381,838
edits
MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/42: Difference between revisions
m
Text replacement - "{{tem|item-infobox}}" to "{{tem|item infobox}}"
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{tem|item-infobox}}" to "{{tem|item infobox}}") |
||
| Line 321: | Line 321: | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
[[Template:Company infobox|We already have one.]]--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 17:18, 16 April 2015 (EDT) | [[Template:Company infobox|We already have one.]]--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 17:18, 16 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
:That's for RL companies, so it wouldn't be an even worse fit. Although in all honesty, as long as people aren't stupid and only use the "first/latest appearances" and "notable members" headers and not the ones that make no sense, {{tem|species-infobox}} works fine. But I also suppose a different template wouldn't hurt, seeing as we also have {{tem|character infobox}}, {{tem|item | :That's for RL companies, so it wouldn't be an even worse fit. Although in all honesty, as long as people aren't stupid and only use the "first/latest appearances" and "notable members" headers and not the ones that make no sense, {{tem|species-infobox}} works fine. But I also suppose a different template wouldn't hurt, seeing as we also have {{tem|character infobox}}, {{tem|item infobox}}, {{tem|location-infobox}} and even {{tem|form infobox}}, [[:Category:Infobox templates|among others]]. But what exactly do you (Binarystep) want as the new template? It's not good enough to just ask us to approve something without even a vague clue about what you have in mind. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 17:23, 16 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
::Oh. Yeah, that makes more sense than what I was thinking. The species infobox still work alright though.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 17:24, 16 April 2015 (EDT) | ::Oh. Yeah, that makes more sense than what I was thinking. The species infobox still work alright though.--[[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 17:24, 16 April 2015 (EDT) | ||
::Maybe we should use the same template as the one which is used by the [[Koopalings]] for the [[Tiki Tak Tribe]], but for the snowmad, I'm not sure...--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}} 17:27, 16 April 2015 (EDT) | ::Maybe we should use the same template as the one which is used by the [[Koopalings]] for the [[Tiki Tak Tribe]], but for the snowmad, I'm not sure...--{{User:LudwigVon/sig}} 17:27, 16 April 2015 (EDT) | ||