written in the draft are rules which are already known. A help page will be probably drafted, proposed and created as soon as possible. It will be created under the name [[MarioWiki:Image Maps]]. Use the comments section below for comments and suggestions.
This writing guideline is meant to clear everything about Image Maps, when to create them, and basic rules. Everything of what are written in the draft are rules which are already known. A help page will be probably drafted, proposed and created as soon as possible. It will be created under the name [[MarioWiki:Image maps]]. Use the comments section below for comments and suggestions.


'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}  (lots of help from {{User|Walkazo}} appreciated)<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}  (lots of help from {{User|Walkazo}} appreciated)<br>
'''Deadline''': September 13, 2013 23:59 GMT
'''Proposed Deadline''': September 13, 2013 23:59 GMT<br>
'''Date Withdrawn:''' September 3, 2013, 21:25 GMT


====Support====
====Support====
Line 179: Line 175:


===No APNG Files===
===No APNG Files===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">REPLACE APNG FILES 12-1</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|12-1|replace apng files}}
 
My proposal is simple, getting rid of APNG files (animated PNG files) and replace them with GIF files.
My proposal is simple, getting rid of APNG files (animated PNG files) and replace them with GIF files.


Line 228: Line 223:


===The Template Shuffle===
===The Template Shuffle===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">REVISE THE COLOURS AND GROUPINGS 10-0</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|10-0|revise the colours and groupings}}
 
[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/30#Navigation_Templates|Last year]] I drafted the colour-coding system for the templates, and now that we've had time to see it in action, I have some revisions, which can be seen [[User:Walkazo/Essays#Colour_shuffle|in this chart here]]. Red shows which templates are changing, and I have a list of all the specific changes and the reasons why below the chart, but I'll try to summarize it here:
[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_30#Navigation_Templates|Last year]] I drafted the colour-coding system for the templates, and now that we've had time to see it in action, I have some revisions, which can be seen [[User:Walkazo/Essays#Colour_shuffle|in this chart here]]. Red shows which templates are changing, and I have a list of all the specific changes and the reasons why below the chart, but I'll try to summarize it here:


#'''Make spinoffs yellow, sports light green, and Wario purple.''' Right now, the major character pages have massive blocks of purple and aqua with a few reds, blues and teals, making it look more like a bowl of Skittles than a ''Mario''-themed navigation nexus. I blame myself for somehow forgetting that spinoffs are so numerous, but making them yellow (and the sports green) will make the template blocks a lot more ''Mario''ish in colour, plus it'll brighten them up. And purple still works for Wario, so no problem on that end of the swap.
#'''Make spinoffs yellow, sports light green, and Wario purple.''' Right now, the major character pages have massive blocks of purple and aqua with a few reds, blues and teals, making it look more like a bowl of Skittles than a ''Mario''-themed navigation nexus. I blame myself for somehow forgetting that spinoffs are so numerous, but making them yellow (and the sports green) will make the template blocks a lot more ''Mario''ish in colour, plus it'll brighten them up. And purple still works for Wario, so no problem on that end of the swap.
Line 262: Line 256:
:Then try making one up yourself (save the template and everything)and ask me or another admin to approve it and add it to the chart. Just like with footer colours (which is explained in the last paragraph of [[MarioWiki:Navigation_Templates#Colouration|this section of MW:NAV]]). Worst-case scenario is that we might use a slightly different colour instead, but either way, the subheader will get made. - {{User|Walkazo}}
:Then try making one up yourself (save the template and everything)and ask me or another admin to approve it and add it to the chart. Just like with footer colours (which is explained in the last paragraph of [[MarioWiki:Navigation_Templates#Colouration|this section of MW:NAV]]). Worst-case scenario is that we might use a slightly different colour instead, but either way, the subheader will get made. - {{User|Walkazo}}


While going trough some templates, I found {{tem|Morphs}}, I think it should be merged with game templates, but what about {{tem|Galaxy}} & {{tem|Galaxy2}}? {{User|Megadardery}}
While going trough some templates, I found {{tem|Yoshi forms}}, I think it should be merged with game templates, but what about {{tem|SMG missions}} & {{tem|SMG2 missions}}? {{User|Megadardery}}
:That question's rather tangential to the goals of this proposal... But yeah, Morphs should be merged with the YI/YIDS templates. But as I keep saying on the forums, the Galaxy templates are fine the way they are, with their unique names and designs and whatnot, and I still think we should leave them be. - {{User|Walkazo}}
:That question's rather tangential to the goals of this proposal... But yeah, Yoshi forms should be merged with the YI/YIDS templates. But as I keep saying on the forums, the Galaxy templates are fine the way they are, with their unique names and designs and whatnot, and I still think we should leave them be. - {{User|Walkazo}}


