Editing User talk:Mariofan9000
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
::Thanks for trying to fix [[:File:Freezing Yoshi Glitch.gif]]. The other one was better. I reverted. Oh well. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 19:38, 5 May 2016 (EDT) | ::Thanks for trying to fix [[:File:Freezing Yoshi Glitch.gif]]. The other one was better. I reverted. Oh well. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 19:38, 5 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::I think I have an idea how to upload a better version of [[:File:Freezing Yoshi Glitch.gif]] where it is 1x native instead of the 2x native it currently is. Can you extract each frame of that GIF to save them as PNG, shrink the extracted frames to 50% using [[Wikipedia:FastStone Image Viewer|FastStone Image Viewer]] with no filter, and then import those frames back? I do this sometimes for those PNGs that are 2x or more native (integer) and get no artifacting like you experienced, even with odd numbered dimensions. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 20:30, 5 May 2016 (EDT) | :::I think I have an idea how to upload a better version of [[:File:Freezing Yoshi Glitch.gif]] where it is 1x native instead of the 2x native it currently is. Can you extract each frame of that GIF to save them as PNG, shrink the extracted frames to 50% using [[Wikipedia:FastStone Image Viewer|FastStone Image Viewer]] with no filter, and then import those frames back? I do this sometimes for those PNGs that are 2x or more native (integer) and get no artifacting like you experienced, even with odd numbered dimensions. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 20:30, 5 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::Alright! Good work! Users like {{user|Baby Luigi}} and {{user|Bazooka Mario}} have been concerned with my usage of {{tem|image-quality}} as I used it on that image before. In general, their concerns were with [[:Category: | ::::Alright! Good work! Users like {{user|Baby Luigi}} and {{user|Bazooka Mario}} have been concerned with my usage of {{tem|image-quality}} as I used it on that image before. In general, their concerns were with [[:Category:Image quality requested]] getting crowded. There is an on-going discussion going on how to handle this situation ([[User talk:Wildgoosespeeder/QualityRequestTypes/sandbox|here]]). Now there shouldn't be any more gripes with the usage now on that particular image. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:11, 6 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
:::::Hate to bother you again but I forgot about three more GIFs. There are a lot more frames to the three that I just added to the list. If you want to save time, FastStone Image Viewer has a batch convert mode were you can apply the resize settings (amongst other settings) to the images with a few simple clicks. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 17:33, 6 May 2016 (EDT) | :::::Hate to bother you again but I forgot about three more GIFs. There are a lot more frames to the three that I just added to the list. If you want to save time, FastStone Image Viewer has a batch convert mode were you can apply the resize settings (amongst other settings) to the images with a few simple clicks. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 17:33, 6 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
::::::Hmm...You sure you set the filter mode to none and reduction to 50% in the batch convert mode? One frame I tested through ''prt scr'' reduces just fine. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:10, 6 May 2016 (EDT) | ::::::Hmm...You sure you set the filter mode to none and reduction to 50% in the batch convert mode? One frame I tested through ''prt scr'' reduces just fine. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 22:10, 6 May 2016 (EDT) | ||
