Talk:Koopeleon: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "==Relation to Troopas== {{talk}} Currently, these are treated as their own subset of Koopas, while their appearance and Japanese name would suggest that they are actually deri...") |
m (→Relation to Troopas: No reason to keep this anymore) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Relation to Troopas== | ==Relation to Troopas== | ||
Currently, these are treated as their own subset of Koopas, while their appearance and Japanese name would suggest that they are actually derived from Koopa Troopas. Any thoughts on this? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:13, 19 October 2017 (EDT) | Currently, these are treated as their own subset of Koopas, while their appearance and Japanese name would suggest that they are actually derived from Koopa Troopas. Any thoughts on this? [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:13, 19 October 2017 (EDT) | ||
:I'd say they're both, though I think we should hear a third opinion on this. {{User:Toadette the Achiever/sig}} 23:42, 19 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
::I'd say they're Koopa Troopas, seeing as how "Koopeleon" doesn't really say much either way. [[User:Niiue|Niiue]] ([[User talk:Niiue|talk]]) 23:54, 19 October 2017 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:14, January 31, 2018
Relation to Troopas[edit]
Currently, these are treated as their own subset of Koopas, while their appearance and Japanese name would suggest that they are actually derived from Koopa Troopas. Any thoughts on this? Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:13, 19 October 2017 (EDT)