::As you may see, Ultra Koopa changed the color to Mario series' color. Is this design what you meant with 'unique designs'? {{User|Megadardery}}
::As you may see, Ultra Koopa changed the color to Mario series' color. Is this design what you meant with 'unique designs'? {{User|Megadardery}}
Line 271: Line 265:


===Links to YouTube Videos in Articles===
===Links to YouTube Videos in Articles===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DON'T HAVE LINKS TO YOUTUBE VIDEOS 1-14</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|1-14|don't have links to youtube videos}}
 
I propose that we include links to YouTube videos within certain Super Mario Wiki articles, such as:
I propose that we include links to YouTube videos within certain Super Mario Wiki articles, such as:


Line 312: Line 305:


===Having a spelling standard===
===Having a spelling standard===
<span style="color:grey;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DELETED BY PROPOSER</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|canceled}}
 
Currently, this wiki allows both American and British spellings, and whilst this is alright it lacks consistency. As seen [http://i.imgur.com/Ok0i4Au.png here], the majority of the site's visitors are American or from American speaking countries. The spelling should reflect that, just like [[MarioWiki:Naming]] does. American spelling is also predominantly used here so therefore it'd be easier to use American spelling over British spelling as there will be less of it to replace. Should this proposal pass, 'Changing British spellings and grammar conventions to American standards, and vice-versa (like changing "colour" to "color")' would need to be taken off the Warning Policy.
Currently, this wiki allows both American and British spellings, and whilst this is alright it lacks consistency. As seen [http://i.imgur.com/Ok0i4Au.png here], the majority of the site's visitors are American or from American speaking countries. The spelling should reflect that, just like [[MarioWiki:Naming]] does. American spelling is also predominantly used here so therefore it'd be easier to use American spelling over British spelling as there will be less of it to replace. Should this proposal pass, 'Changing British spellings and grammar conventions to American standards, and vice-versa (like changing "colour" to "color")' would need to be taken off the Warning Policy.


Line 319: Line 311:


'''Proposer''': {{User|Yoshi876}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Yoshi876}}<br>
'''Deadline''': September 29, 2013, 23:59 GMT
'''Proposed Deadline''': September 29, 2013, 23:59 GMT<br>
'''Date Withdrawn:''' September 22, 2013, 18:50 GMT


====Use only American spellings====
====Use only American spellings====
Line 344: Line 337:


===Stop Considering [[Amp]]s as [[Chain Chomp]]s===
===Stop Considering [[Amp]]s as [[Chain Chomp]]s===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">AMPS ARE NOT CHAIN CHOMPS 12-0</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|12-0|amps are not chain chomps}}
 
I have done a fair amount of research on this, [http://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=27166.0 I've discussed this] with a handful of users, and I've come to the conclusion that there's really no reason for Amps to be considered Chain Chomps. I believe everything started when it was stated that [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=prev&oldid=388174 Amps were mistakenly placed in the "Chain Chomp" category of enemies] in the strategy guide of ''[[New Super Mario Bros.]]''. After that, a user named RedStar wrote that [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=next&oldid=669779 Amps were called Electro-Chomps in the New Super Mario Bros.] ''[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=next&oldid=669779 Wii]'' [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=next&oldid=669779 guide]. As far as I can tell, this has been the entire basis for considered Amps as Chain Chomps, since, after this name was added, everyone accepted that Amps are Chain Chomps as if it was fact. If you noticed, though, there was no source for it, and he eliminated the mention of Amp being wrongly placed in the NSMB guide. What's even more interesting, though, is that Redstar [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Amp&diff=prev&oldid=914693 fully admitted] to that being nothing more than a joke, meaning that "Electro-Chomp" is 100% false.
I have done a fair amount of research on this, [http://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=27166.0 I've discussed this] with a handful of users, and I've come to the conclusion that there's really no reason for Amps to be considered Chain Chomps. I believe everything started when it was stated that [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=prev&oldid=388174 Amps were mistakenly placed in the "Chain Chomp" category of enemies] in the strategy guide of ''[[New Super Mario Bros.]]''. After that, a user named RedStar wrote that [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=next&oldid=669779 Amps were called Electro-Chomps in the New Super Mario Bros.] ''[http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=next&oldid=669779 Wii]'' [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Amp&diff=next&oldid=669779 guide]. As far as I can tell, this has been the entire basis for considered Amps as Chain Chomps, since, after this name was added, everyone accepted that Amps are Chain Chomps as if it was fact. If you noticed, though, there was no source for it, and he eliminated the mention of Amp being wrongly placed in the NSMB guide. What's even more interesting, though, is that Redstar [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Amp&diff=prev&oldid=914693 fully admitted] to that being nothing more than a joke, meaning that "Electro-Chomp" is 100% false.


