Editing MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Paper Mario
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMSTAT | ||
|nominated=12:26, 1 January 2017 (EST) | |nominated=12:26, 1 January 2017 (EST) | ||
| | |passed= | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|MarioMario456}} 155KB and no red links. | #{{User|MarioMario456}} 155KB and no red links. | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} If lack of red links is your only reason, I'm gonna say no. The page currently has a rewrite template and a construction template at the top, which goes against the [[MarioWiki:Featured_articles|rules for nomination]]. See also: [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Paper Mario]] | |||
#{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} I agree. Having a rewrite or construction template on the page is against the nomination rules. Also, I spotted a red link. Per Alex95. | |||
#{{User|Luigi 64DD}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} The article is still undergoing work to fix the issues it had when it became unfeatured. It's in no state to be re-featured at this current time. | |||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Article size has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the article. If that were the case, [[Yoshi]] would be candidate for a featured article but as it is currently, it is a cesspool of bad and flowery, biased writing. The article still has a construction tag and a rewrite template on the top of the page, and it irks me that you didn't give a crap about the rules, which explicitly forbid nominating articles with those tags up (which have their own stories to tell that I won't go over, but are there for a reason). '''Read the guidelines first''' before you make nominations that fail on the very first and clear rule. | |||
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} Per all. Length does not always guarantee good writing. | |||
#{{User|Bazooka Mario}} In the future, you need to review [[MarioWiki:Featured_articles#Featured_article_standards|our rules]] before you nominate articles like this. There is an impressive amount of work poured in, but it remains that this article is incomplete. Please be more careful in the future. | |||
#{{User|Boo4761}} First of all, there is a rewrite template on the top, second, Article size has nothing to do with its quality. Lastly, this article is largely incomplete and we are still working on the issues that got it unfeatured. You have clearly never read the guidelines for nominating articles, can you please read it in the future? | |||
==== Removal of opposes ==== | ==== Removal of opposes ==== | ||
Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
I believe that, as soon as the storyline summary has been rewritten and a final check has been performed, the page will be up to featured standard. - {{User|Gabumon}} | I believe that, as soon as the storyline summary has been rewritten and a final check has been performed, the page will be up to featured standard. - {{User|Gabumon}} | ||
:The only major thing I've seen that needs to be rewritten is the staff section, where it's just an excerpt of the staff page and we discourage that An example on how it would ideally look like is [https://www.mariowiki.com/Mario_Party:_Star_Rush#Staff this]. And I think this article would benefit from a reception section, as that's starting become the norm. Otherwise, I think it would be fine to take off that rewrite tag. The only issues I see are minor ones. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 20:23, 1 March 2017 (EST) | :The only major thing I've seen that needs to be rewritten is the staff section, where it's just an excerpt of the staff page and we discourage that An example on how it would ideally look like is [https://www.mariowiki.com/Mario_Party:_Star_Rush#Staff this]. And I think this article would benefit from a reception section, as that's starting become the norm. Otherwise, I think it would be fine to take off that rewrite tag. The only issues I see are minor ones. {{User:Baby Luigi/sig}} 20:23, 1 March 2017 (EST) | ||