Talk:Virtual Console: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "‎" to ""
m (Text replacement - "‎" to "")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 206: Line 206:
== [Wii U Game Section] Australia Release Date Problem ==
== [Wii U Game Section] Australia Release Date Problem ==


Can someone try to fix the problem with the Australian release dates for Wii U Virtual Console games? Its dates are not perfectly centered, they're shifted up a little bit. Thanks. {{unsigned|‎Tryloubliss}}
Can someone try to fix the problem with the Australian release dates for Wii U Virtual Console games? Its dates are not perfectly centered, they're shifted up a little bit. Thanks. {{unsigned|Tryloubliss}}


:It's something in {{tem|Virtual Console Info}}, but I can't spot the problem.
:It's something in {{tem|Virtual Console Info}}, but I can't spot the problem.


:{{User:Shokora/sig}} 20:17, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
:{{User:Shokora/sig}} 20:17, 2 November 2016 (EDT)
== Vanish Mario and emulation ==
On the bullet point about how Vanish Mario looks different in the VC version of Super Mario 64, it says:
"Vanish Mario appears purely transparent instead of flickering in dithered colors for unknown reasons.[citation needed]"
First, is the citation needed for the reasons the graphics are different, or for the fact that Vanish Mario looks different in the first place?
Second, the reasons Vanish Mario looks different are known. [http://emulation.gametechwiki.com/index.php/Nintendo_64_emulators#Emulation_issues Emulation of N64 graphics] isn't accurate for various reasons: the two that wiki page mentions are imperfect approximations of how the N64 GPU displayed graphics, and the N64's use of three-point, instead of four-point bilinear filtering. Something about that could be added but it seems a little long for a single blurb in a section about SM64.
In that case it might be worth looking into why Vanish Mario looks different, I assume it's because the VC uses high-level emulation. {{User:Yosh Strider/sig}} 17:48, 16 September 2017 (EDT)
==Potentially false information?==
{{talk}}
In the sentence ''*Note: $10 eShop cards are only available at Wal-Mart, GameStop, Best Buy, and Target in the United States only.'', the article claims that $10 eShop cards are only available in the US, however, I have seen these 10$ cards outside of the US. Does this bit of information have a source? {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 20:21, 6 December 2018 (EST)