Talk:Mario (film character): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
::We had a proposal where it was decided that the movie characters were just to different from the regular versions of the characters to be considered the same. {{User|Marshal Dan Troop}}
::We had a proposal where it was decided that the movie characters were just to different from the regular versions of the characters to be considered the same. {{User|Marshal Dan Troop}}
:::Miyamoto himself claims that the film was purely made for fun. This has nothing to do with the Mario we know. The film just takes ideas from the series and turned it into something a little darker and creepier. {{User:JORDAN DEBONO/sig}} 15:03, 8 November 2012 (EST)
:::Miyamoto himself claims that the film was purely made for fun. This has nothing to do with the Mario we know. The film just takes ideas from the series and turned it into something a little darker and creepier. {{User:JORDAN DEBONO/sig}} 15:03, 8 November 2012 (EST)
::::Okay, I got it. It's better like this anyway :) {{User:Banon/sig}} 16:34, 8 November 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 17:34, November 8, 2012

Non canonical ?

Why is this character considered not as the same as Mario ? I know there are differences, but isn't supposed to be the same character ? Is it because it is considered non-canon ? I don't understand..
Banon (talk · edits) 13:34, 8 November 2012 (EST)

If you feel it should be with Mario you can create a proposal. DKPetey99DKPetey99TCE
We had a proposal where it was decided that the movie characters were just to different from the regular versions of the characters to be considered the same. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)
Miyamoto himself claims that the film was purely made for fun. This has nothing to do with the Mario we know. The film just takes ideas from the series and turned it into something a little darker and creepier. JackpotPersonolisedMiion3DS.JPGJordan 15:03, 8 November 2012 (EST)
Okay, I got it. It's better like this anyway :)
Banon (talk · edits) 16:34, 8 November 2012 (EST)