Line 376: Line 368:
----
----


===Make a template encouraging non-users that have made 20 or more edits to make an account===  
===Make a template encouraging non-users that have made 20 or more edits to make an account===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DO NOT CREATE THE TEMPLATE 4-15</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|4-15|do not create template}}
 
[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/31#Make_a_bot_template_to_non-users_that_have_made_20_or_more_edits_to_encourage_them_to_make_an_account|The Idea]] was very good. It was thrown away and forgotten just because [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3APorplemontage&diff=1385890&oldid=1385884 the automatic process won't work]. But we can issue the template manually. Thankfully, [[User:NewSMBU]] created a draft, with minor changes, I created [[User:Megadardery/Sandbox|another draft]]. While this proposal is going, changes can be done to the draft.
[[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_31#Make_a_bot_template_to_non-users_that_have_made_20_or_more_edits_to_encourage_them_to_make_an_account|The Idea]] was very good. It was thrown away and forgotten just because [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3APorplemontage&diff=1385890&oldid=1385884 the automatic process won't work]. But we can issue the template manually. Thankfully, [[User:NewSMBU]] created a draft, with minor changes, I created [[User:Megadardery/Sandbox|another draft]]. While this proposal is going, changes can be done to the draft.


'''Proposer:''' {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' September 25, 2013 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline:''' September 25, 2013 23:59 GMT
====Support====
====Support====
#{{User|Megadardery}} Per [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_31#Make_a_bot_template_to_non-users_that_have_made_20_or_more_edits_to_encourage_them_to_make_an_account|old proposal]]
#{{User|Megadardery}} Per [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/31#Make_a_bot_template_to_non-users_that_have_made_20_or_more_edits_to_encourage_them_to_make_an_account|old proposal]]
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Will help get more contributive members, per proposal.
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Will help get more contributive members, per proposal.
#{{User|Driftmaster130}} Great idea, per all.
#{{User|Driftmaster130}} Great idea, per all.
Line 407: Line 398:


====Comments====
====Comments====
----
----


===Correct use of the term "Beta"===
===Correct use of the term "Beta"===
<span style="color:gray;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">VETOED BY THE ADMINISTRATORS</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|vetoed|"Beta" was never meant to be taken literally as the specific beta version, but as a convenient umbrella term synonymous with "pre-release". It works perfectly well as-is; there is no need to change the name.}}
<br><small>"Beta" was never meant to be taken literally as the specific beta version, but as a convenient umbrella term synonymous with "pre-release". It works perfectly well as-is; there is no need to change the name.</small>
 
One thing has been irking me a lot and that is the use of "Beta Elements" as the name of the page that has info about stuff not seen in the game.
One thing has been irking me a lot and that is the use of "Beta Elements" as the name of the page that has info about stuff not seen in the game.
The term "beta" is used as (usually) the last release in the software release life cycle and that is where things start to get difficult.
The term "beta" is used as (usually) the last release in the software release life cycle and that is where things start to get difficult.
Line 423: Line 411:


'''Proposer''': {{User|PPLToast}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|PPLToast}}<br>
'''Deadline''': September 29, 2013, 23:59 GMT.
'''Deadline''': September 29, 2013, 23:59 GMT.<br>
'''Date Vetoed:''' October 11, 2013, 17:05 GMT


====Support====
====Support====
Line 467: Line 456:


===A writing guideline for Image Maps===
===A writing guideline for Image Maps===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">CREATE THE POLICY PAGE 9-3</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|9-3|create the policy page}}
 
:see [[User:Megadardery/Writing_Guidelines#MarioWiki:Image Maps|here]] for the draft.
:see [[User:Megadardery/Writing_Guidelines#MarioWiki:Image Maps|here]] for the draft.


