MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Remove Featured Article Status

1. Time Turner (talk) Let me start off with the most evident thing: there is a rewrite template for the Subspace Emissary section. According to rule 5, this already means that it doesn't deserve to keep its FA status. To elaborate, the section describing the plot is absolutely filled with grammatical errors ("which they proceed to carrier off"), speculative text ("whose intent is to kill Lucas"), and especially fanciful writing ("Lucas soon gets his foot snagged on an unearthed root"). None of these are acceptable in a wiki article. Besides that, though, another aspect that I'm not particularly fond of is the article's abuse of subsections. For example, the Rules section, which carries fourteen subsections. Most of them are relatively basic in the first place, with some only having a single sentence. That section can certainly be organized in a better fashion (do we even need that much info on rules?). Small subsections crop up around the entire article, though, and I really think that it would benefit from a clean scrubbing of sections. Also, this article does not describe at all what the gameplay is like. The Gameplay section covers what's new about this game in regards to its predecessors, but it does not state at all how the game actually plays, which I think is just a silly thing to gloss over. The descriptions for the stages are also not very descriptive. Some of them say things like "it is filled with many gimmicks that can either assist or hinder the player", "this stage encorporates elements of various Fire Emblem games" (oh hey, a typo), and "Very similar to Corneria and Venom", which tells me nothing. I know that we have the actual articles of those stages to fully describe them, but if the description leaves me with more questions than answers, it's not a good description. There may be other things that I haven't mentioned, but what I have here is a laundry list of problems with this article.
2. Pinkie Pie (talk) Per Dr. Whooves, as the rewrite template kills me. And the gameplay isn't strong enough.

Keep Featured Article Status

1. Demonic KB (talk) I tried the last 30 minutes to rewrite it, but my stupid computer logged me out, making no change whatsoever, so if someone could help me rewrite this page, I'd greatly appreciate it

Comments

OK, so here what's wrong with it:

• There is a rewrite template for the Subspace Emissary section.
• The Rules section, has fourteen subsections.
• The Gameplay section is too short.
• The descriptions for the stages are not very descriptive.

So for users who oppose against this, you still lose the match, just like you lose a proposal. Pinkie Pie (talk) 22:25, 17 February 2014 (EST)

Why are you repeating what I just said? Time Turner (talk)

Still KB, we need this to be unfeatured. Pinkie Pie (talk) 07:07, 18 February 2014 (EST)

You can't have a negative attitude, I'll do whatever it takes to save this article. Demonic KB (talk)