User talk:Bloc Partier
From the Super Mario Wiki
I was known as InfectedShroom, once upon a time.
| InfectedShroom's Archive.
|
|---|
I felt like archiving. Get over it.
Contents |
[edit] POST BELOW.
I forgot. Paperphailurethemariomonster99
[edit] Shroom
So if you havent started writing your shroom, wanna do a paper mario parter review? If you have started, what one are you doing. Oh, and it seems that the last archive didnt work???? Luigfreak
Mai talk
Well, then we can do like a wario issue, I do wario world, you do one of your games? we would just do our regular issues, but with a theme (wario, paper mario, ect.) Luigfreak
Mai talk
[edit] The great..... SHROOMWARNING!!!!!!!!!
Please PM me (Tucayo) your 'Shroom section on the forums (our forums, which one did you think?) by no later than November 10thth. (Please remember to PM a copy to both Stooben Rooben and Saria (Tucayo)). If you can't tell me and I'll be sure to punish you cruelly work something out.
PS: If you happened to recieve a question for the Contact Us thingy, please also PM it with your answer
'Shroomingly yours,
[edit] Mr. Shroomington
HI Bloc Partier!!!
You didnt send your section in time for this 'Shroom's issue, so I wanted to know why, and if you are still going to write for the 'Shroom. If your reason isnt good enough, I'm sorry, but you'll be fired
[edit] beta enemies
did u make the page if so where
Caution! Your Buddy Bill was
yeah...
ok, the words confused me.
Caution! Your Buddy Bill was
ok
[edit] Size Chart
Where was the size chart image retrieved from? FD09
[edit] Patroller
On behalf of the MarioWiki administration, I apologize for the lack of notification in regards to your demotion. If you plan on being more active, I would be happy to reinstate your patroller status. --KPH2293 20:25, 3 June 2009 (EDT)
- No problem. :) Your frustration is understandable, and I once again apologize for the lack of notification. If you ever do return to full activity, feel free to ask for your powers back. --KPH2293 20:39, 3 June 2009 (EDT)
Omigosh SMB:TLL is and evil yet addicting game!
Toadette 4evur !!!
[edit] :/
Hey Bloc Partier, could you help us with the Yoshi article, it really needs help if its gonna stay a featured article and weve still got a lot to do.General bob-omb
12:13, 24 July 2009 (EDT)
[edit] Hi Bloc Partier...
How are you? You never knew me (I think), but it's interesting to see you online (I heard you left the wiki for a bit for school or something). SMB (T · C · E · U1 · U2)
22:57, 16 August 2009 (EDT)
[edit] Images
Why are you removing those images? If they get deleted, they clog up this page and that is a bad thing to have clogged up. If you don't want them in articles, could you at least mark them for deletion? Marioguy1 (Talk)
[edit] Hello
Hi there. I was wondering what you don't like about the proposed way you voted on oppose for? FD09
Hm, that might have made sense for my first proposal but not this one. There is no suggestion that one media is more important than the other here, just that they are not all the same, which goes with there not being a canon. The argument that it currently gives no merit to one over the other isn't important because with either argument a user might assume one way or the other, there's no stopping that and neither is the lesser of two issues. The point of making it more organized is not to give one more importance over the other, it's to make it more organized. The idea you think it is organized now doesn't make sense because everything is just one to the next. There's no order.
So by that logic you would find it more orderly to put every type of library book in abc order rather than have it broken down into sections like horror, romance, fiction, while still keeping an abc order. You seem to be preferring a more cramped harder to sort through pattern. FD09
[edit] Image
[1] This is what it would basically look like. Of course it would say latest portrayal rather than portrayed by. Also, it would have had hair and eyes but at this point in time the voters seemed to not like that idea. FD09