This Writing Guideline is meant to clear thing of when and how an Image Map page should be created. It will be created under the name [[MarioWiki:Image Maps]]. These rules only apply to real articles.  
This Writing Guideline is meant to clear thing of when and how an Image Map page should be created. It will be created under the name [[MarioWiki:Image maps]]. These rules only apply to real articles.  


<big>All information are present in the draft, description is present here:</big>  
<big>All information are present in the draft, description is present here:</big>  
Line 485: Line 473:


The Image Map's any dimension must not exceed '''400 pixels''', and the other one must not exceed '''200 pixels'''.
The Image Map's any dimension must not exceed '''400 pixels''', and the other one must not exceed '''200 pixels'''.
The Image Map's width in the {{tem|Worldbox}} template must never exceed '''300 pixels'''.<br>
The Image Map's width in the {{tem|world infobox}} template must never exceed '''300 pixels'''.<br>
I specified the sizes depending on medium sized screens, so it does not look very small, or very big. Reason includes that if maps were larger than that then the page would look very crowded.
I specified the sizes depending on medium sized screens, so it does not look very small, or very big. Reason includes that if maps were larger than that then the page would look very crowded.


Line 491: Line 479:
Otherwise a variable must be declared; so if it is set to <code>infobox</code>,it would be aligned in the center and it would be classed as <code>none</code>. And if it is not set, it would be classed as a <code>thumbnail</code> and it would be aligned to the right.
Otherwise a variable must be declared; so if it is set to <code>infobox</code>,it would be aligned in the center and it would be classed as <code>none</code>. And if it is not set, it would be classed as a <code>thumbnail</code> and it would be aligned to the right.


In other word, templates like {{tem|NSMBmap}} are put inside the {{tem|Worldbox}} and never outside, so it is classed as <code>none</code> and it is aligned in the center, so it looks centered and without borders in the template. Templates like {{tem|PMTTYDmap}} are put outsise the Worldbox template and never inside, so it is classed as <code>thumbnail</code> and aligned to the right. However templates like {{tem|NSMBUmap}} are put both inside and outside, so there is a variable defining if it would be put in the Worldbox template, or would be put outside.
In other word, templates like {{tem|NSMBmap}} are put inside the {{tem|world infobox}} and never outside, so it is classed as <code>none</code> and it is aligned in the center, so it looks centered and without borders in the template. Templates like {{tem|PMTTYD map}} are put outsise the Worldbox template and never inside, so it is classed as <code>thumbnail</code> and aligned to the right. However templates like {{tem|NSMBU map}} are put both inside and outside, so there is a variable defining if it would be put in the Worldbox template, or would be put outside.


The template must only be put where it links to (i.e If the template only links to {{fakelink|page1}} and {{fakelink|page2}}, it must never be put on {{fakelink|page3}}). That's because it is unneeded on an unrelated page.
The template must only be put where it links to (i.e If the template only links to {{fake link|page1}} and {{fake link|page2}}, it must never be put on {{fake link|page3}}). That's because it is unneeded on an unrelated page.


If the article is about a subject that only appeared in the Image Map's game, the template should be put under the info-box. Otherwise the template should be put as the first line in the game's section on the article.
If the article is about a subject that only appeared in the Image Map's game, the template should be put under the info-box. Otherwise the template should be put as the first line in the game's section on the article.


Explaining: {{tem|PMTTYDmap}} links to [[X-Naut Fortress]] and [[The Moon]].. Since X-Naut Fortress only appeared in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door, the template is put under the infobox, However The Moon appeared in multiple games, so the template is put in the game's section.
Explaining: {{tem|PMTTYD map}} links to [[X-Naut Fortress]] and [[The Moon]].. Since X-Naut Fortress only appeared in Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door, the template is put under the infobox, However The Moon appeared in multiple games, so the template is put in the game's section.


For the Platformer games: in the Worlds pages, the template should be put in the <code>map</code> parameter of the {{tem|Worldbox}} template (using the code <code><nowiki>|map={{templatename}}</nowiki></code>). Reason includes it unneeded to crowd the page with a template, which can be put inside the infobox template.
For the Platformer games: in the Worlds pages, the template should be put in the <code>map</code> parameter of the {{tem|world infobox}} template (using the code <code><nowiki>|map={{templatename}}</nowiki></code>). Reason includes it unneeded to crowd the page with a template, which can be put inside the infobox template.


