128,882
edits
User talk:Mr Man: Difference between revisions
m
Reverted edits by 92.40.212.175 (talk) to last revision by OhoJeeOnFire
m (Reverted edits by 92.40.212.175 (talk) to last revision by OhoJeeOnFire) Tag: Rollback |
|||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{Block|reason=sockpuppeting, vandalism, and trolling}} | ||
{{Welcome|name=Mr Man}} | |||
Just to let you know, I created my account on my 3DS. | Just to let you know, I created my account on my 3DS. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
My laptop is at school.[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 13:30, 9 October 2011 (EDT) | My laptop is at school.[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 13:30, 9 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
No actual PC then?. | |||
[[User:Donaldthescotishtwin|Donaldthescotishtwin]] | |||
I'm being accused of vandalising the page for Mario Super Sluggers when my 3DS is to blame? [[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 14:09, 10 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
Yes,it's your mistake because your using the 3Ds browser. [[User:Donaldthescotishtwin|Donaldthescotishtwin]] | |||
==Re: Eh?== | |||
Ah, you mean the edit I reverted. It was reverted because you do not simply go around placing useless information on article in the vain hope that it will get moved to the BJAODN page. That will merely get you seen as a vandal, which will in turn mean you being blocked. The content of BJAODN is rarely new; it is just a collection of "amusing" newbie errors, vandalism and mainly comes from new, unfinished, awful stub pages made in a hurry by new users. Please refrain from that, as it reduces the quality of the wiki if a bunch of users like you started going to articles and deliberately making them worse just to try and get "fame" from having some edit made by you in BJAODN. It is rightly in the list of "Things Not To Do" on Welcome templates. To summarise then, please do not repeat this activity. Just look for a PipeProject you might be able to help with. Other users and the staff may not look so kindly on this. You've had a last warning too, which means you could easily be blocked for your "contribution" to BJAODN. Thank you for your time. {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 09:08, 25 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
Have you forgotten to respond on your talkpage, not mine?[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 11:44, 25 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
:He has the right to respond to you on your talk page or his. {{user:kingbowser99/sig}} | |||
If anyone doesn't find my post funny (the text saying "Mario held captive by the Army Hammer Bro" getting replaced with "Mario being hit by a Hammer Bro after forming rope around his body"), I'm suprised, Frostyfireyoshi... [[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 07:47, 26 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
:The point of BJAODN isn't to purposefully contribute to it; we stick typos and other mistakes that are "so cretinous and devoid of information that it makes you suspect the sanity of the writer". We don't want such information on there purposefully; all the mistakes you see in BJAODN were removed or rewritten so they were no longer BJAODN. It may have been BJAODN worthy, but that's not a good thing on our mainspace articles. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | |||
And I think that when I got that Last Warning, the heading should be something like "Last Warning Ever!", not just "Warning". [[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 05:34, 27 October 2011 (EDT) | |||
==Blocked users== | |||
Please stop editing the parameters for {{tem|block}} on blocked users' talk pages, as it is unnecessary for you to change it like that. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | |||
See...[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 13:52, 1 November 2011 (EDT) | |||
== Re: ? == | |||
I don't really know what you're talking about here, but I would define a bad page as being an article that serves no purpose on the wiki. {{User:Marioguy1/sig}} | |||
Well, I read Pat100's block template and it says "Pat100 has been blocked forever from editing the Super Mario Wiki for creating bad pages.".[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 13:04, 3 November 2011 (EDT) | |||
:Oh, Pat100 was creating articles advertising other websites, which is against the rules. He did it even after being warned, so he was blocked. {{User:Marioguy1/sig}} | |||
So basically, an example of a bad page is a page that advertises another website, and they should be put up for deletion when discovered, then an administrator should delete them.[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 11:16, 6 November 2011 (EST) | |||
== RE: The 096rebmulp & loor k niatpak account == | |||
Thanks for the info, but we were already aware of said case with that account. In fact, since that was a sockpuppet account as well, we blocked it permanently on the same day upon seeing evidence of their editing behavior. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 17:48, 4 November 2011 (EDT) | |||
==Bob Hoskins== | |||
Please do not censor the quote there have been many disscussions about censoring it and the conclusion has always been to leave it uncensored {{User|Raven Effect}} | |||
What? You are aware that swearing is banned on this wiki!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 15:11, 19 November 2011 (EST) | |||
:No it's banned in Userspace and if you don't believe me see this proposal [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive_15#Article_censorship] {{User|Raven Effect}} | |||
== Re: Should I archive? == | |||
I don't usually archive a page until it gets tedious to scroll down to the bottom - usually after 20 or so headers. I think that may be a little bit too soon though, as I've seen people who archive after a lot longer. {{User|Porplemontage}} archives every 100 headers IIRC. It's really a matter of opinion, but I don't really think it's painful to scroll down your talk page yet. {{User:Marioguy1/sig}} | |||
== Reply == | |||
If you're referring to the proposals page, proposals made just to waste everyone's time are joke proposals and do not get archived. The ones you are talking about are not put on the Proposals page. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}} | |||
== RE: Your question about Pdjr9000 == | |||
Hi there; we're really not obligated to post comments after giving someone the ban from this site. The reasons we put for the block should be clear enough when the offending user encounters that their editing abilities have been revoked. Besides, using the block template is enough when one of us on the staff has issued the block. Hope that answers your question. --M. C. - "Mario Gals" Fan! [[User:MeritC|User Page]] | [[User_talk:MeritC|Talk Page]] 13:50, 27 November 2011 (EST) | |||
== Re: Uh no. == | |||
It says on {{tem|Block}} that infinitely blocked users can have their talkpage deleted... {{User:Pokémon Trainer Red/sig}} | |||
No, the [[MarioWiki:Blocking policy|Blocking Policy]] says sockpuppets should have their talkpages deleted, but not other permabanned accounts.[[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 11:09, 3 December 2011 (EST) | |||
:Mr Man, does it say on {{tem|Block}} that "Block templates should '''only''' be used for '''temporarily blocked users'''. Talk pages of permanently banned users are viable for deletion and do not need the template. However, exceptions can be made for talk pages deemed useful for possible future references." If there's a talk page of an indefinitely blocked user that has nothing useful for future reference, then it is deleted. Talk pages of indefinitely blocked spambots, robots, and sockpuppets are ALL deleted if nothing on the talk page is useful for future reference. Your refusal to compromise with me on the page [[User talk:PORN116]] is disgraceful and fruitless. Please mind this behavior in the future. --{{User:B.wilson/sig}} 20:31, 4 December 2011 (EST) | |||
Yeah but only sockpuppets and spambots. Also, don't be such a plagiarist. {{unsigned|Mr Man}} | |||
:Exactly ''how'' is plagiarism even involved/relevant? [[User:Lord Grammaticus|Lord Grammaticus]] 13:13, 12 December 2011 (EST) | |||
Tell MeritC I have a confession to make. [[User:Mr Man|Mr Man]] 14:51, 21 December 2011 (EST) | |||