Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done.
- Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so, not, e.g., "I like this idea!"
- "Vote" periods last for one week.
- Any past proposals are archived.
|
A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~).
How To
- Actions that sysops or users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument.
- Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at:
- Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm)
- Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm)
- Sunday: 15:00 (3pm)
- At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has strong reasons supporting it. Every vote should have a reason accompanying it.
- "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line.
- At the deadline, the validity of each vote and the discussion is reviewed by the community.
- A sysop or user calls the result of the proposal and takes action(s) as decided if necessary, and archives the proposal.
The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights).
So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours.
CURRENTLY: 14:41, 11 May 2024 (EDT)
New Features
This is a proposal to impliment a new writing policy that would give order to writing about Mario's fictional universe. MarioWiki: Chronology provides a framework for writing about Mario's "history", as well as settle disputes about where to place items in a chronology.
Proposer: Son of Suns
Deadline: 20:00, 31 August
Add
- Max2 (talk) Mr. SoS has a point.
Don't Add
Removals
The Terrible Big Fandom
Ok people, I'm just sick and tired of even seeing the words "Big Eight". The article is totally nothing but fanon cruft. I think we should just get rid of the article and any mentioning of it within other articles. When you look at it this way all the article is saying is "Uh ok these eight characters appeared playable in early spin-offs before other people and a lot of them are used a lot in their own games or a mainstream game so they are the most important eight characters and since a lot of people think so it is a fact.". Maybe I'm exaggerating, but I don't think so. Oh and, no adding or removing of any characters could fix this thing. WE MUST DESTROY IT WITH FIRE (no not literally)
Proposer: Fixitup
Deadline: 17:00, 24 August
Kill It
- I never thought much about it before, but now that you mention it, it sounds like a waste.-1337Yoshi
- Cobold (talk · contribs) - The Big Eight (and the Marioverse) have already been made writer guidelines. As such, the Big Eight references in articles should indeed be removed, and Marioverse should be replaces with Mario series.
- YELLOWYOSHI398 – Per Cobold.
- Phoenix Rider – Definitely. I was thinking the same thing, but Cobold worded it better.
RAP... – Whoa, that much dirt on one part. And the references that contain "Big Eight", *makes a thumbs-down* DE-LATED!!!!!!!!- Stumpers!I say we kick its big, eight butts out of the Wiki! Go, Fixitup! (but you gotta admit, I helped weaken it earlier... :D)
Nah Leave The Fanon
While some characters are obliviousy important than other, deciding who is a Big Eight and who is not is more of an opinion than anything. Per example, do Toad really qualify? Sure, he have his own game... but all he do nodaway is appearing in some spinoff. I don't see the point in it, anyway.
Gofer
- We would have to edit the writer guidelines as well, to say these are general terms used by fans, but are not actual canon and should not be mentioned in articles. Wa
TC@Y 12:41, 17 August 2007 (EDT)
- I agree, some people are obliviously more important than others, but yeah I couldn't agree more. I'm not sure how the writer guidelines work, but the point of this is to simply rid of any existence of the article.Fixitup
Trouble Center
Face it, folks. The Trouble Center has been rarely used in 2007 after an initial burst, I don't think at all this summer. It's meant for newbies or the experienced to get article help where they cannot, such as knowledge of classic or obscure games. But, both of these kinds of members have fallen through: very few newbs become full members here and usually ask a veteran instead or don't have any questions for article content; veterans work at what they are strongest OR are more involved in sub-communities such as Fantendo or Userpedia instead.
Our community is just not big enough to sustain the ideal function that was set last year. Oh well, but we would survive.
Proposer: Wa TC@Y
Deadline: 17:00, 23 August
Drop It
- Wa TC@Y – community size too small to reach ideal goal, thus it has fallen through like a dead weight.
- Stumpers! It was a good idea, but right now I think it's function would be better served through main page postings, rather than a complex array of pages that only will confuse newbies. Oh, that brings up another question: what's going on with the featured articles? Could the new system just be too complex or am I just confused?
- Phoenix Rider The multiple sub-pages of the Trouble Center would confuse many newbies, especially considering 99% of them have trouble with the simplest syntax. They can always just ask more experienced members.
Plumber
Per Stumpers and Phoenix
Aipom 
I've had calls up since April or March and they haven't been taken. I just don't think it's serving it's main function.
Try a Comeback
XzelionETC - it has potential to become very useful again, maybe just a team needs to fire it up again. All it needs is maybe sometime on the sitenotice...- Mr.Vruet info|talk|chat- It will always be used people will always need help not everyone is good at this and not everyone can get certain pictures for arcticles.
- YELLOWYOSHI398 – It seems like a useful feature, even if it is used sparingly. We could try to revive it, and it would be worthwhile if these efforts were successful.
- Bastila Shan As far as i know, this gives the newer users a chance to help out vets which can really boost the moral and make them long-term editors, it seems cool In my opinion.
- Master Crash its practically a help desk, it helps people with there problems.
um... veterans leavig is true. and that the Trouble Center is like never used... and the fact that some of our users spend way more time at other wikis... but we're sure as heck not low on community! Max2 (talk)
Changes
None currently
Splits
One of the most common proposals, related to splitting one article into multiple ones.
Merges
None currently
Miscellaneous
None currently