Last three sections describe basics of creating the template.
Last three sections describe basics of creating the template.
Line 534: Line 522:


===Pokemon, Assist Trophies, and the SSB Templates===
===Pokemon, Assist Trophies, and the SSB Templates===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DO NOTHING 3-0-9</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|3-0-9|do nothing}}
 
As of now, we have three templates for the three games in the ''[[Super Smash Bros.]]'' series: {{[[Template:SSB|SSB]]}}}, {{[[Template:SSBM|SSBM]]}}, and {{[[Template:SSBB|SSBB]]}}. All of these templates have various sections for their aspects, whether they'd be items, non-playable characters, enemies, etc. However, there's always been one peculiarity that's always bothered me: none of the Poké Ball Pokémon, nor any of the Assist Trophy characters, are listed in any of templates. We've made it a point of (trying to) list all of the stage hazard characters in the templates, but everything from Andross to Weavile has simply been absent, which seems rather inconsistent. Is there really any reason for keeping them out of the templates? Yes, just about all of the Pokémon/Assist Trophies are merged into articles, but that's why we have redirects (which is also aided by the advent of anchors), and most, if not all, of the stage hazards have also been merged. Really, the only question should be whether to give them separate sections in the template or to stick them in the NPC section.
As of now, we have three templates for the three games in the ''[[Super Smash Bros.]]'' series: {{[[Template:SSB|SSB]]}}}, {{[[Template:SSBM|SSBM]]}}, and {{[[Template:SSBB|SSBB]]}}. All of these templates have various sections for their aspects, whether they'd be items, non-playable characters, enemies, etc. However, there's always been one peculiarity that's always bothered me: none of the Poké Ball Pokémon, nor any of the Assist Trophy characters, are listed in any of templates. We've made it a point of (trying to) list all of the stage hazard characters in the templates, but everything from Andross to Weavile has simply been absent, which seems rather inconsistent. Is there really any reason for keeping them out of the templates? Yes, just about all of the Pokémon/Assist Trophies are merged into articles, but that's why we have redirects (which is also aided by the advent of anchors), and most, if not all, of the stage hazards have also been merged. Really, the only question should be whether to give them separate sections in the template or to stick them in the NPC section.


Line 568: Line 555:


===Make Most Maintenance Categories Hidden===
===Make Most Maintenance Categories Hidden===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DON'T HIDE CATEGORIES 2-6</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|2-6|don't hide categories}}
 
An idea which was willing on my mind from long time ago. The Maintenance categories should be hidden from the categories bar on the bottom of each article. The categories bar on each article is only for main categories. Some readers may just want to navigate through the categories ''without'' contributing. And for any user that does want to see them, he could just navigate to [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering|his Preferences]], in Appearance tab, down at Advanced options. Check "Show hidden categories".
An idea which was willing on my mind from long time ago. The Maintenance categories should be hidden from the categories bar on the bottom of each article. The categories bar on each article is only for main categories. Some readers may just want to navigate through the categories ''without'' contributing. And for any user that does want to see them, he could just navigate to [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-rendering|his Preferences]], in Appearance tab, down at Advanced options. Check "Show hidden categories".


Line 576: Line 562:
*[[:Category:Articles under construction]]
*[[:Category:Articles under construction]]
*[[:Category:Articles with conjectural titles]]
*[[:Category:Articles with conjectural titles]]
*[[:Category:Articles with long Trivia sections]]
*[[:Category:Articles with long trivia sections]]
*[[:Category:Pages with broken file links]] & [[:Category:Articles with broken file links]]
*[[:Category:Pages with broken file links]] & [[:Category:Articles with broken file links]]
*[[:Category:Citation needed]]
*[[:Category:Articles with unsourced statements]]
*[[:Category:Disambiguation]] -- It looks neater for Disamb pages to appear without categories
*[[:Category:Disambiguation]] -- It looks neater for Disamb pages to appear without categories
*[[:Category:Image requested]]
*[[:Category:Articles that need an image]]
*[[:Category:Quality requested]]
*[[:Category:Images to be reuploaded with higher quality]]
*[[:Category:Merge Requested]] & [[:Category:Split Requested]]
*[[:Category:Pages pending merge]] & [[:Category:Pages pending split]]
*[[:Category:Pages with media files]]
*[[:Category:Pages with media files]]
*[[:Category:Protection Change Requested]]
*[[:Category:Protection Change Requested]]
*[[:Category:Requested for Deletion]]* & [[:Category:To be deleted]]* & [[:Category:Talk to be deleted]]*
*[[:Category:Pages pending deletion]]* & [[:Category:Pages to be deleted]]* & [[:Category:Talk to be deleted]]*
*[[:Category:Rewrite Requested]] & [[:Category:Rewrite and Expansion Requested]]
*[[:Category:Articles to be rewritten]] & [[:Category:Articles to be rewritten and expanded]]
*[[:Category:Stubs]] & [[:Category:Section Stubs]] & [[:Category:New Stubs]]
*[[:Category:Stubs]] & [[:Category:Articles with stub sections]] & [[:Category:New Stubs]]


