Editing Talk:Rip Van Fish
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Relation to Cheep Cheeps== | ==Relation to Cheep Cheeps== | ||
{{talk}} | |||
{{multiframe|1=<div style=background:blue>[[File:CheepCheepSMW.png|64px]]</div>|align=right|size=64|2=Truly hideous.}} | {{multiframe|1=<div style=background:blue>[[File:CheepCheepSMW.png|64px]]</div>|align=right|size=64|2=Truly hideous.}} | ||
While [[Porcupuffer]] at least looks like a Cheep Cheep, and [[Blurp]] and [[Piscatory Pete]] have Japanese names indicating their relations, these don't really seem to have anything indicating that they're a Cheep Cheep. Granted, Cheep Cheep in ''Super Mario World'' was the first in a string of awfully off-model Cheeps, and it was a lot more flexible than most depictions, as seen by the flopping sprites, but still, there really isn't anything definitively pointing to them being Cheep Cheeps. Even [[Spray Fish]] seems more viable, it at least has the mohawk going for it. <s>(Also, why can't I make that picture I'm using to show how hideous the SMW Cheep was any bigger?)</s> [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:32, 28 December 2017 (EST) | While [[Porcupuffer]] at least looks like a Cheep Cheep, and [[Blurp]] and [[Piscatory Pete]] have Japanese names indicating their relations, these don't really seem to have anything indicating that they're a Cheep Cheep. Granted, Cheep Cheep in ''Super Mario World'' was the first in a string of awfully off-model Cheeps, and it was a lot more flexible than most depictions, as seen by the flopping sprites, but still, there really isn't anything definitively pointing to them being Cheep Cheeps. Even [[Spray Fish]] seems more viable, it at least has the mohawk going for it. <s>(Also, why can't I make that picture I'm using to show how hideous the SMW Cheep was any bigger?)</s> [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:32, 28 December 2017 (EST) | ||
Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
::::::::::::::::Porcupuffer is at least ''shaped'' like a Cheep Cheep, ''and'' was used as a large counterpart in 3D Land/World. So I'd say there's a direct connection on that one. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:02, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | ::::::::::::::::Porcupuffer is at least ''shaped'' like a Cheep Cheep, ''and'' was used as a large counterpart in 3D Land/World. So I'd say there's a direct connection on that one. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 15:02, April 22, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:::::::::::::::::I'd agree to demote Porcupuffer as a derivative of Cheep Cheep, even though it slightly resembles a Cheep Cheep. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 08:23, April 26, 2019 (EDT) | :::::::::::::::::I'd agree to demote Porcupuffer as a derivative of Cheep Cheep, even though it slightly resembles a Cheep Cheep. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 08:23, April 26, 2019 (EDT) | ||
Given the major agreement, should we demote it as a derivative? --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 05:37, May 5, 2019 (EDT) | Given the major agreement, should we demote it as a derivative? --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 05:37, May 5, 2019 (EDT) | ||
:Which? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:41, May 5, 2019 (EDT) | :Which? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:41, May 5, 2019 (EDT) | ||
::The Rip Van Fish. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 08:48, May 6, 2019 (EDT) | ::The Rip Van Fish. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 08:48, May 6, 2019 (EDT) | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |