User talk:Porplemontage: Difference between revisions

==Confused about [[Special:Diff/4036148|this change]]==

I guess this probably came about from ''Super Mario Bros. Wonder'', but...I disagree with it being done this way. I know there's been public discussions on what to do with game filenames, and of [[MarioWiki talk:Naming#Decide how to handle internal naming|the]] [[MarioWiki talk:Naming#Decide how to handle internal filenames: take 2|two]] proposals that got canceled, the latter was leaning in the direction of doing something about internal data with the development tier in the comments. Reclassifying game ("internal") data from development names to website ("external") filenames conflicts with at least two proposals: the [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/60#Partially unban citing the English version of the Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia as official names for subjects|encyclopedia one]] specifically outlines that ''Super Mario Bros. Encyclopedia'' remains a lower priority than internal names, citing the Lumacomète example as a reason, and in the [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/63#Reconsider Nintendo's website filenames being used as a source|website proposal]], no one was conflating game filenames with website filenames, and rather, there seemed to be general agreement of keeping them both distinguishable. Plus, [[Kracka|there]] [[Brickman|are]] [https://triforcewiki.com/wiki/User:LTL/The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Link%27s_Awakening_(2019)_enemy_glossary cases] where the unused data/string is not necessarily a ''file''name or even "[[Talk:Togemasuku|internal]]" per se. It's a weird technicality.<br>As unrelated as possible: if there is a question we want to ask more privately, would the best way to do it be via forum DM? [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 13:41, November 4, 2023 (EDT)