'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
Line 615: Line 601:
Like I said, there are also anons that are willing to contribute the wiki. Keep the hidden categories visible for them. {{User|Iggy Koopa Jr}}
Like I said, there are also anons that are willing to contribute the wiki. Keep the hidden categories visible for them. {{User|Iggy Koopa Jr}}


:Most-to-All Maintenance categories can be seen in [[MarioWiki:Maintenance]], I purpose hiding them so the categories bar doesn't get crowded with them.. Taking [[Trick]] as an example, and you will see that there is 2 categories which aren't helpful in navigation ''at all''. Look at [[List of Mario references on the Web]] and you would see that 3/5 categories are not related to the article just Maintenance. Imagine if this article was requested to be protected (which what I would just about to do, before Walkazo done it) and has media files (which what I will do soon), and it need a reference or two. That would mean that 6/8 of categories which will be hidden from normal view. {{User|Megadardery}}
:Most-to-All Maintenance categories can be seen in [[MarioWiki:Maintenance]], I purpose hiding them so the categories bar doesn't get crowded with them.. Taking [[Trick]] as an example, and you will see that there is 2 categories which aren't helpful in navigation ''at all''. Look at [[List of references on the Internet]] and you would see that 3/5 categories are not related to the article just Maintenance. Imagine if this article was requested to be protected (which what I would just about to do, before Walkazo done it) and has media files (which what I will do soon), and it need a reference or two. That would mean that 6/8 of categories which will be hidden from normal view. {{User|Megadardery}}
::So? Anyone can ignore them. You don't need to hide them, especially when that means anons cannot navigate with the bar, as they don't have a preference page. {{User|Iggy Koopa Jr}}
::So? Anyone can ignore them. You don't need to hide them, especially when that means anons cannot navigate with the bar, as they don't have a preference page. {{User|Iggy Koopa Jr}}


:::ِAgain, all Maintenance categories are found in [[MarioWiki:Maintenance]] and [[:Category:MarioWiki Maintenance]] {{User|Megadardery}}
:::ِAgain, all Maintenance categories are found in [[MarioWiki:Maintenance]] and [[:Category:Maintenance]] {{User|Megadardery}}


----
----


===Re-create script pages===
===Re-create script pages===
<span style="color:gray;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">VETOED BY THE ADMINISTRATORS</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|vetoed|The admins decided as a group that as an encyclopedia, it is not our place to copy full scripts. Summarizing and sampling content is okay, but this is going far beyond the scope of the wiki, and there are also concerns that providing an alternative to playing the games to get at the scripts is drifting towards iffy legal territories.}}
<br><small>The admins decided as a group that as an encyclopedia, it is not our place to copy full scripts. Summarizing and sampling content is okay, but this is going far beyond the scope of the wiki, and there are also concerns that providing an alternative to playing the games to get at the scripts is drifting towards iffy legal territories.</small>
 
On October 7, the script pages for ''[[Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon]]'' and ''[[Mario & Luigi: Dream Team]]'' were deleted, along with [[:Template:Scripts]] without a proposal. I thing that this wiki should have these pages because it provides a lot of information on the game it has a script for. My proposal is to have an administrator bring these pages, including the template, back and to have the ability to create script pages in the future.
On October 7, the script pages for ''[[Luigi's Mansion: Dark Moon]]'' and ''[[Mario & Luigi: Dream Team]]'' were deleted, along with [[:Template:Scripts]] without a proposal. I thing that this wiki should have these pages because it provides a lot of information on the game it has a script for. My proposal is to have an administrator bring these pages, including the template, back and to have the ability to create script pages in the future.


