11,517
edits
User talk:RAP/Archive 14: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Hello) |
No edit summary |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Hey I was just wondering why are character info boxes against the rules to have on your user page? | Hey I was just wondering why are character info boxes against the rules to have on your user page? | ||
{{User:Dry dry bones/sig}} | {{User:Dry dry bones/sig}} | ||
==Image discussion== | ==Image discussion== | ||
| Line 46: | Line 44: | ||
===Personal images=== | ===Personal images=== | ||
Thanks for deleting | Thanks for deleting File:Girl time.jpg. Out of interest, if an image is worked into an article, does it count as a personal image? If so, can I upload a fourth image?--[[User:Launchballer|Launchballer]] 15:17, 18 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
===Replacing Images=== | ===Replacing Images=== | ||
| Line 115: | Line 113: | ||
*I didn't mean to make you upset there. Heck, I didn't even know that other users asked that similar question too. Either way, at least compressing images will make it easier for some people to fully access them. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 21:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | *I didn't mean to make you upset there. Heck, I didn't even know that other users asked that similar question too. Either way, at least compressing images will make it easier for some people to fully access them. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 21:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
*I got your last message and tested out that PNG Monster program on a PNG image that I recently uploaded, namely the Bullet Bill sprite from SMW 2; <nowiki>File:BulletBill-SMW2.png</nowiki>. Interesting how one program can compress PNG images even further than what The GIMP is capable of. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 11:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC) | *I got your last message and tested out that PNG Monster program on a PNG image that I recently uploaded, namely the Bullet Bill sprite from SMW 2; <nowiki>File:BulletBill-SMW2.png</nowiki>. Interesting how one program can compress PNG images even further than what The GIMP is capable of. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 11:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
*Well, another PNG image editing tip is that when dealing with video game sprites, most usually use less than 256 colors, so indexing them will help reduce their memory usage, while maintaining their color quality as well. Of course, this does apply to before the PNG Monster program is used. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 23:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
*To index images with The GIMP, go to '''Image > Mode > Indexed...'''. Choose the maximum number of colors that the image will have (up to a maximum of 256 colors), and then select '''Convert'''. The image will become indexed as a result. On a side note, semi-transparency is removed when indexing images, but there will be at least '''1''' transparent color if the image has an '''Alpha Layer'''. {{User:M&SG/sig}} 23:21, 8 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
===Hello=== | ===Hello=== | ||
| Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
===Juuuuump Mode=== | ===Juuuuump Mode=== | ||
Hi, should this article be deleted: | Hi, should this article be deleted: Juuuuump Mode I mean, its information can easily be covered in the [[Cholesteroad]] article. Its very short and can't be expanded. Also the Juuuuuump Mode is hard to get right creating alot of red links if someone tried. So how do I nominate it for deletion? Thanks! | ||
{{User:Booderdash/sig|.}} | {{User:Booderdash/sig|.}} | ||
| Line 154: | Line 154: | ||
Hey RAP! Could I (or you) remove the failed featured articles from the bottom of the FA page that failed over two months ago? I don't think they serve any purpose there after two months other than a waste of space. Thanks! {{User|Marioguy1}} | Hey RAP! Could I (or you) remove the failed featured articles from the bottom of the FA page that failed over two months ago? I don't think they serve any purpose there after two months other than a waste of space. Thanks! {{User|Marioguy1}} | ||
:Um...I mean [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles#Failed Nominations|this section]] - if that's what you meant, can someone remove the out-of-date ones please? {{User|Marioguy1}} | :Um...I mean [[MarioWiki:Featured Articles#Failed Nominations|this section]] - if that's what you meant, can someone remove the out-of-date ones please? {{User|Marioguy1}} | ||
::OK, on that last topic, | ::OK, on that last topic, MarioWiki:Featured Articles/Unfeature/N1/Princess Daisy is still out there. {{User|Marioguy1}} | ||
Hey RAP, weren't those you deleted archives? Or if they weren't, were they archived? --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 15:19, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | Hey RAP, weren't those you deleted archives? Or if they weren't, were they archived? --{{User:Tucayo/sig}} 15:19, 8 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 267: | Line 267: | ||
===Re: Forums=== | ===Re: Forums=== | ||
My username is "apostlebird" {{User:Coincollector/sig}} You can see also an animation of Daisy with it. that's me. | My username is "apostlebird" {{User:Coincollector/sig}} You can see also an animation of Daisy with it. that's me. | ||
===Hello Again!=== | |||
Mr. RAP, I've recently been dabbling around in Image Licencing and stuff under Maintenance! I've found that it IS rather addicting, but I can't tell why! Anyway, would it be alright if I occasionally worked on some of the Enemy articles listed for improving? {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 13:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
:OK! Um, I had a look and saw that some (Mecha-Bowser, SMG2 Enemies) are listed there but have no improvement templates such as stub, construction, etc. Shouldn't those articles be removed from the list then? Also, what is "Derivative work"?{{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 11:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
Can you sort it out if you're online now? {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} 21:40 15/08/10 GMT | |||
:Okay. {{User:Frostyfireyoshi/sig}} | |||
===archive=== | |||
I think you need to archive this talk page it's very messy. [[User:Breawycker|Breawycker]] 15:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC) | |||
===Wiki day=== | |||
[[Image:Chocolate Cake SPM.png|50px]] Well, happy Wiki birthday! Have a piece of cake, its on the house. {{User|Emperor Yoshi}} | |||