31,012
edits
Talk:Banana Coin: Difference between revisions
→Split Banana Coin from Banana Bunch Coin: cancelling per request of the proposer, commenting
m (→Comments) |
(→Split Banana Coin from Banana Bunch Coin: cancelling per request of the proposer, commenting) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Split Banana Coin from Banana Bunch Coin== | ==Split Banana Coin from Banana Bunch Coin== | ||
{{ | {{ProposalOutcome|canceled}} | ||
I do not agree with this proposal, as the only difference between a Banana Bunch Coin and a Banana Coin is that the former has a picture of a banana bunch on it, the other has a single banana. They both share the same purpose within the DK games, giving them to the supporting Kong(s) to pay up for their offered service. | I do not agree with this proposal, as the only difference between a Banana Bunch Coin and a Banana Coin is that the former has a picture of a banana bunch on it, the other has a single banana. They both share the same purpose within the DK games, giving them to the supporting Kong(s) to pay up for their offered service. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Yes, I want that. Should this entire proposal be removed then? I made this proposal because LinkTheLefty put the split template on this page and posted this in the summary for his edit he made back in January: "Might as well, given the apparent recent currency splits." {{User:A51 Trooper/sig}} 17:40, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | Yes, I want that. Should this entire proposal be removed then? I made this proposal because LinkTheLefty put the split template on this page and posted this in the summary for his edit he made back in January: "Might as well, given the apparent recent currency splits." {{User:A51 Trooper/sig}} 17:40, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
:Well if you don't want them split, then yeah you can cancel the proposal. They are currently merged anyway. {{User:Tails777/sig}}18:04, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | :Well if you don't want them split, then yeah you can cancel the proposal. They are currently merged anyway. {{User:Tails777/sig}}18:04, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | ||
I've cancelled this proposal, as requested by A51 Trooper. But as I said on his talk page, an established consensus is a good thing to have, especially when someone had previously raised a concern about the subject being merged. A passed TPP is a good precedent to look back on in case somebody else wants to raise the suggestion of splitting the articles in future. | |||
{{User:YoshiKong/sig}} 20:07, 25 September 2016 (EDT) | |||