'''Proposer''': {{User|Mario7}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Mario7}}<br>
'''Deadline''': October 14, 2013 23:59 GMT
'''Proposed Deadline''': October 14, 2013 23:59 GMT<br>
'''Date Withdrawn:''' October 8, 2013, 18:19 GMT


====Support====
====Support====
Line 643: Line 628:


====Comments====
====Comments====
----


===Allow Users to issue warnings to IP addresses===
===Allow Users to issue warnings to IP addresses===
<span style="color:red;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DON'T ALLOW 1-9</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|failed|1-9|don't allow}}
 
User can issue warnings to other users, so why can't Users issue warnings to IP addresses? Just commenting on the IP's Talk Page to tell it to stop breaking the rules without a template is silly, adding templates and then the comment is a lot easier just like we issue warnings to users that break the rules.
User can issue warnings to other users, so why can't Users issue warnings to IP addresses? Just commenting on the IP's Talk Page to tell it to stop breaking the rules without a template is silly, adding templates and then the comment is a lot easier just like we issue warnings to users that break the rules.


Line 667: Line 652:


====Comments====
====Comments====
----


----
===Create Did You Know and News Archives sections===
===Create Did You Know and News Archives sections===
<span style="color:grey;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">DELETED BY PROPOSER</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|canceled}}
 
An Idea which was on my mind especially for news, and it has grown up after reading [[Template_talk:DidYouKnow#SUGGESTION:_A_page_of_previous_DidYouKnow_entries|RAP's suggestion]]. There is a lot of interesting trivia that are lost, and forgotten.. Same for news, a list of all things related to the Marioverse, so it can be easily followed, and seen instead of looking through the history of the template, which is really not accurate. The Idea will be implemented by creating a section in each template, that will hopefully contain all the past DidYouKnow/News entries.
An Idea which was on my mind especially for news, and it has grown up after reading [[Template_talk:DidYouKnow#SUGGESTION:_A_page_of_previous_DidYouKnow_entries|RAP's suggestion]]. There is a lot of interesting trivia that are lost, and forgotten.. Same for news, a list of all things related to the Marioverse, so it can be easily followed, and seen instead of looking through the history of the template, which is really not accurate. The Idea will be implemented by creating a section in each template, that will hopefully contain all the past DidYouKnow/News entries.


'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
'''Proposer''': {{User|Megadardery}}<br>
'''Deadline''': October, 21 2013 23:59 GMT
'''Proposed Deadline''': October, 21 2013 23:59 GMT<br>
'''Date Withdrawn:''' October 14, 2013, 22:27 GMT


====Support====
====Support====
Line 685: Line 670:
'''@Walkazo''' While I may agree with you on the DYK part, the news part is lot different. Each new event is placed somewhere separated from the rest. Searching for any event on a specific date may require hours of searching on the whole wiki, putting a list of all news (do not require much details just summaries) makes it lot easier to look upon. Can't understand your ''"plus it's making managing the sections more of a chore for folks"'' part sorry. {{User|Megadardery}}
'''@Walkazo''' While I may agree with you on the DYK part, the news part is lot different. Each new event is placed somewhere separated from the rest. Searching for any event on a specific date may require hours of searching on the whole wiki, putting a list of all news (do not require much details just summaries) makes it lot easier to look upon. Can't understand your ''"plus it's making managing the sections more of a chore for folks"'' part sorry. {{User|Megadardery}}
:Why would it take hours? Just type the date into the search bar with quotation marks and you get all sorts of returns. Lou Albano died on this day in 2009; the Atari 2600 was released in the US on this date in 1977; ''WarioWare: Twisted'' was released on Oct. 14, 2004 in Japan... I found all that in a matter of seconds. Wanna know stuff for September 14? Search that too, or check [[The_'Shroom:Issue_LXXVIII/Mario_Calendar|this out]] - easy peasy. And it'd be more of a chore because it's making whoever wants to edit those sections do more work: instead of just replacing the content, they'd have to copy the old stuff and paste in the archive, and if there's any formatting stuff involved, they'd have to mess around with that too. - {{User|Walkazo}}
:Why would it take hours? Just type the date into the search bar with quotation marks and you get all sorts of returns. Lou Albano died on this day in 2009; the Atari 2600 was released in the US on this date in 1977; ''WarioWare: Twisted'' was released on Oct. 14, 2004 in Japan... I found all that in a matter of seconds. Wanna know stuff for September 14? Search that too, or check [[The_'Shroom:Issue_LXXVIII/Mario_Calendar|this out]] - easy peasy. And it'd be more of a chore because it's making whoever wants to edit those sections do more work: instead of just replacing the content, they'd have to copy the old stuff and paste in the archive, and if there's any formatting stuff involved, they'd have to mess around with that too. - {{User|Walkazo}}
----
----


