9,258
edits
MarioWiki:Proposals: Difference between revisions
→Oppose
(→Oppose) |
(→Oppose) |
||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
#{{User|Hewer}} What? It's relevant information that has every reason to be there, it not being that interesting to most is a very bad reason to single it out and remove it at the expense of the wiki's comprehensiveness, and I have no idea what the problem is with galleries having all the relevant images. Removing stuff just because you aren't interested in it feels short-sighted and way too slippery a slope. | #{{User|Hewer}} What? It's relevant information that has every reason to be there, it not being that interesting to most is a very bad reason to single it out and remove it at the expense of the wiki's comprehensiveness, and I have no idea what the problem is with galleries having all the relevant images. Removing stuff just because you aren't interested in it feels short-sighted and way too slippery a slope. | ||
#{{User|Koopa con Carne | #{{User|Koopa con Carne}} They're relevant to their pages. I don't think it's the fan encyclopedia that should take the blame for their excessiveness. | ||
#{{User|JanMisali}} Per all. If there's too many images in the gallery, that's what making a gallery subpage is for. | #{{User|JanMisali}} Per all. If there's too many images in the gallery, that's what making a gallery subpage is for. | ||
#{{User|Super Mario RPG}} I don't see any reason why the images shouldn't stay. | #{{User|Super Mario RPG}} I don't see any reason why the images shouldn't stay. | ||
#{{User|Arend}} A gallery is the best place for preserving images like these. That Nintendo made an excessive amount of course icon variants that each feature a different (compatible) character, is not our fault. | |||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||