Talk:Unithorn's Lair: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Unithorn's Lair (edit)

Revision as of 20:26, May 10, 2014

73 bytes added , 10 years ago

no edit summary

Mario

Administrators

33,044

edits

Revision as of 09:34, October 23, 2006 (edit) Son of Suns (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 20:26, May 10, 2014 (edit) (undo) Mario (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:OK,how can the word "harass" be innapropriate? Whatever, I changed it to "bother" since "irritate" sounds weird. ( It was spelled wrong anyway ;) ) [[User: Monty Mole\|<span style="font-family:BrushScrD; color:#C0D9D9;"><font size="3"><i>Monty Mole]]</i></font></span> (<span style="font-family:Vrinda">[[User talk:Monty Mole\|Talk]]·[[Special: Contributions/Monty Mole\|Contribs]]</span>) 17:16, 21 October 2006 (EDT)		:OK,how can the word "harass" be innapropriate? Whatever, I changed it to "bother" since "irritate" sounds weird. ( It was spelled wrong anyway ;) ) [[User: Monty Mole\|<span style="font-family:BrushScrD; color:#C0D9D9;"><font size="3"><i>Monty Mole]]</i></font></span> (<span style="font-family:Vrinda">[[User talk:Monty Mole\|Talk]]·[[Special: Contributions/Monty Mole\|Contribs]]</span>) 17:16, 21 October 2006 (EDT)

	Even if the word was "molest", we are protected by the first amendment. The government cannot legally shut down this website because of that. Should Wikipedia be shut down for having articles about sex and rape? -- [[User: Son of Suns\|Son of Suns]]		Even if the word was "molest" (which is a perfectly acceptable alternate term for bother), we are protected by the first amendment. The government cannot legally shut down this website because of that. Should Wikipedia be shut down for having articles about sex and rape? I think not. -- [[User: Son of Suns\|Son of Suns]]