MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Hoops 3-on-3: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== <div class="boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify;-moz-border-radius:20px; background: #E9AB17...") |
m (→|3}}: Time edit) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify;-moz-border-radius:20px; background: #E9AB17; color:black; margin: .5em 2%; padding: 0 1em; border: 1px dotted orangered"> | <div class="boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify;-moz-border-radius:20px; background: #E9AB17; color:black; margin: .5em 2%; padding: 0 1em; border: 1px dotted orangered"> | ||
The "'''{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}'''" article was nominated for Featured Article status at 14: | The "'''{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}'''" article was nominated for Featured Article status at 14:56 14 October 2012 | ||
</div>[[Category:FA nomination pages|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] | </div>[[Category:FA nomination pages|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]] | ||
Revision as of 11:00, October 14, 2012
Mario Hoops 3-on-3
Support
- Yoshi K (talk) I was looking for articles that deserved to be FAs, so I looked at this article and said, "Wow." This article is very well-written, has no improvement tags, has a good lead, no red-links (the red stuff in the article is coloring), has a lot of info about the game, and has many good-quality images. I double-checked it for mistakes, and I still can't find anything wrong with it! I think this should be featured.
