23,679
edits
Talk:Ganondorf: Difference between revisions
m
→Shades of a villain: Forum talk
(Character Count) |
m (→Shades of a villain: Forum talk) |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FATALK}} | {{FATALK}} | ||
Ahem, Why the HELL is there a ZELDA villian in a MARIO WIKI?!?!?!? It's Messed! I request this page be removed at once. The Zelda Wiki is the one that should have responsibility for Ganon. [[User:Super Mario 256|Super Mario 256]] 12:08, 22 April 2007 (EDT) | Ahem, Why the HELL is there a ZELDA villian in a MARIO WIKI?!?!?!? It's Messed! I request this page be removed at once. The Zelda Wiki is the one that should have responsibility for Ganon. [[User:Super Mario 256|Super Mario 256]] 12:08, 22 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Currently, it is 8064 (check my sig for the date/time). This means that we probably don't need to worry about it falling below 4000 anytime soon. No, nobody asked, but I checked the count, so I felt I should share it so no one else has to. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 19:52, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | Currently, it is 8064 (check my sig for the date/time). This means that we probably don't need to worry about it falling below 4000 anytime soon. No, nobody asked, but I checked the count, so I felt I should share it so no one else has to. {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 19:52, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
== SSB4 == | |||
Ganondorf has been leaked twice, once by Nintendo themselves. Should we mention something related to this? | |||
{{User|Magikrazy}} | |||
:Potentially the one from Nintendo, but otherwise, we don't cover leaks, regardless of whether or not they're true. {{User:Time Turner/sig}} | |||
::It was discussed on the talk page for SSB4 that we wait for the Japanese release. It's not that far anyway. {{User:Tails777/sig}} | |||
== Featured Article == | |||
Okay, I get that due to Smash, it’s reasonable for the page to be here, and sure, it’s well written, but Ganondorf really shouldn’t be the FA on ''MarioWiki''. I’m not demanding it be changed (although I know you guys change your FA like every week) but I just want to know why on earth '''Ganon''' was chosen as your FA. | |||
Also the fact that you change your FA so much makes us a SmashWiki look bad because we only change it every few months. [[Special:Contributions/72.133.91.93|72.133.91.93]] 11:50, 1 October 2018 (EDT)Blueflame105 | |||
:Ganondorf was featured back in 2008, and its article has continued to withstand the test of time. The reason it's currently highlighted is because it's its turn, you can see the list for upcoming Featured Articles [[:Template:UpcomingFA|here]]. As for changing it every week, we have a lot of featured articles and it takes us over a year to feature them all on the main page. If we only changed it every few months, it'd take several years to feature each article. {{User|Yoshi876}} | |||