Template talk:Stub: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Hey...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
::I don't think we should be deleting any stub articles, isn't SOME info better then NONE? {{USer:Uniju :D/sig}} | ::I don't think we should be deleting any stub articles, isn't SOME info better then NONE? {{USer:Uniju :D/sig}} | ||
:::Well most articles only state obvious and can hurt the wikis image, I'd rather have no info then one line stubs. {{User:Xzelion/Signature}} | :::Well most articles only state obvious and can hurt the wikis image, I'd rather have no info then one line stubs. {{User:Xzelion/Signature}} | ||
::::Well, there's a difference between "Pirate Goomba is a Pirate goomba." style article and other that state some info, but could be expanded greatly. | |||
[[User:Gofer|Gofer]] | |||
Revision as of 20:53, August 26, 2007
A nice gray border might be good. 
Para Yoshi Wahoo! 19:32, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
Nooooo... Not really. 3dejong
- I don't think it looks very nice. It kind of separates the template from the article. Monty Mole (Talk·Contribs) 19:43, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
I made it look a little better. Yep, still don't think it's needed. --Steve (talk) 19:46, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
Hey...
Since any article that is a stub is deleted, why do we still HAVE this template? TheGreatBlockyBoo 19:02, 25 August 2007 (EDT)
- There are still a ton of stub articles on the wiki that were previously created. -- Son of Suns
- About stubs.... What if there is little info and no way to get more? TheGreatBlockyBoo 20:29, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
- There should always be a way to get more info. Be creative! -- Son of Suns
So... Once the stubs are gone, the template goes too? Max2 (talk)
- Well, we don't need to delete it, just in case stubs become okay again (which won't happen until we expand our current stubs). -- Son of Suns
- <.> Why is it that we hate stubs? TheGreatBlockyBoo 20:43, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