===Guideline section for "References to other games"/"References in later games"===
===Guideline section for "References to other games"/"References in later games"===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">ACCEPTED 10-0</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|10-0|accepted}}
 
After reading [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/35#Guidelines for what is a reference and what is not|this proposal]], I've been observing the sections "References to other games" and "References in later games" in game articles for quite a while, and I agree people kind of exaggerate it: even when something resembles another thing to them, it does not mean the purpose was to make a reference. The sections are filled with examples, like these from ''[[New Super Mario Bros. U]]'':
After reading [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 35#Guidelines for what is a reference and what is not|this proposal]], I've been observing the sections "References to other games" and "References in later games" in game articles for quite a while, and I agree people kind of exaggerate it: even when something resembles another thing to them, it does not mean the purpose was to make a reference. The sections are filled with examples, like these from ''[[New Super Mario Bros. U]]'':


<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Line 720: Line 705:


====Comments====
====Comments====
----
----


===Trim the Relationship Sections===
===Trim the Relationship Sections===
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">TRIM THE SECTIONS 9-0</span>
{{ProposalOutcome|passed|9-0|trim the sections}}
 
Relationship sections are one of the worst sources of cruft on the wiki. Some are definitely worth writing about, but others are way too minor or straightforward for whole sections - but then where ''could'' you put that info? The solution is simple: ''get rid of the individual character sections altogether''. Just put all the info about a given relationship into a regular old paragraph, and merge similar, minor relationships together to avoid the temptation to pad the info. For many characters, like [[Kamek]] or [[Rosalina]], paragraphs are all you'll need, but for more major characters, general headers like "Family", "Friends", "Foes and rivals", etc. can be used to group related subjects. Then the entire "Relationships" section can be a subsection in the "General Information" sections, bringing even more nested order to the character pages (also please note that these sections should just be called "Relationships" from now on, rather than the wordy headers we have now). You can see a couple worked examples on [[User:Walkazo/Essays|my work page]], such as [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User%3AWalkazo%2FEssays&diff=1564779&oldid=1564741 this change] going from [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:Walkazo/Essays&oldid=1564741 this] to [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:Walkazo/Essays&oldid=1564779 that] - note the compact TOC section, and how, despite not actually removing all that much stuff, the whole thing seems much less sprawling and fragmented, doesn't it? And when you start with pages with filler, [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User%3AWalkazo%2FEssays&diff=1564793&oldid=1564781 the amount that you can trim is even more noticeable] - and still without losing any of the good info, while at the same time making it easier to add info about new simple yet noteworthy relationships. It's win-win-win.
Relationship sections are one of the worst sources of cruft on the wiki. Some are definitely worth writing about, but others are way too minor or straightforward for whole sections - but then where ''could'' you put that info? The solution is simple: ''get rid of the individual character sections altogether''. Just put all the info about a given relationship into a regular old paragraph, and merge similar, minor relationships together to avoid the temptation to pad the info. For many characters, like [[Kamek]] or [[Rosalina]], paragraphs are all you'll need, but for more major characters, general headers like "Family", "Friends", "Foes and rivals", etc. can be used to group related subjects. Then the entire "Relationships" section can be a subsection in the "General Information" sections, bringing even more nested order to the character pages (also please note that these sections should just be called "Relationships" from now on, rather than the wordy headers we have now). You can see a couple worked examples on [[User:Walkazo/Essays|my work page]], such as [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User%3AWalkazo%2FEssays&diff=1564779&oldid=1564741 this change] going from [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:Walkazo/Essays&oldid=1564741 this] to [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User:Walkazo/Essays&oldid=1564779 that] - note the compact TOC section, and how, despite not actually removing all that much stuff, the whole thing seems much less sprawling and fragmented, doesn't it? And when you start with pages with filler, [http://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=User%3AWalkazo%2FEssays&diff=1564793&oldid=1564781 the amount that you can trim is even more noticeable] - and still without losing any of the good info, while at the same time making it easier to add info about new simple yet noteworthy relationships. It's win-win-win.