User talk:YoshiFlutterJump: Difference between revisions

User talk:YoshiFlutterJump (edit)

Revision as of 15:58, October 9, 2019

1,206 bytes added , 4 years ago

no edit summary

Doomhiker

Patrollers, 'Shroom writers

5,231

edits

@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 I haven't voted on it because I don't feel strongly about it any particular way. I was going to wait and see what further arguments were made, but frankly I feel the arguments on both sides have been pretty weak so far and haven't swayed me one way or the other. --{{User:Waluigi Time/sig}} 18:44, July 27, 2019 (EDT)
+==AlphaDream citation==
+Basically, Jack of all Controllers have proven themselves to be unreliable. Firstly, they only appeared all over social randomly with their news article, so unlike a big news site like Nintendo Life or IGN, they need to actually give proof, or at least say, that they have insider information to be believable. The tweet that they cite for Alpha being bankrupt links back to their own Twitter (or at least, should, but while [https://twitter.com/JackControllers/status/1179453947700011008 the link] is dead it is clear where it is meant to go). Finally, look at [https://twitter.com/AlphaFoxWarfare/status/1181246902458814464 this tweet and Glowsquid's comments]. It's not for  the exact thing you're referencing, but still something similar, and it shows how the news site fails to provide sources and gives wrong comparisons. Plus, according to Glowsquid, the editor in chief blocked him, something rather immature of a major part of a news site to do over someone rightfully protesting their tweet. You can ask for proof if you want to. Basically, I don't think that Jack of all Controllers is the best site to trust or cite. {{User:Doomhiker/sig}} 15:57, October 9, 2019 (EDT)