Talk:Bowser/Special Move Set: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:This is a test for now. We had to move this out of the [[Bowser]] article to make it less cluttered so it could be an FA. This matches the spirit of the proposal, as all the special moves are merged into one article, instead of having many. There is simply not room in many articles for all this content, which necessitated the article creation. But it could be moved back if needed. -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | :This is a test for now. We had to move this out of the [[Bowser]] article to make it less cluttered so it could be an FA. This matches the spirit of the proposal, as all the special moves are merged into one article, instead of having many. There is simply not room in many articles for all this content, which necessitated the article creation. But it could be moved back if needed. -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | ||
::Personally, I think they should have individual articles like before, but if they are merged into the character article they should be organized in a table. {{User:Daniel Webster/Miniature}} 23:45, 23 December 2008 (EST) | ::Personally, I think they should have individual articles like before, but if they are merged into the character article they should be organized in a table. {{User:Daniel Webster/Miniature}} 23:45, 23 December 2008 (EST) | ||
:::Again, tables limit the content, which was prohibited by the proposal. No content can be lost. So we either need individual articles, an article like this, or a section like this in the bigger article. -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | |||
Revision as of 00:47, December 24, 2008
Did I miss a proposal or something to make articles like this? The last I remember, SSB movesets were to be merged with their respective articles. — Stooben Rooben 23:39, 23 December 2008 (EST)
- This is a test for now. We had to move this out of the Bowser article to make it less cluttered so it could be an FA. This matches the spirit of the proposal, as all the special moves are merged into one article, instead of having many. There is simply not room in many articles for all this content, which necessitated the article creation. But it could be moved back if needed. -- Son of Suns (talk)
- Again, tables limit the content, which was prohibited by the proposal. No content can be lost. So we either need individual articles, an article like this, or a section like this in the bigger article. -- Son of Suns (talk)
